TagChevron Deference(3)

Advanced Search Options

  • 2024-06-28

    Supreme Court weakens federal regulators, overturning decades-old Chevron decision

    BY  MARK SHERMAN WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Friday upended a 40-year-old decision that made it easier for the federal government to regulate the environment, public health, workplace safety and consumer protections, delivering a far-reaching and potentially lucrative victory to business interests. The court’s six conservative justices overturned the 1984 decision colloquially known as Chevron, long a
  • 2022-06-30

    West Virginia et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency et al.

    In West Virginia v. EPA (2022), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on whether the Environmental Protection Agency had the legal authority to use the Clean Air Act's Section 111(d) to require power plants to shift electricity generation away from coal toward cleaner energy sources. The Court examined EPA's 2015 Clean Power Plan, which set carbon dioxide emissions limits so strict that coal plants could only comply by reducing their own production or investing in natural gas and renewable energy. The case ultimately turned on whether Congress had clearly granted EPA such broad authority to reshape the national energy mix, a question analyzed under the 'major questions doctrine.'
  • 1984-06-25

    Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

    Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that set forth the legal test for when U.S. federal courts must defer to a government agency’s interpretation of a law or statute.[1] The decision articulated a doctrine known as “Chevron deference“.[2] Chevron deference consisted of a two-part test that was