Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPaul Barden(11)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1981-05-13

    King County Council Notice: Proposed Motion 81-322 Rescinding Motion 4668, Building and Land Development File 224-78-R (Port Of Seattle Reclassification)

    ★ 32
    In December 1979, the King County Council passed Motion 4668 approving a rezone request by the Port of Seattle (Building and Land Development File No. 224-78-R), subject to conditions including the Port providing 5 acres for a neighborhood park and agreeing not to develop a 55-acre Westside Greenbelt buffer area for ten years. In May 1981, the Council proposed Motion 81-322 to rescind and replace Motion 4668, with key differences in the conditions outlined on page 2 of each motion. The matter, which had been appealed by both the applicant and neighboring property owners, required a separate public hearing in affected communities as part of the site plan approval process.
    CategoriesHistory, Key Documents Tags224-78-R, Boeing, King County, King County Council, Land Use, Paul Barden, Port Of SeattleFolderProposed Boeing HQ 1978
  • 1989-04-03

    Ordinance No. 8996: An ordinance relating to comprehensive planning; adopting the Sea-Tac Area Update and Area Zoning

    King County Ordinance No. 8996, adopted April 3, 1989, updates comprehensive land use planning and zoning for the Sea-Tac Airport area, incorporating community input and environmental review to guide orderly development near the airport. The ordinance formally adopts the Sea-Tac Area Update and Area Zoning as official county policy, amending several prior ordinances related to the Highline Communities Plan. It also establishes policies for the development of North Sea-Tac Park, with safety designated as the foremost planning consideration.
    CategoriesLegislation TagsGreg Nickels, Highline Communities Plan, North Sea-Tac Park, NSTP, Paul Barden, Sea-Tac Area Update, Sea-Tac Communities PlanFolderNSTP
  • 1980-08-01

    King County Ordinance 80-828: Amending the Highline Communities Plan to Accommodate Senior Housing

    A 1980 King County ordinance amending the Highline Communities Plan to better accommodate senior housing, recognizing that elderly-focused multifamily housing generates less neighborhood impact than traditional multifamily development and should be evaluated on its own site-specific merits. The ordinance also updates cultural facilities policy to encourage public-private cooperation in developing a performing arts theatre in the Highline Community, including through the possible formation of a Park and Recreation District.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsBurien, Highline Communities Plan, Highline Community Plan, Housing, King County Council, Land Use, Paul BardenFolderHighline Community Plan
  • 1975-05-20

    Sea-Tac/Communities Plan briefing invitation and summary of key recommendations

    A 1975 letter from the Port of Seattle invites King County Council member Paul Barden to a briefing on the Sea-Tac/Communities Plan, a two-year, $640,000 study examining the relationship between Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and surrounding communities. The accompanying summary outlines key recommendations, including that the Port of Seattle assume primary responsibility for a comprehensive noise remedy program involving property acquisition, noise insulation, and avigation easements, while King County take the lead on land use changes and infrastructure improvements in affected areas. The plan also calls for both agencies to seek changes in federal and state legislation to expand funding and expand the scope of noise abatement programs.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsADAP, King County Council, Paul Barden, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Communities PlanFoldermisc
  • 1973-10-22

    Left vs. Right in County Council race

    A 1973 Seattle Times article covers a King County Council race between Democratic incumbent King Lysen and Republican challenger Paul Barden, with both candidates divided on county issues including noise concerns near Seattle-Tacoma Airport. Lysen, representing County Council District 7, expressed concern about residents near the airport and the impact of county policies on property values and noise levels in the Puget Sound region. The race was expected to be closely contested, with the outcome likely to influence county policy on development and noise management near Sea-Tac.
    CategoriesHistory TagsEvergreen County, King County Council, King Lysen, Paul Barden, PoliticsFolderSeattle Times
  • 1973-04-15

    Proposed Evergreen County 1973-04-15

    A black-and-white map depicting the 'Proposed Evergreen County,' a suggested new county to be carved from the southern portion of King County, Washington. The map shows boundaries relative to Seattle, Renton, Kent, Auburn, Tacoma, Pierce County, Puget Sound, the Green River, and references the Highline School District boundary and Federal Way School District boundary.
    TagsEvergreen County, History, King County, Map, Paul Barden, Seattle TimesFolderHistory
  • 1973-04-15

    ‘Small-loans’ bill approved despite labor opposition

    A April 15, 1973 edition of The Seattle Times covers several local and state stories, including the passage of a controversial 'small-loans' bill in the Washington State Legislature despite strong opposition from organized labor, and a proposed move to create a new Evergreen County by separating suburban areas of King County from Seattle's urban core. The paper also includes local news on topics ranging from a cow-chip throwing contest to an auto club tree-planting initiative, along with retail advertisements typical of the era.
    CategoriesHistory TagsEvergreen County, Paul BardenFolderSeattle Times
  • 1973-03-27

    The Seattle Times, Tuesday, March 27, 1973

    A 1973 Seattle Times editorial argues that King County voters were right to reject a proposed change to the Seattle Port Commission's structure, warning that the port's noise-abatement and management record near Sea-Tac Airport would not improve under the new arrangement. The piece contends that the commission, as currently constituted, is more responsive to constituents and that the proposed restructuring would not adequately address jet-aircraft noise complaints from surrounding communities. Voters are urged to maintain the existing commission structure rather than gamble on an unproven alternative.
    CategoriesHistory TagsEvergreen County, Paul Barden, Seattle TimesFolderSeattle Times
  • 1973-03-14

    30% more Saran Wrap for the same old price

    Neighbors of Seattle-Tacoma Airport expressed support for a proposed port setup, with a spokeswoman stating her backing for the Seattle Commission's position opposing House Bill 319, which would have changed how airport-area County Council districts were elected. The Port Commission and King County Council had consulted with the Federal Aviation Administration regarding a $100,000 study to determine how to address airport noise and pollution affecting nearby residents. A Zone Three Committee was formed to represent airport-area residents and push for more responsive local governance on noise-related issues.
    CategoriesHistory TagsEvergreen County, Paul BardenFolderSeattle Times
  • 1973-03-01

    Cashmere Valley Record, March 1, 1973 — legislators report on Evergreen County bill, state lottery, Alpine Lakes, Red Cross

    This March 1, 1973 edition of the Cashmere Valley Record covers Washington State legislative activity, including Senate passage of an annual sessions bill, a state lottery measure, and a supplemental budget. Local topics include the Alpine Lakes Land Use Alternatives debate and its potential economic impact on Chelan County's timber and tax base. The paper also features commentary on social security increases, gun control legislation, and a Red Cross fundraising appeal for Chelan County communities.
    CategoriesHistory TagsEvergreen County, King County, King Lysen, Newspaper Article, Paul Barden, Port Of Seattle Commission, state legislature, Washington State LegislatureFolderKing County

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "A letter to Tina Orwall re. Port Package problems" — , 2019

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V