Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagSTCP(18)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2026-01-06

    Summary of newspaper supplement questionnaire responses

    This document summarizes community responses to a questionnaire distributed as part of the Sea-Tac Communities Plan, asking residents near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport about preferred noise mitigation strategies. Respondents most commonly favored acquiring and removing existing buildings for noise-compatible uses, purchase guarantees for residential properties, and other locally-suggested ideas. The survey also captured opinions on open space use, environmental controls, and neighborhood improvement priorities such as greenbelts, parks, and street improvements.
    TagsAirport Noise Report, Noise, Sea-Tac Airport, STCP
  • 2026-01-06

    Response to comments on the Sea-Tac/Communities Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement

    This document is a formal response to public comments on the Sea-Tac/Communities Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement, addressing concerns about the airport's Noise Remedy Program. It explains that noise program classifications for petition signers were upgraded due to factors such as summer flight patterns and proximity to approach paths, and that most signers were moved into the Purchase Guarantee area or recommended for the Cost Sharing Insulation Program. The response also notes that no specific schedule exists for noise remedy implementation due to uncertainties in federal funding, and that detailed land-use planning for acquisition areas will involve full citizen participation after properties are acquired.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Noise, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, STCP
  • 2023-08-22

    Exploratory draft: Post project coordination study

    This exploratory draft outlines a proposed Post Project Coordination Study for the Sea-Tac Communities Plan, designed to ensure that implementation programs are carried out effectively. It identifies seven key program areas requiring coordination, including noise reduction, drainage improvements, community action, zoning guidelines, capital improvements, and legislative advocacy. The document calls for a methodical study to analyze coordination needs, define responsibilities, and assign authorities across agencies such as the Port of Seattle, King County, and the FAA.
    TagsKing County, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Communities Plan, STCP
  • STCP Noise Impact Program One (Acquisition-Open Space)

    TagsEd Parks, Sea-Tac Communities Plan, STCP
  • Sea-Tac Communities Plan News September 1973

    TagsSea-Tac Communities Plan, STCP
  • 1983-04-26

    Letter to Port Of Seattle Commissioners regarding STCP and maximum compatibility

    In this April 26, 1983 letter to the Port of Seattle Commissioners, resident Virginia E. Dare urges the commission to honor its commitment to 'maximum compatibility' between Sea-Tac Airport and surrounding neighborhoods, as originally promised under the Sea-Tac Community Plan (STCP) launched in 1972. The letter emphasizes that community members were guaranteed a direct, ongoing role in planning decisions—including noise mitigation, land acquisition, and density guidelines—through a formal Community Involvement Program. The author calls on commissioners to uphold that process as they enter a new noise remedy program update that will reassess FAA density guidelines affecting nearby residents.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAirport Committees, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, STCP
  • 1979-11-14

    Letter to Arthur H. Yoshioka re: North Sea-Tac Park planning

    A November 1979 FAA letter to the Port of Seattle expresses support for a 'Modified Passive 2' conceptual plan for the proposed North Sea-Tac Park, while urging that any final park plan carefully weigh adverse impacts on adjacent residential neighborhoods and airport operations. The letter emphasizes that residents in the immediate study area should have meaningful input into the final park plan, and calls for close collaboration among the Port, King County, consultants, and citizens to minimize conflicts between park uses and the unique challenges posed by proximity to a major airport.
    TagsFAA, North Sea-Tac Park, Port Of Seattle, Robert O. Brown, STCP
  • 1977-09-27

    Letter from Port of Seattle Executive Director Richard D. Ford regarding Concorde aircraft noise concerns

    In this September 1977 letter, Port of Seattle Executive Director Richard D. Ford responds to a community member's concerns about the Concorde supersonic jet, expressing alarm that the Federal Government amended its noise regulations to allow a noisier aircraft to operate at U.S. airports. Ford warns this decision undermines the Sea-Tac/Communities Plan, which was built on the expectation that aircraft would become progressively quieter over time. He calls on the federal government, airlines, and aircraft manufacturers to aggressively pursue quieter engine technology as a necessary solution to airport noise problems.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsNoise, Port Of Seattle, Richard D. Ford, Sea-Tac Airport, STCP, Supersonic
  • 1977-05-26

    Letter to Charles Schuh regarding Barbara Summers and Policy Advisory Committee membership

    In this May 26, 1977 letter, Port of Seattle Chairman Donald G. Shay responds to a request from the Westside Hilltop Survival Committee to make Barbara Summers a full voting member of the Policy Advisory Committee (PAC). Shay explains that Summers currently serves as an alternate representative for the Westside area and expresses his personal opposition to expanding PAC membership solely to add another Westside representative. He agrees, however, to place the matter on the next PAC meeting agenda for consideration by the full membership.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAdvisory Committees, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, STCP
  • 1976-07-09

    Sea-Tac/communities plan memo: Final plan corrections and additions

    A July 9, 1976 internal memo from Ed Parks to holders of the 'Redbook' (Final Sea-Tac Communities Plan), a joint planning effort by the Port of Seattle and King County. The memo instructs recipients to insert enclosed additions and corrections into their copies of the plan, specifying which pages in sections 6.2 through 7.0 should be deleted and replaced. Chapter 7 was included in the packet, and recipients were directed to call 587-4630 for further information.
    TagsEd Parks, King County, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Communities Plan, STCP

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Port Of Seattle Commission memorandum – Airport Sustainability Master Plan" — , 2012

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V