Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagStephen Hockaday(5)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2022-09-12

    Declaration of Dr. Stephen L. M. Hockaday in support of respondent/cross-petitioner Airport Communities Coalition’s reply in support of its emergency motion for injunctive relief pursuant to RAP 8.3

    Dr. Stephen L. M. Hockaday, a Professor Emeritus of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo with over 25 years of airport and airspace planning experience, submitted this declaration in support of the Airport Communities Coalition's emergency motion for injunctive relief before the Washington Supreme Court. The case involves the Port of Seattle, the Pollution Control Hearings Board, and the Washington Department of Ecology in a dispute related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. Dr. Hockaday's credentials include serving as Head of Eurocontrol's airspace and airport modelling service and managing major FAA programs at the nation's ten busiest airports.
    TagsAirport Communities Coalition, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, RCAA, Stephen Hockaday, Supreme Court Of Washington
  • 2002-10-04

    PCHB Doc 13: Declaration of Kevin L. Stock in Response to Port Of Seattle’s Application for Direct Review

    Declaration of Kevin L. Stock, attorney for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), filed October 4, 2002, in King County Superior Court case No. 02-2-25658-9 SEA, Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), ACC, and Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion (CASE). Lists Exhibits A–L attached to the declaration, including seven letters from Dr. Stephen Hockaday to
    TagsACC, CASE, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stephen Hockaday
  • 2002-07-18

    Regional airports continue to play a vital role in meeting aviation and development needs

    A 2002 presentation to the Washington State Senate Transportation Committee argues that regional airports play a vital role in relieving pressure on major hubs like Sea-Tac by distributing aviation demand across multiple facilities. The presentation highlights that many large metro areas already operate successful multi-airport systems—such as the New York and Los Angeles regions—and that low-cost carriers actively seek out regional airports for their cost and service advantages. It also notes that a post-9/11 drop in air travel demand created an opportunity to study and plan for expanded regional airport capacity in Washington State.
    CategoriesMeetings TagsRCAA, Stephen Hockaday
  • 2001-10-08

    PCHB Doc 6948: Declaration of Stephen L. M. Hockaday in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay

    Declaration by Stephen L. M. Hockaday, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo and expert in airport/airspace planning, filed in support of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Stay in PCHB Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160. Opposes Port Of Seattle construction of Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport pending resolution of
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stephen Hockaday, Third Runway
  • 1996-03-18

    Testimony of Dr. Stephen Hockaday before the Subcommittee on Aviation of the House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

    In 1996 congressional testimony, Dr. Stephen Hockaday argued against building a costly third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, contending that the Port of Seattle greatly overstated the frequency of poor weather conditions that would require it. He presented evidence that true instrument flight conditions occur less than 8% of the year—not the 44% the Port claimed—and that existing navigation technologies like Localizer Directional Aid approaches could address capacity needs at far lower cost. Hockaday warned that spending half a billion dollars on a runway used only 15% of the time would divert resources from better long-term regional aviation solutions.
    TagsFAA, Port Of Seattle, RCAA, Sea-Tac Airport, Stephen Hockaday, Third Runway
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "1997 Port pact replaced" — , 2005

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V