Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPM25(10)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2025-09-15

    Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Monitoring Site Tour: Agenda and Overview

    This document presents materials from a Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Monitoring Site Tour held in September 2025, covering the agency's mission to protect air quality across King, Pierce, Snohomish, and Kitsap counties. It outlines key programs including climate action planning, wood stove replacement, and diesel emissions reduction, with a focus on fine particulate matter (PM2.5), which accounts for 90% of cardiac and respiratory health risk from air pollution in the region. Note: this document relates to regional air quality monitoring and does not contain information about Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    TagsAir Quality Monitors, community engagement, PM25, PSCAA, Ultrafine Particulates
  • 2024-06-26

    Airborne nanoparticle concentrations are associated with increased mortality risk in Canada’s two largest cities

    A Canadian research study found that exposure to airborne nanoparticles is linked to higher mortality risk in Toronto and Montreal. The study, published in 2024 and funded by the Health Effects Institute, analyzed particle concentration data across Canada's two largest cities to assess long-term health impacts. While focused on urban air quality in Canada, the findings contribute to broader scientific understanding of how fine airborne particles from traffic and other sources affect public health.
    TagsAcademic Journals, Health, PM25, Ultrafine Particulates
  • Washington Air Monitoring Network: Air Quality Program

    Washington State Department of Ecology
    CategoriesResources TagsAir Quality Monitors, Ecology, PM25
  • UWDEOHS-PM particle size

    An educational diagram comparing the sizes of airborne particulate matter categories: PM0.1 (ultrafine particles, 0.1 microns), PM2.5 (combustion particles, organic compounds, metals; <2.5 microns), and PM10 (dust, pollen, mold; <10 microns). These are shown relative to a human hair (50–70 microns in diameter) and fine beach sand (90 microns in diameter).
    TagsDEOHS, Health, PM25, Ultrafine Particulates, UWDEOHS
  • Washington State Department of Ecology – Air Quality Index Map, Seattle/Sea-Tac Region

    Screenshot of Washington's Air Monitoring Network interactive map (Air Quality Program, WDOE, version 2.73.4.19) showing PM2.5 Air Quality Index readings across the greater Seattle–Sea-Tac–Puget Sound area. All visible monitoring stations display green indicators (Good, AQI 0–50).
    TagsAir Quality Monitors, Ecology, Health, Map, PM25
  • Effects of Ultrafine Particles

    Infographic from Daily News, illustrated by staff artist Warren Huskey, explaining how atmospheric ultrafine particles (diameter less than 0.1 micrometers) enter the human body and cause adverse health effects including possible brain cancer, heart attacks, and liver invasion. It details particle size comparisons (PM10, PM2.5, and ultrafines) relative to human hair thickness of 60 microns.
    TagsAviation Emissions, Health, PM25, UFP, Ultrafine Particulates
  • Who Gets to Breathe Clean Air in New Delhi?

    A visual story of pollution in New Delhi. A great explainer on PM25.
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsPM25, pollution
  • Relative sizes of various allergens

    Diagram comparing the sizes of common airborne particles including human hair (50–70 microns), pollen (30–50 microns), ragweed (17–23 microns), dust mite (10 microns), and a 1-micron reference marker. The illustration uses scaled circles to visually represent relative particle sizes, relevant to air quality and filtration contexts.
    Tagsair filtration, Air Quality Monitors, Allergens, Health, indoor air quality, PM25, pollution
  • 2019-04-17

    Estimated long-term (1981−2016) concentrations of ambient fine particulate matter across North America from chemical transport modeling, satellite remote sensing, and ground-based measurements

    Researchers estimated historical fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution levels across North America from 1981 to 2016 by combining satellite data, computer modeling, and ground-based measurements. The study found that average PM2.5 concentrations fell dramatically over the period, dropping from 22 μg per cubic meter in 1981 to about 7.9 μg per cubic meter in 2016. While this research focuses on air quality rather than airport noise, it provides a scientific framework for tracking long-term environmental exposure trends relevant to public health policy.
    TagsAmerican Chemical Society, Environmental Science & Technology, PM25, pollution
  • 2017-05-11

    Modeling variability in air pollution-related health damages from individual airport emissions

    Researchers used advanced air quality modeling to estimate the health impacts of emissions from 66 U.S. airports, including how pollution from each individual airport contributes to premature deaths. The study found wide variation in health damage across airports, driven largely by nearby population density and local atmospheric conditions. These findings can help inform emissions control policies at specific airports to better protect public health.
    TagsEnvironment, O3, Ozone, PM25, pollution
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Where’s my John Dingell?" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V