Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagBoeing HQ(11)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2022-08-28

    Highline Communities Plan: Errata and Adopted HCP Modifications

    This document contains official corrections and modifications to the Highline Communities Plan, a land-use planning document for communities near Sea-Tac Airport in King County, Washington. It addresses errata such as street name corrections, zoning designation changes, and map updates, as well as adopted modifications related to hazard area development, Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), and a notable recognition of Boeing's proposed corporate headquarters on Port of Seattle property west of Sea-Tac Airport. The modifications also acknowledge that an environmental impact statement was being prepared by King County regarding the Boeing proposal, while community input had not yet been formally gathered.
    TagsBoeing HQ, HCP, Highline Communities Plan, King County, Sea-Tac AirportFolderHighline Community Plan
  • 2022-08-27

    Boeing HQ Proposed Site: Project Site Plan and Building Entry Level Plan (Figs. 3–5)

    228-78-R
    Tags224-78-R, Boeing, Boeing HQ, EIS, Environmental Impact Statement, King County, Land Use, MapFolderBoeing
  • 1979-12-21

    Motion No. 4668: King County Council Motion Concurring with Zoning and Subdivision Examiner Recommendation Regarding Reclassification Petitioned by Port Of Seattle, Building and Land Development File No. 224-78-R

    In December 1979, the King County Council passed Motion No. 4668, concurring with the Zoning and Subdivision Examiner's recommendation to approve a land reclassification petitioned by the Port of Seattle (File No. 224-78-R), related to development of a Boeing facility near Sea-Tac Airport. As conditions of approval, the Port of Seattle was required to provide 5 acres for a neighborhood park along 12th Avenue South and to enter into a memorandum of understanding with King County freezing development on a 55-acre Westside Greenbelt buffer zone for ten years. The motion also mandated a separate public hearing in affected communities during the site plan approval process, reflecting efforts to balance airport-related development with residential stability concerns.
    Tags224-78-R, Boeing HQ, King County Council, Land Use, NSTP, Port Of Seattle, Westside Hilltop Survival CommitteeFolderProposed Boeing HQ 1978
  • 1979-02-08

    Environmental Assessment and Addendum: File 224-78-R and 210-79-U — Proposed Boeing Corporate Headquarters Facility, Port Of Seattle, February 8, 1979

    This 1979 environmental assessment from King County's Department of Planning & Community Development evaluates the Port of Seattle's application to rezone approximately five acres near Sea-Tac Airport to allow Boeing to build a corporate headquarters facility, including offices, parking, and a heliport. The proposed Phase I development would include a two-story building with roughly 95,000 square feet of office space and parking for 235 cars, with approximately 200 employees on site. The document also outlines the county's land use history and ordinances governing development on the west side of Sea-Tac Airport, emphasizing protections for adjacent residential neighborhoods.
    Tags224-78-R, Boeing HQ, environmental assessment, King County, Port Of SeattleFolderProposed Boeing HQ 1978
  • 1979-01-22

    Notice of Public Hearing – Port of Seattle Zoning Amendment 224-78-R

    King County notice of public hearing for Port of Seattle’s application to rezone 29.42 acres on 12th Avenue South from RS-7200 to RM-900-P for Boeing Company corporate headquarters. The hearing was scheduled for February 8, 1979.
    Tags224-78-R, Boeing HQFolderProposed Boeing HQ 1978
  • 1979-01-01

    Greater Highline Community Parks Board: North Sea-Tac Park Master Plan Flyer and Booster Club Application

    This brochure from the Greater Highline Community Parks Board outlines the Master Plan for North Sea-Tac Park, a 50-acre recreational area developed in the airport's north clear zone — land set aside due to aircraft noise impacts. Formed after a 1979 jointly funded planning effort by the Port of Seattle and King County, the nonprofit board manages the park and the Sunset Activity Center (a former junior high school), offering facilities for groups such as a BMX club, equestrian association, and Kennedy High School cross-country trails. The document also promotes a Booster Club membership drive to support continued park development and operations.
    CategoriesHistory TagsBoeing HQ, Flyer, GHCPB, Greater Highline Community Parks Board, King County, North Sea-Tac Park, NSTPFolderGHCPB
  • 1978-03-23

    File 224-78-R: Environmental Assessment and Preliminary Report to the Zoning & Subdivision Examiner — Boeing Corporate Headquarters, Sea-Tac Airport West Side

    In 1978, the Port of Seattle applied to rezone a 29-acre parcel on the west side of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport from single-family residential to Manufacturing Park (M-P) to allow Boeing to build its Corporate Headquarters Office Facility. The proposed Phase I development included a two-story, 150,000-square-foot building with underground parking for 235 cars and roughly 200 employees, along with road construction, radar relocation, and site landscaping. The application required an Environmental Impact Statement and raised land-use compatibility questions given that surrounding community plans had designated much of the site as open space or parkland.
    Tags224-78-R, Boeing HQ, Highline Community Plan, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderProposed Boeing HQ 1978
  • 1978-01-01

    Letter from King County Councilman Bob Grieve on Boeing HQ Relocation and Highline Community Plan

    King County Councilman Bob Greive wrote to constituents expressing his opposition to the relocation of Boeing's headquarters into an open space buffer zone near Sea-Tac Airport, an area designated under the 1977 Highline Community Plan to protect nearby residents from airport-related impacts. Despite his protests, the King County Council voted to amend the comprehensive plan and rezone the land from single-family residential to light manufacturing, with only three of nine council members opposing the measure. Greive vowed to continue fighting airport development that threatened surrounding neighborhoods and asked residents for their input on how to hold the Port Commission, federal government, and King County accountable to their promises regarding Sea-Tac.
    CategoriesCorrespondence Tags224-78-R, Bob Grieve, Boeing, Boeing HQ, Highline Community Plan, King County, King County Council, Land Use, Sea-Tac AirportFolderProposed Boeing HQ 1978
  • 1978-01-01

    Letter from King County Councilman Bob Grieve on Boeing HQ Relocation and Sea-Tac Airport Development

    King County Councilman Bob Greive wrote to constituents explaining his opposition to Boeing's headquarters relocation into an area designated as an open space buffer under the 1977 Highline Community Plan, which was meant to protect neighborhoods surrounding Sea-Tac Airport from noise and development impacts. Despite protests from nearby residents and three dissenting council votes, the majority approved an ordinance amending the comprehensive plan to allow rezoning from single-family residential to light manufacturing. Greive solicited public opinion on proposals to hold the Port Commission, federal government, and King County accountable for promises made regarding Sea-Tac's impact on surrounding communities.
    CategoriesCorrespondence, History Tags224-78-R, Bob Grieve, Boeing HQ, Highline Community Plan, King County Council, Sea-Tac AirportFolderProposed Boeing HQ 1978
  • 1978-01-01

    Boeing Headquarters Proposal Map

    A site plan diagram of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, with an arrow and label identifying a specific 'SITE' location in the northern portion of the airport property. The plan shows runway configurations, taxiways, terminal areas, and surrounding land uses.
    TagsBoeing, Boeing HQ, Map, Sea-Tac Airport, TBDFolderProperties

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Pages from des_moines_creek_basin_plan_1997-kcr148-202-existing land use" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V