TagFONSI(6)
-
2025-09-01
Finding of No Significant Impact/Record of Decision for the Sustainable Airport Master Plan Near-Term Projects at the seattle-tacoma international airport
★ 32FAA’s Finding of No Significant Impact and Record of Decision for the Sustainable Airport Master Plan Near-Term Projects at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The document provides final agency determinations and approvals for federal actions necessary to implement 31 near-term improvement projects addressing efficiency, safety, and passenger processing needs at SEA. -
2025-11-24
25-7439 Petition for Review of Agency Order – City of Burien, City of Des Moines, and City of SeaTac v. FAA
A petition filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit challenging the FAA’s Finding of Significant Impact/Record of Decision for the Sustainable Airport Master Plan Near-Term Projects at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The petition was filed by three Washington cities seeking review of the September 24, 2025 FAA decision. -
2025-11-24
Petition for Review of Agency Order – City of Burien, City of Des Moines, and City of SeaTac v. Federal Aviation Administration
A petition filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit challenging the FAA’s Finding of Significant Impact/Record of Decision for the Sustainable Airport Master Plan Near-Term Projects at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The petition was filed by three Washington cities seeking review of the September 24, 2025 FAA decision. -
NEPA Forty Most Asked Questions
1. Range of Alternatives. 2. Alternatives Outside the Capability of Applicant or Jurisdiction of Agency. 3. No-Action Alternative. 4. Agency’s Preferred Alternative. 5. Proposed Action v. Preferred Alternative. 6. Environmentally Preferable Alternative. 7. Difference Between Sections of EIS on Alternatives and Environmental Consequences. 8. Early Application of NEPA. 9. Applicant Who Needs Other Permits. 10. -
2017-08-03
Barnes v. Federal Aviation Administration – Ninth Circuit Court Opinion
U.S. Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit opinion denying petition for review of FAA decision finding no significant environmental impact for new runway project at Hillsboro Airport near Portland, Oregon. The court held that the FAA’s supplemental environmental assessment and FONSI determination were not arbitrary or capricious. -
2017-08-03
Barnes v. Federal Aviation Administration – Ninth Circuit Court Opinion
U.S. Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit opinion denying petition for review of FAA decision finding no significant environmental impact for new runway project at Hillsboro Airport near Portland, Oregon. The court held that the FAA’s supplemental environmental assessment and FONSI determination were not arbitrary or capricious.