Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagAirline Deregulation Act(10)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1978-10-24

    Airline Deregulation Act of 1978

    ★ 32
    The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (Public Law 95-504) amended the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 to shift the U.S. air transportation system away from heavy government regulation toward open market competition, allowing competitive forces to determine airline prices, routes, and service quality. The law established key policy priorities including maintaining safety as the highest concern, preventing monopolistic practices, encouraging new carriers to enter the market, and preserving scheduled service to small communities. While focused on economic deregulation rather than noise policy directly, the resulting surge in air traffic growth it enabled has significant implications for airport noise management planning.
    CategoriesKey Documents TagsAirline Deregulation Act
  • 2024-02-16

    Port Of Seattle’s Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint

    The Port of Seattle filed this legal reply brief seeking dismissal of a lawsuit brought by five plaintiffs (Codoni, Geer, Cathcart, France, and Chakos) related to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport operations. The Port argues that the plaintiffs' claims are barred by federal preemption under the Civil Aeronautics Act, the Airline Deregulation Act, and the Federal Aviation Act, which collectively give the federal government exclusive authority over aviation and airport operations. The Port also contends that the plaintiffs lack legal standing to bring inverse condemnation claims under the 'subsequent purchaser rule.'
    CategoriesLitigation TagsAirline Deregulation Act, Clean Air Act, Hagens-Berman, Litigation, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2024-02-16

    Alaska Air Group and Delta Air Lines, Inc.’s Joint Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint

    Alaska Air Group and Delta Air Lines filed a joint reply in federal court seeking dismissal of a class-action lawsuit brought by Seattle-area residents over noise and air quality impacts from flights at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The airlines argue that federal law—including the Airline Deregulation Act and the Clean Air Act—preempts the plaintiffs' state-law claims, leaving no room for local or state courts to regulate airline flight operations. The case, heard in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, centers on whether residents can use state law to challenge airline service to Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsAirline Deregulation Act, Alaska Air, Clean Air Act, Delta, FAA
  • 2022-06-15

    The Rush

    I’ve spoken to several Des Moines residents this week, people who were deeply opposed to the Third Runway, but wish the Port would “get its act together and do something about those long lines at the airport!” Or… they hate the noise, but on the other hand, the $45 flights from Boise are just the
    CategoriesChange The Culture TagsAirline Deregulation Act, CAB, Civil Aeronautics Board
  • 2019-06-01

    ACRP Legal Research Digest 37: Legal Issues Relating to Airports Promoting Competition

    This 2019 legal research digest examines how U.S. airports can legally encourage competition among airlines and fixed-base operators (FBOs) while complying with federal grant requirements. It covers the impact of airline industry consolidation, the rules airports must follow to avoid unfair discrimination or granting exclusive rights, and practical strategies for accommodating carriers with different business models.
    TagsAIP, Airline Deregulation Act, Airport Cooperative Research Program, Airport Law, Passenger Facility Charges
  • Airline Deregulation Act Overview

    Created by FindLaw’s team of legal writers and editors | Last updated June 20, 2016 It’s true. Most of us don’t associate “air travel” with the words “cheap” and “efficient.” Everything from arriving at the airport two hours before takeoff to making our way through security and enduring the flight to our destination can be an ordeal.
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsAirline Deregulation Act, Findlaw
  • What Prompted Airline Deregulation 20 Years Ago? What Were the Objectives of That Deregulation and How Were They Achieved?

    This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers | Last updated January 10, 2018 In 1998 we celebrate 20 years of airline deregulation in the United States. Coincidentally we can also commemorate 60 years of airline regulation and 40 years of airline reregulation. History of the Air Carrier Regulation In 1938, when the Civil Aeronautics
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsAirline Deregulation Act, Findlaw
  • 1982-04-01

    Flyer: How An Airline Sets Up At Sea-Tac

    This April 1982 edition of the Sea-Tac Flyer, the Port of Seattle's employee newsletter, explains how airlines set up operations at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport following federal deregulation in 1978. It details the process new carriers must follow, including obtaining route authorization, negotiating facility leases or sharing arrangements with established airlines, and working with Port departments on construction and agreements. The issue also covers airline announcements, a Black History Month exhibit, and other employee news from the airport.
    TagsAirline Deregulation Act, CAB, Flyer, Newsletter, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 1980-04-21

    FAA Says Orange County, California Noise Policy Discriminates Against New Entrants

    In April 1980, the Federal Aviation Administration ruled that Orange County, California's noise abatement policy at John Wayne Airport was unlawfully discriminatory because it blocked new airlines from entering while protecting existing carriers. The FAA warned the county to accommodate pending entry applications from airlines like Continental and Frontier without further delay, or face legal and financial penalties. While the FAA supported local noise control efforts, it made clear that such policies must treat all qualified air carriers equally and not place undue burdens on interstate commerce.
    TagsAirline Deregulation Act, Airport Noise Law, FAA, John Wayne Airport
  • FAA noise regulation reporter 155 orange county john wayne airport 1980 04 21 pdf
    1980-04-21

    FAA Says Orange County, California Noise Policy Discriminates Against New Entrants

    Noise Regulation Reporter Number 155 (April 21, 1980) reports that FAA Chief Counsel Clark H. Onstad informed the Orange County, California Board of Supervisors that its noise abatement policy at John Wayne Airport is ‘unjustly discriminatory’ against new airline entrants. The FAA found that denying entry to Continental Air Lines, Frontier Airlines, Pacific Southwest Airlines,
    TagsAirline Deregulation Act, Airport Noise Law, FAA, John Wayne Airport
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "PCHB Doc 756: Proposed Order Disposing of Port Of Seattle’s Petition for Reconsideration Regarding Condition 8 of Final Order — PCHB No. 01-160" — , 2002

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V