Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

Tagcandidates(9)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2025-11-01

    November 2025 Election: South King County Candidate Responses on Environmental Issues

    Ahead of the November 2025 election, candidates for the Port of Seattle Commission and the 33rd District House of Representatives responded to questions from Defenders of Highline Forest about environmental and health impacts on communities living near SeaTac Airport. Port Commission candidates Ryan Calkins and Toshio Hasegawa outlined plans to accelerate noise insulation programs, pursue sustainable aviation fuel goals, and work toward permanently preserving North SeaTac Park as community greenspace. State House candidate Edwin Obras proposed comprehensive legislation called the Airport-Adjacent Community Health & Mitigation Act, which would mandate noise and air quality fixes, establish emissions deadlines for ground operations, and create independent oversight to protect airport-adjacent residents.
    Tagscandidates, Defenders Of Highline Forest, North Sea-Tac Park, Port Of Seattle Commission, Ryan CalkinsFolderDefenders of Highline Forest
  • 2025-11-01

    November 2025 Election: South King County Candidate Responses on Environmental Issues

    Candidate responses to environmental questionnaire from Defenders of Highline Forest for the November 2025 election in South King County. Port of Seattle Commission Position 1 candidate Ryan Calkins and Position 4 candidate Toshio Hasegawa address health and environmental impacts of Sea-Tac Airport growth on BIPOC, immigrant, elder, and low-income near-airport residents; North SeaTac Park (NSTP)
    Tagscandidates, Defenders Of Highline Forest, North Sea-Tac Park, Port Of Seattle Commission, Ryan CalkinsFolderDefenders of Highline Forest
  • 2025-10-22

    Port Of Seattle & 33rd Legislative District Candidate Forum

    The SeaTac Airport Community Coalition for Justice is hosting a candidate forum on Wednesday, October 22, 2025, from 5:30–8 PM in Downtown Burien, bringing together Port of Seattle Commissioner and 33rd Legislative District candidates to discuss airport noise, air pollution, and community impacts. The event covers themes including environmental and health justice, workforce access, and policy coordination, with attendance available in person or via Zoom (registration required). The forum aims to hold local elected officials accountable for decisions affecting residents who live near Sea-Tac Airport.
    Tags350 Seattle, candidates, community engagement, KCIACC, Port Of Seattle CommissionFolderGroups
  • 2025-10-22

    Port Of Seattle & 33rd Legislative District Candidate Forum

    Event flyer and informational handout for a candidate forum hosted by the SeaTac Airport Community Coalition for Justice (No Added Harm / fixtheharm.org) on Wednesday, October 22, 2025, 5:30–8PM in Downtown Burien. Features Port of Seattle Commissioner candidates and 33rd Legislative District candidates on the same stage discussing Sea-Tac Airport impacts including noise, air pollution,
    Tags350 Seattle, candidates, community engagement, KCIACC, Port Of Seattle CommissionFolderGroups
  • 2023-07-29

    King Lysen for King County Council Position 7 campaign flyer

    This is a campaign mailer for King Lysen, a Democratic candidate for King County Council Position 7, running on a platform of government accountability and citizen advocacy. Lysen was notably active in fighting Sea-Tac Airport noise pollution, leading anti-noise efforts and sponsoring a state bill to expand the Port Commission from five to nine members. Endorsed as a 'rising star' by the Argus newspaper and rated 'good' by the Municipal League, Lysen campaigned on vigorously questioning government spending and operations in King County.
    TagsBurien, candidates, election endorsements, King County Council, King LysenFolderPolitics
  • King lysen king county council 7 campaign flyer pdf
    2023-07-29

    King Lysen for King County Council Position 7 campaign flyer

    Campaign flyer for King Lysen, Democratic candidate for King County Council Position 7, based in Burien, Washington (P.O. Box 66173, Burien, WA 98166). Slogan: ‘a good reason to vote.’ Features endorsement quotes from the Argus Northwest Weekly Independent Newspaper (‘rising star’), Seattle PI (Lysen promises to keep government on its toes through constant questioning), Federal
    TagsBurien, candidates, election endorsements, King County Council, King LysenFolderPolitics
  • 2023-06-14

    Candidates briefing

    This June 2023 candidates briefing from Port of Seattle Executive Director Steve Metruck outlines how the Port manages its operations across four business lines — Aviation, Maritime, Economic Development, and Corporate — guided by interwoven priorities including equity, sustainability, safety, fiscal responsibility, and cybersecurity. It also breaks down the Port's $2.0 billion in funding sources, showing that operating revenues (45.2%) and bond proceeds (35.0%) make up the bulk of funds, while the property tax levy accounts for just 4.1%. The document does not directly address Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    Tagscandidates, Port Of Seattle, Presentation, Stephen Metruck, Tax LevyFolderCommission
  • 2019-07-04

    LOQSV 2019 Candidate Questionnaire Cover Letter

    The League of Quiet Skies Voters (LOQSV), a Seahurst, WA-based organization focused on aviation noise and its impacts on health and the environment near Sea-Tac Airport, sent a candidate questionnaire to 2019 election candidates on July 4, 2019. The letter invited candidates to share their positions on aviation expansion, human health, and environmental concerns, with responses to be published before the primary election if submitted by July 19, 2019. LOQSV described itself as an advocate for communities neighboring the 8th busiest airport in the United States.
    TagsAirport Expansion, candidates, League Of Quiet Skies Voters, Politics, Sea-Tac Airport, Steve EdmistonFolderQuiet Skies Puget Sound
  • The Race For State Representative 34th District

    If you live in the 34th District, I urge you to contact both Joe Nguyen and Shannon Braddock and share your knowledge and your concerns about the airport. It is a sad fact that most of our state politicians know very little about the problems that beset residents of our region and could care even
    CategoriesNews Stories Tagscandidates
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Port of Seattle Regular Commission Meeting
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Sep 9: 10:30am
    2711 Alaskan Way, Seattle, WA 98121
    2026 09 09 rm packet pdf 3

    Order of Business 10:30 a.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Executive Session – if necessary, pursuant to RCW 42.30.110 (executive sessions are not open to the public) 12:00 p.m. – Public Session Reconvene or Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of the Agenda 4. Special Orders of the Day 5. Executive Director’s

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Port of Seattle Commissioner with clout cash also attracts controversy" — , 2017

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V