Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagLobbyists(5)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2020-03-23

    Assumption of Risk and Agreement to Hold Harmless and Indemnify (Individual) — Megan G Knight / ABCx2 LLC / Arlington County

    This document is a signed Hold Harmless and Indemnification Agreement between Megan G. Knight, a lobbyist, and ABCx2 LLC, related to contract 20-042-RFP with Arlington County, Virginia. In it, Knight agrees to assume all inherent risks associated with performing contract work and releases Arlington County from any liability for claims, damages, injuries, or costs arising from that work. The agreement was electronically signed on March 23, 2020, via Adobe Sign.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsLegal, LobbyistsFolderVianair
  • Elevate Government Affairs

    Federal lobbyists for the Port Of Seattle. As of 2020 their chief lobbyist is Jeff Markey Jeff Markey is a 29-year veteran of Washington, DC and has spent more than a quarter century working to drive outcomes at the federal level. He has worked across issues in his roles as both senior staff to Members
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsJeff Markey, Lobbyists
  • 2019-06-01

    Lockridge Grindal Nauen Invoice for May Hours, 2019 — City of Burien

    This document contains a May 2019 legal invoice from Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P. to the City of Burien for $2,750, covering 13.5 hours of attorney work related to environmental assessment modeling and preparation for client meetings on federal and stakeholder engagement strategies. The accompanying email chain shows City of SeaTac Community & Economic Development Director Steve Pilcher approving payment of the revised invoice after an error in the original billing was corrected by attorney Emily Tranter. The work appears connected to airport noise and environmental policy efforts involving both the City of Burien and the City of SeaTac.
    TagsCity of Burien, Environmental Impact Statement, Lobbyists, Lockridge Grindal NauenFolderPDR26-042 Burien
  • Scannedimage.tif pdf
    2019-06-01

    Lockridge Grindal Nauen Invoice for May Hours, 2019 — City of Burien

    This document contains a May 2019 legal invoice from Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P. to the City of Burien for $2,750, covering 13.5 hours of attorney work related to environmental assessment modeling and preparation for client meetings on federal and stakeholder engagement strategies. The accompanying email chain shows City of SeaTac Community & Economic Development Director Steve Pilcher approving payment of the revised invoice after an error in the original billing was corrected by attorney Emily Tranter. The work appears connected to airport noise and environmental policy efforts involving both the City of Burien and the City of SeaTac.
    TagsCity of Burien, Environmental Impact Statement, Lobbyists, Lockridge Grindal NauenFolderPDR26-042 Burien
  • 1999-02-16

    1999 Legislative Services Contract: ACC and Smith Alling Lane

    Cover letter dated February 16, 1999 from Robert E. Mack of Smith Alling Lane P.S. (Tacoma, WA) to Lisa Logie, Executive Director of the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), transmitting a revised 1999 Legislative Services Contract for signature by Robert Sheckler, Chair of the ACC Executive Committee, along with an L1 Lobbyist Registration form. The contract,
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Lobbyists, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderACC
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V