Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagNoise Control Act of 1972(13)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2026-07-21

    Quiet Communities, Inc. et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al., Case No. 23-cv-1649 (JMC) — Memorandum opinion and order

    A federal court ruled in 2023 that the EPA had unreasonably delayed for over 40 years in carrying out its legal duties under the Noise Control Act of 1972, which requires the agency to regulate environmental noise, publish noise-related reports, and help state and local governments develop noise control programs. Although President Reagan defunded the EPA's noise office in 1982, Congress never actually repealed the Noise Control Act, meaning the EPA's obligations under the law remained in force. The court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, finding the EPA's inaction on four key counts unlawful.
    TagsEnvironmental Protection Agency, EPA, FAA, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet Communities
  • 23 16 1649 quiet communities v EPA pdf
    2026-07-21

    Quiet Communities, Inc. et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al., Case No. 23-cv-1649 (JMC) — Memorandum opinion and order

    A federal court ruled in 2023 that the EPA had unreasonably delayed for over 40 years in carrying out its legal duties under the Noise Control Act of 1972, which requires the agency to regulate environmental noise, publish noise-related reports, and help state and local governments develop noise control programs. Although President Reagan defunded the EPA's noise office in 1982, Congress never actually repealed the Noise Control Act, meaning the EPA's obligations under the law remained in force. The court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, finding the EPA's inaction on four key counts unlawful.
    TagsEnvironmental Protection Agency, EPA, FAA, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet Communities
  • 23 16 1649 quiet communities v EPA memo and opinion pdf
    2026-07-16

    Quiet Communities, Inc. v. EPA: Memorandum Opinion and Order (Case No. 23-cv-1649)

    U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia memorandum opinion and order in Quiet Communities, Inc. et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al., Case No. 23-cv-1649 (JMC), filed July 16, 2026. Judge grants in part and denies in part cross-motions for summary judgment. Court finds EPA unreasonably delayed implementing the Noise Control
    TagsEnvironmental Protection Agency, EPA, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet Communities
  • 2026-07-16

    Quiet Communities, Inc. v. EPA: Memorandum Opinion and Order (Case No. 23-cv-1649)

    A federal court ruled in July 2026 that the EPA has unlawfully delayed carrying out its duties under the Noise Control Act of 1972, a law that has remained on the books even though the agency effectively shut down its noise control program in 1982 after Congress approved President Reagan's budget cuts. The lawsuit, brought by Quiet Communities, Inc. and Jeanne Kempthorne, argued that over forty years of EPA inaction on noise regulation violated the agency's legal obligations. The court granted partial summary judgment for the plaintiffs on four counts, finding the decades-long delay unreasonable, while dismissing other claims for lack of jurisdiction or failure on the merits.
    TagsEnvironmental Protection Agency, EPA, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet Communities
  • 2023-09-07

    Answer to Complaint: Quiet Communities, Inc. et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al.

    This is a legal answer filed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in federal court responding to a lawsuit brought by Quiet Communities, Inc. over noise control enforcement. The EPA admits that its Office of Noise Abatement and Control was shut down in 1982, but largely denies or declines to respond to the plaintiffs' other factual and legal claims. The case centers on whether the EPA has failed to fulfill its duties under the Noise Control Act, which is relevant to ongoing debates about airport and environmental noise policy.
    TagsEPA, Litigation, Noise Control Act of 1972, Quiet Communities
  • 23 16 1649 quiet communities v EPA answer to complaint pdf
    2023-09-07

    Answer to Complaint: Quiet Communities, Inc. et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al.

    EPA’s Answer filed September 7, 2023 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Case No. 1:23-cv-01649-JMC. Defendants United States Environmental Protection Agency and Administrator Michael S. Regan respond to Quiet Communities, Inc.’s complaint alleging EPA has failed to fulfill duties under the Noise Control Act of 1972. EPA admits closure of the Office
    TagsEPA, Litigation, Noise Control Act of 1972, Quiet Communities
  • 2023-06-15

    Quiet Communities Act of 2023 (H.R. 4178)

    H.R. 4178, the Quiet Communities Act of 2023, is a bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on June 15, 2023, that seeks to reestablish the EPA's Office of Noise Abatement and Control, which has received no funding since 1982. The bill highlights the serious health impacts of noise pollution — including hearing loss, cardiovascular disorders, sleep deprivation, and learning deficits in children — affecting millions of Americans exposed to noise from aircraft, vehicular traffic, and other sources. Because the EPA remains legally responsible for enforcing noise regulations while lacking an active office to do so, and because federal law limits state and local governments from regulating many noise sources, the bill argues that noise abatement programs across the country have effectively lain dormant.
    TagsEnvironmental Protection Agency, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet Communities
  • 2023-06-15

    Quiet Communities Act of 2023 (H.R. 4178)

    H.R. 4178, the Quiet Communities Act of 2023, is a bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on June 15, 2023, that seeks to reestablish the EPA's Office of Noise Abatement and Control, which has received no funding since 1982. The bill highlights the serious health impacts of noise pollution — including hearing loss, cardiovascular disorders, sleep deprivation, and learning deficits in children — affecting millions of Americans exposed to noise from aircraft, vehicular traffic, and other sources. Because the EPA remains legally responsible for enforcing noise regulations while lacking an active office to do so, and because federal law limits state and local governments from regulating many noise sources, the bill argues that noise abatement programs across the country have effectively lain dormant.
    TagsEnvironmental Protection Agency, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet Communities
  • 2023-06-07

    Quiet Communities, Inc. v. EPA: Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

    A 2023 federal lawsuit filed against the EPA argues that the agency has ignored its legal duties under the Noise Control Act for over 40 years, ever since it shut down its noise regulation offices in 1982. The plaintiffs, a nonprofit noise-reduction organization and an affected Massachusetts resident, are asking the court to force the EPA to resume studying and regulating noise pollution as Congress originally required. While not specific to Sea-Tac Airport, the case has broad implications for communities nationwide suffering from unregulated noise pollution, including airport noise.
    TagsEPA, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet Communities
  • 23 16 1649 quiet communities v EPA complaint pdf
    2023-06-07

    Quiet Communities, Inc. v. EPA: Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

    Complaint filed June 7, 2023 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Case No. 1:23-CV-1649) by Quiet Communities, Inc. and Jeanne M. Kempthorne against the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Administrator Michael S. Regan. Plaintiffs seek to compel EPA to perform nondiscretionary statutory duties under the Noise Control Act, 42 U.S.C.
    TagsEPA, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet Communities

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR021830: GeoSyntec Letter — ACC Response to Comments, West MSE Wall Seismic Stability, Third Runway" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V