TagBarbara Hinkle(9)

Report AR042353 prepared by HNTB, Hart Crowser Inc., and Parametrix for Port Of Seattle Aviation Program Management Group, evaluating retaining wall and slope alternatives to reduce impacts to Miller Creek at embankment station 174+00 to 186+00 for the Third Dependent Runway project at Sea-Tac International Airport. Transmitted July 13, 1999 by Barbara Hinkle to Tom

Memorandum dated July 9, 1999 from Reese P. Hastings and Michael J. Bailey, P.E. (Hart Crowser, Inc.) to Barbara Hinkle, Port Of Seattle, regarding Third Runway Project Borrow Areas 1, 3, and 4 and projected impacts to wetlands. Document J-4978-02 quantifies potential wetland resource impacts from excavation of borrow areas providing 7.9 million bank cubic

Hart Crowser memorandum (J-4978-03) dated December 23, 1998, from Michael Bailey P.E. and Michael Kenrick P.E. to Barbara Hinkle, Port Of Seattle, addressing hydrologic impacts of Borrow Areas 1, 3, and 4 for the Third Runway Project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Discusses impacts on baseflow to Des Moines Creek and riparian wetlands, including runoff reduction,

Hart Crowser letter (project J-4978-03) to Barbara Hinkle, Health Safety & Environmental Services, Port Of Seattle, dated December 9, 1998, addressing aquifer compaction beneath the proposed Third Runway embankment at Sea-Tac Airport in response to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers questions on hydrogeologic impacts. Analysis covers the Shallow Aquifer (contributing to Miller Creek base flow),

A March 1998 fax exchange between the Port of Seattle and Herrera Environmental Consultants concerns the scope of work and cost estimates for Third Runway Water Quality Compliance Services. Carlos Herrera of Herrera Environmental sent documents to Port of Seattle contacts Barbara Hinkle and Kym Mattress, arguing that routine project water quality monitoring should be Herrera's responsibility, covering both compliance and BMP performance monitoring. Herrera noted he believed this approach would be most credible to the Washington Department of Ecology and neighboring airport communities, and requested review and discussion of the cost estimates to potentially reduce the budget.

In December 1996, the Port of Seattle submitted a Section 404 permit application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to place fill material in waters of the United States as part of Sea-Tac Airport's Master Plan Update, which included construction of a third parallel runway. The application explains that the new runway, located 2,500 feet west of the existing 16R/34L runway, was needed to reduce severe arrival delays during poor weather conditions, which were costing airlines approximately $42 million annually. The project was the outcome of nearly a decade of regional planning, including the PSRC's Flight Plan Study, which evaluated numerous alternatives before recommending the runway expansion as the best solution for the region's long-term air travel needs.

In December 1996, the Port of Seattle submitted a Section 404 permit application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to place fill material into wetlands at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport as part of its Master Plan Update, which included construction of a third parallel runway. The proposed runway, located 2,500 feet west of the existing runways, was intended to address severe arrival delays during poor weather conditions, which reduced airport capacity from 60 to as few as 24 arrivals per hour roughly 44% of the year. The application was the result of nearly a decade of regional planning, environmental review, and public involvement, including studies confirming that no feasible supplemental airport sites existed in the four-county region.

A 1993 Port of Seattle letter to Des Moines resident Barbara Stuhring explains that airplane deicing at Sea-Tac uses only FAA-approved ethylene or propylene glycol, and that wastewater from deicing drains to the airport's treatment system before being discharged to Puget Sound — not to Miller or Des Moines Creeks. A 1996 Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) later addressed public concerns about deicing fluid effects on local waterways, concluding that glycol quantities in stormwater runoff were too small and too diluted to cause lethal impacts on aquatic life in those creeks. Stuhring subsequently wrote to the Port challenging what she saw as a contradictory response in the Final EIS compared to the original 1993 letter.