Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagCitizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion(47)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2023-08-27

    CASE officers and contacts list

    This document appears to be an organizational roster for CASE (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion), listing officer positions and contact information including a Chair (acting), Vice Chair, Treasurer, Secretary, and members of Technical and Research Committees focused on noise and environmental health concerns. The document references a goal of addressing airport expansion alternatives and includes phone numbers for key members such as Loretta Bower (Treasurer) and Joan Bell (Secretary). It likely dates from the early period of community organizing around Sea-Tac Airport expansion opposition.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAirport Expansion, CASE, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Handwritten Notes, RCAA, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2022-09-12

    Opening brief of petitioner Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion

    This legal brief was filed by Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion before the Washington Supreme Court, challenging a decision by the Pollution Control Hearings Board regarding the expansion of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The group argues that state regulators improperly allowed the Port of Seattle to rely on future, unwritten stormwater permits as proof that airport runoff would meet water quality standards, and that regulators wrongly pre-authorized pollution mixing zones in nearby waterways without sufficient oversight. The case centers on whether proper environmental protections were in place before approving the airport expansion project.
    TagsCitizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, RCAA, Stormwater
  • 2019-05-01

    Advocacy credentials email from Debi Wagner to Sharyn Parker

    In a May 2019 email to Sharyn Parker, Debi Wagner outlines her extensive advocacy history related to Sea-Tac Airport and aviation environmental issues, including serving on the Burien Airport Advisory Committee, co-founding US Citizens Aviation Watch in 1998, and co-authoring Burien Resolution 375 in 2015. Her experience spans noise, air quality, and climate change concerns, with roles on the Port of Seattle Energy and Sustainability Committee and the UW Ultrafine Advisory Panel. Handwritten notes on the document also reference Resolution #408 for the Burien Airport Committee in 2019 and membership in the Clean Air Network, a regional group of air quality experts and educators.
    TagsActivism, Burien Airport Committee, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Debi Wagner, Quiet Skies Coalition
  • 2004-04-08

    Declaration of Gillis E. Reavis in opposition to Airport Communities Coalition’s motion for injunctive relief

    This document is a Declaration by attorney Gillis E. Reavis filed in the Supreme Court of Washington in a case where the Port of Seattle challenged the Pollution Control Hearings Board, Airport Communities Coalition, and Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion. The declaration opposes a motion for injunctive relief and attaches excerpts from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Record of Decision for a Port of Seattle Section 404 wetlands permit (1996-4-02325), which covers environmental reviews under the Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, and other federal statutes related to airport expansion. The underlying dispute centers on regulatory approvals for Sea-Tac Airport development and its environmental impacts on surrounding communities.
    TagsAirport Communities Coalition, Army Corp of Engineers, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, RCAA
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR016649: Prefiled Testimony of John J. Strunk — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB 01-160

    Prefiled testimony of John J. Strunk submitted in Pollution Control Hearings Board case No. PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Testimony covers analysis of potential migration of STIA contamination, including perched groundwater contamination, Qva aquifer conditions, subsurface utility pathways, and construction
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-10-21

    PCHB 01-160: Prefiled Direct Testimony of Dr. Charles S. Wisdom

    Prefiled direct testimony of Dr. Charles S. Wisdom (Senior Project Manager, Parametrix, Inc.) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), case No. PCHB 01-160, filed on behalf of respondents Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle against appellants Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE). Wisdom holds a Ph.D. in Chemical Ecology
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR016294: Prefiled Testimony of Charles Ellingson — Embankment Infiltration Modeling, Walker Creek and Miller Creek Fills, PCHB No. 01-160

    Prefiled testimony of Charles Ellingson submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Testimony covers embankment modeling methodology using an integrated model approach combining Hydrus models
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR015899: Prefiled Testimony of Jan L. Cassin, Ph.D. — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Prefiled direct testimony of Jan L. Cassin, Ph.D., submitted in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Testimony addresses wetlands identification on the Vacca Farm site, mitigation plan adequacy, restoration and enhancement credit ratios, Miller Creek
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-09-19

    EXH AR000336: Port Of Seattle Notice of Appearance — ACC and CASE v. Pollution Control Hearings Board, Case No. 02-2-01549-0

    Port Of Seattle Notice of Appearance filed September 19, 2002 in Thurston County Superior Court, Case No. 02-2-01549-0, entering appearance through General Counsel Linda J. Strout (WSBA #9422) and Senior Port Counsel Traci M. Goodwin (WSBA #14974). Petitioners are Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE); respondents include the Pollution Control Hearings
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-09-01

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Granting Certificate of Appealability — ACC & CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order Granting Certificate of Appealability in PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Board members Kaleen Cottingham, Robert V. Jensen, and William H. Lynch granted direct appellate review requests filed by both ACC/CASE (Thurston
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 … Page 5
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Samp NTP Final NEPA EA FAA Record of Decision and SEPA Next Steps 10 22 25 Page 15" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V