• 2025-04-24

    Sean Duffy letter to AIP applicants on DOT compliance requirements

    In an April 2025 letter, the U.S. Secretary of Transportation reminded all DOT funding recipients — including state and local governments — that they must comply with federal anti-discrimination laws, including prohibitions on race- and sex-based preferences, and must cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. The letter warns that programs or policies tied to 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' goals may violate federal law, and that issuing driver's licenses to undocumented individuals or otherwise impeding ICE could constitute noncompliance. Recipients who fail to meet these obligations risk losing federal transportation funding, facing audits, or having grant agreements terminated.
  • 2025-04-24

    Letter to all recipients of U.S. Department of Transportation funding

    In an April 2025 letter, the U.S. Secretary of Transportation reminded all DOT funding recipients — including state and local governments — that they must comply with federal anti-discrimination laws, including prohibitions on race- and sex-based preferences, and must cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. The letter warns that programs or policies tied to 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' goals may violate federal law, and that issuing driver's licenses to undocumented individuals or otherwise impeding ICE could constitute noncompliance. Recipients who fail to meet these obligations risk losing federal transportation funding, facing audits, or having grant agreements terminated.
  • 2025-01-03

    Letter to State legislators re. 2025 legislation reforming RCW 53

    From: Sea-Tac Noise.Info To: The Honorable Tina Orwall, Senator 33rd Legislative District of Washington State January 3, 2025 Senator Orwall, We’ve noted recent statements from the City of SeaTac (and other local electeds) regarding the ‘unique’ nature of their 2018 ILA with the Port of Seattle. By that, we assume they mean ‘unrepeatable’. STNI is
  • 2024-12-13

    The STNI SAMP Draft EA Public Comment (final)

    The deadline for sending in comments on the SAMP Draft EA is Friday December 13, 2024. Here is the final version of our comment which we’ve sent to the Port of Seattle and FAA. We know that many of you are looking for pre-made comments. Please use any portion of this letter to help you.
  • 2024-12-12

    Four-City Joint Comment Letter on Seattle-Tacoma International Airport SAMP Draft Environmental Assessment

    Four cities near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport — Burien, Normandy Park, SeaTac, and Des Moines — submitted formal comments in December 2024 objecting to the airport's Sustainable Airport Master Plan Environmental Assessment. The cities warn that planned growth will increase annual flight operations by nearly 20% by 2032, expanding the noise impact zone and exposing an estimated 22,000 residents to significant aircraft noise, up from about 14,000 in 2022. They call on the Port of Seattle to extend public review periods, improve its sound insulation program, and take proactive steps to protect the low-income and minority communities most burdened by airport noise.
  • 2024-12-12

    City of Des Moines Comment Letter on Seattle-Tacoma SAMP Draft Environmental Assessment

    The City of Des Moines submitted formal comments to the Port of Seattle in December 2024, expressing serious concerns about the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's Sustainable Airport Master Plan and its projected growth in flight operations. The letter warns that by 2032, a nearly 20% increase in annual flights will significantly expand noise exposure for Des Moines residents, with the population affected by harmful noise levels rising by roughly 37% even without the proposed expansion. The city calls on the Port and FAA to extend public review periods, develop meaningful noise mitigation measures such as sound insulation programs, and collaborate more genuinely with neighboring communities rather than treating public input as a regulatory checkbox.
  • StART Letterhead

    Official header graphic for the StART (SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table), a noise-policy advisory body associated with Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA). The banner displays the StART acronym with an airplane icon and the full name 'SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table' on a dark green background.
  • 2024-06-22

    Fifteen Percent?

    Below is the 1full text of a letter we received from Ryan McMullan, the Senior Manager for Noise Programs in response to our concerns about the 2024-04 Sound Insulation Repair and Replacement Pilot Program. If you’ve been following along, in May, the Port began an ‘assessment’ phase to last until December 31. This is supposedly
  • 2024-05-06

    WAC 173-60-050 appendix C — Exemptions

    This document covers Washington State noise regulation exemptions under WAC 173-60-050, listing activities exempt from standard noise limits—such as construction, aircraft flight operations, emergency equipment, hunting, and railroad traffic—along with time-based conditions (e.g., 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.) that apply to some exemptions. It also includes a Growth Management Act county map showing which Washington counties are mandated to plan, opting to plan, or planning only for critical areas and resource lands. Together, these materials provide regulatory context for noise policy and land-use planning relevant to airport-adjacent communities like those near Sea-Tac.
  • 2024-05-06

    Answer on ‘LIMITED Update’ from FAA

    This document presents a point-by-point rebuttal to an FAA 'Limited Update' regarding a new flight departure procedure at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, arguing that the FAA has failed to conduct required safety risk analyses, properly assess cumulative noise and air quality impacts on environmental justice communities, and comply with court-ordered environmental review under NEPA. The authors contend that the FAA is understating the scope and timeline of the Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan (SAMP) expansion while dismissing significant health, noise, and emissions impacts on nearby residents. The critique calls out procedural shortcuts, incomplete public comment responses, and what it characterizes as predetermined conclusions designed to avoid full environmental scrutiny.