TagPaul Barden(13)
-
1981-05-13
King County Council Notice: Proposed Motion 81-322 Rescinding Motion 4668, Building and Land Development File 224-78-R (Port Of Seattle Reclassification)
★Memo dated May 13, 1981 from Laura Pharr, King County Council Staff, to Parties of Record for Building and Land Development File 224-78-R, notifying them that Proposed Motion 81-322 will be considered by the King County Council on May 26, 1981 at 9:30 a.m. The motion rescinds Motion 4668, which concurred with the Zoning and -
1981-05-13
King County Council Notice: Proposed Motion 81-322 Rescinding Motion 4668, Building and Land Development File 224-78-R (Port Of Seattle Reclassification)
★ 32In December 1979, the King County Council passed Motion 4668 approving a rezone request by the Port of Seattle (Building and Land Development File No. 224-78-R), subject to conditions including the Port providing 5 acres for a neighborhood park and agreeing not to develop a 55-acre Westside Greenbelt buffer area for ten years. In May 1981, the Council proposed Motion 81-322 to rescind and replace Motion 4668, with key differences in the conditions outlined on page 2 of each motion. The matter, which had been appealed by both the applicant and neighboring property owners, required a separate public hearing in affected communities as part of the site plan approval process. -
1989-04-03
Ordinance No. 8996: An ordinance relating to comprehensive planning; adopting the Sea-Tac Area Update and Area Zoning
King County Ordinance No. 8996, adopted April 3, 1989, updates comprehensive land use planning and zoning for the Sea-Tac Airport area, incorporating community input and environmental review to guide orderly development near the airport. The ordinance formally adopts the Sea-Tac Area Update and Area Zoning as official county policy, amending several prior ordinances related to the Highline Communities Plan. It also establishes policies for the development of North Sea-Tac Park, with safety designated as the foremost planning consideration. -
1980-08-01
King County Ordinance 80-828: Amending the Highline Communities Plan to Accommodate Senior Housing
King County Council ordinance proposed by Paul Barden (Proposed No. 80-828), dated August 1, 1980, amending the Highline Communities Plan as adopted by Ordinance 3530 (1977) to accommodate senior housing. Amends Policy H-10 (page 28) to distinguish elderly multifamily housing from general multifamily housing under RCW 36.69, recognizing reduced neighborhood impacts and site-specific evaluation. Amends -
1980-08-01
King County Ordinance 80-828: Amending the Highline Communities Plan to Accommodate Senior Housing
A 1980 King County ordinance amending the Highline Communities Plan to better accommodate senior housing, recognizing that elderly-focused multifamily housing generates less neighborhood impact than traditional multifamily development and should be evaluated on its own site-specific merits. The ordinance also updates cultural facilities policy to encourage public-private cooperation in developing a performing arts theatre in the Highline Community, including through the possible formation of a Park and Recreation District. -
1975-05-20
Sea-Tac/Communities Plan briefing invitation and summary of key recommendations
A 1975 letter from the Port of Seattle invites King County Council member Paul Barden to a briefing on the Sea-Tac/Communities Plan, a two-year, $640,000 study examining the relationship between Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and surrounding communities. The accompanying summary outlines key recommendations, including that the Port of Seattle assume primary responsibility for a comprehensive noise remedy program involving property acquisition, noise insulation, and avigation easements, while King County take the lead on land use changes and infrastructure improvements in affected areas. The plan also calls for both agencies to seek changes in federal and state legislation to expand funding and expand the scope of noise abatement programs. -
1973-10-22
Left vs. Right in County Council race
A 1973 Seattle Times article covers a King County Council race between Democratic incumbent King Lysen and Republican challenger Paul Barden, with both candidates divided on county issues including noise concerns near Seattle-Tacoma Airport. Lysen, representing County Council District 7, expressed concern about residents near the airport and the impact of county policies on property values and noise levels in the Puget Sound region. The race was expected to be closely contested, with the outcome likely to influence county policy on development and noise management near Sea-Tac. -
1973-04-15
Proposed Evergreen County 1973-04-15
A black-and-white map depicting the 'Proposed Evergreen County,' a suggested new county to be carved from the southern portion of King County, Washington. The map shows boundaries relative to Seattle, Renton, Kent, Auburn, Tacoma, Pierce County, Puget Sound, the Green River, and references the Highline School District boundary and Federal Way School District boundary. -
1973-04-15
‘Small-loans’ bill approved despite labor opposition
A April 15, 1973 edition of The Seattle Times covers several local and state stories, including the passage of a controversial 'small-loans' bill in the Washington State Legislature despite strong opposition from organized labor, and a proposed move to create a new Evergreen County by separating suburban areas of King County from Seattle's urban core. The paper also includes local news on topics ranging from a cow-chip throwing contest to an auto club tree-planting initiative, along with retail advertisements typical of the era. -
1973-03-27
The Seattle Times, Tuesday, March 27, 1973
A 1973 Seattle Times editorial argues that King County voters were right to reject a proposed change to the Seattle Port Commission's structure, warning that the port's noise-abatement and management record near Sea-Tac Airport would not improve under the new arrangement. The piece contends that the commission, as currently constituted, is more responsive to constituents and that the proposed restructuring would not adequately address jet-aircraft noise complaints from surrounding communities. Voters are urged to maintain the existing commission structure rather than gamble on an unproven alternative.