Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagHOK(13)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1997-02-01

    Sea-Tac International Airport impact mitigation study: Initial assessment and recommendations

    ★ 32
    The HOK Study. 1997 initial assessment and recommendations report for the Sea-Tac International Airport Impact Mitigation Study, prepared by Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum and Raytheon Infrastructure Services. The study was funded by a State of Washington grant on behalf of the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, and Tukwila, as well as
    CategoriesKey Documents TagsEIS, Environmental Impact Statement, HOK, Noise, pollution, Third Runway
  • 1995-06-16

    ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1410 – Operating Budget, 1995-1997

    ★
    This is Washington State's 1995-1997 Operating Budget (Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1410), passed by the state legislature on May 24, 1995, and signed by Governor Mike Lowry on June 16, 1995, with partial vetoes. The bill appropriates funding for state agency operations during the fiscal biennium from July 1, 1995, through June 30, 1997. Note: This document does not appear to contain content directly related to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    CategoriesKey Documents, Legislation TagsCity of Burien, HOK, Mike Heavey, Washington State Legislature
  • 2025-09-07

    HOK: Des Moines Socio-Economic Impacts: $6.4 Million breakdown

    Comparison of one section of the 1997 HOK TL;DR The 1997 Impacts Study covers a great deal of material. The Executive Summary makes many claims.  We agree with its conclusions in the broad strokes. We created these breakdowns of specific cities, with an emphasis on how they align with the official NEPA/SEPA Sea-Tac Airport 1996
    TagsHOK
  • 1997-04-25

    HOK Weekly Project Progress Report: Sea-Tac Impact Mitigation Study (April 25, 1997)

    Weekly Project Progress Report dated 25 April 1997 for the Sea-Tac Impact Mitigation Study (HOK Project #96-0154-802), submitted by Joseph A. Pobiner, AICP, of Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, Inc. (HOK), Dallas. Covers period 21-25 April 1997. Distributed to Fred Stouder (City of Burien), Donal Simpson (HOK/Dallas), Dennis Cope (HOK/Seattle), Gerry Tunnell (Raytheon), Steve Dennis (Raytheon),
    TagsCity of Burien, HOK, Raytheon, Sea-Tac Airport, Thomas/Lane
  • 1997-04-25

    HOK Weekly Project Progress Report: Sea-Tac Impact Mitigation Study (April 25, 1997)

    A April 1997 memo and progress report from Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, Inc. (HOK) summarizes the near-complete Sea-Tac Area Mitigation Study, which assessed environmental, traffic, and socio-economic impacts related to Sea-Tac Airport. The memo outlines scheduling recommendations for a series of public and stakeholder meetings planned for May 1997 in Burien, Washington, including suggestions to consolidate citizen meetings and limit City Council sessions. As of the report date, all major project tasks were at 100% completion except the Mitigation Plan, which stood at 99%, with the consultant team preparing to present final findings to the community.
    TagsCity of Burien, HOK, Raytheon, Sea-Tac Airport, Thomas/Lane
  • 1997-02-01

    Sea-Tac International Airport Impact Mitigation Study: Initial Assessment and Recommendations — Section 9, Potential Socio-Economic Impacts and Mitigation

    A 1997 study commissioned by cities and institutions near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport found that airport operations depress nearby property values compared to similar homes elsewhere in King County, and that properties directly under flight paths suffer additional losses from noise, visual pollution, and reduced quality of life. Researchers compared single-family homes around Sea-Tac with comparable homes in Northwest King County (Shoreline area), using strict criteria to ensure fair comparisons. The study notes that while overall regional growth means nearby home values may still rise over time, they appreciate more slowly than they would without the airport's presence.
    TagsEIS, Environmental Impact Statement, HOK, King County, Property Values, RCAA, Regional Commission On Airport Affairs, Socioeconomic Impacts, Third Runway
  • 1997-02-01

    Sea-Tac International Airport impact mitigation study: Initial assessment and recommendations – Appendix A: Equity issues and socio-economic impacts

    A 1997 study examined the unequal distribution of costs and benefits generated by Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, finding that while the airport's economic benefits (jobs, income, and travel services) spread across the broader Puget Sound region, its harms—including noise, traffic, and reduced property values—fell disproportionately on a small number of nearby cities: Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, and Tukwila. Data from a 1991 passenger survey showed that these five heavily impacted communities accounted for only 5.9% of home-originating enplanements, while King County as a whole contributed 57.2%. The study concluded that mitigation measures were needed to redirect some of the airport's regional benefits back to the communities bearing the greatest burden of its operations.
    TagsHOK, RCAA, Third Runway
  • 1997-02-01

    Sea-Tac International Airport impact mitigation study: Initial assessment and recommendations

    A 1997 impact mitigation study found that the expansion of Sea-Tac International Airport, including a proposed Third Runway, would impose significant costs on surrounding communities — with Burien and Des Moines alone accounting for nearly 80% of an estimated $2.95 billion in mitigation needs. The study examined 26 specific environmental impacts across areas such as noise, air quality, and water quality, and recommended establishing a permanent noise monitoring program to ensure projected noise contours are not exceeded. It also called for a comprehensive South King County planning effort to balance the needs of communities, schools, hospitals, and the airport.
    TagsHOK, RCAA, Regional Commission On Airport Affairs, Socioeconomic Impacts, Studies
  • Seatac impact mitigation study 1997 01 section 1 introduction project scope pdf
    1997-01-01

    Sea-Tac Impact Mitigation Study: Section 1 Introduction and Section 1.02 Project Scope

    Draft introduction and project scope section of the SeaTac Impact Mitigation Study, January 1997, funded by a State of Washington grant administered through the Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development (CTED) and managed by the City of Burien. Assesses impacts of the proposed Seattle-Tacoma International Airport third runway (8,500 feet) on five communities —
    TagsCity of Burien, Environmental Impact Statement, HOK, Third Runway, Thomas/Lane
  • 1997-01-01

    Sea-Tac Impact Mitigation Study: Section 1 Introduction and Section 1.02 Project Scope

    This 1997 draft study assessed the potential environmental, transportation, and socioeconomic impacts of a proposed third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on five neighboring communities—Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, and Tukwila—as well as the Highline School District and Highline Community Hospital District. Funded by a Washington State grant administered through the City of Burien, the study was conducted by a team of consultants and aimed to develop mitigation strategies and funding mechanisms to address impacts on affected jurisdictions. The report reviewed the Port of Seattle's Environmental Impact Statement and proposed independent mitigation measures, while expressly prohibited from being used to oppose the runway's construction.
    TagsCity of Burien, Environmental Impact Statement, HOK, Third Runway, Thomas/Lane

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "2026 05 26 rm 11b presentation SAMP ntp draft SEPA EIS page 05" — , 2026

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V