-
The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to helping people under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!Most Recent: Ep #37 Dear City Managers
The Issues
The Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) is the blueprint for increasing flight capacity by one third in the next ten years. It will have the same community impact as the Third Runway. In fact, it is happening now. How this is possible, and what it means for us.continue...
A two minute presentation on how the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) will increase flight operations at Sea-Tac Airport as much as a new runway. Without a new runway.continue...
Does your home have a Port Package of noise mitigation windows and insulation? Having problems with your windows? Mold? You're not alone. Help us help you.continue... -
The SAMP SEPA EIS Public Comment Period is open now from May 22 – July 21, 2026. Learn what is coming and what you can do to help reduce the noise, the pollution, and obtain the compensation we’ve deserved for decades.Top Story
Port of Seattle Commission Meeting July 9, 2026 Postgame
July 11, 2026
SAMP NTP DEIS Listening Session
The Commission convened a special meeting in response to community concerns regarding the SAMP NTP DEIS. The idea seems to have originated as demand for a public hearing to review the draft under state law. The Port responded positively but without specifying a format.
STNI wrote the Commission to request a special meeting in order to allow for the Commissioners to attend under Open Public Meetings Act rules--which turned out to be the format of the event.
Regardless, Port staff claimed there was no 'arm twisting' the Commissioners to do the event. They insisted that Commissioners wanted to hear from residents. However, concerns had been expressed as to how to conduct the event. Under state law, once a SEPA process begins, electeds cannot appear to influence or interfere with a development project's environmental review process in any way.
Yes, this is confusing (and arguably a bit convenient.) After all, the Port of Seattle is both the project applicant, project reviewer, and ultimately the project approver. Nevertheless, this is the official explanation of the 'listening without commenting' format.
As Commission President Calkins said, this was a meeting of the Commission allocating ninety minutes for one agenda item: public comment on one topic: the SAMP NTP DEIS.
The meeting ran slightly over time, accommodating every person who had signed up and also asking for latecomers both virtually and in the room. Everyone who wanted to speak was given the same two minutes. Over two hours and eight minutes, we counted 44 speakers which we can summarize as follows:
Con (32):
Former Senator Karen Keiser, Burien Mayor Sarah Moore, Former Burien City Councilmember Debi Wagner, State Senator Tina Orwall, Des Moines Mayor Yoshiko Grace Matsui, Caffrey, 350 Seattle Laura Gibbons, Mendes, Achziger, DeVito, Harbaugh, Parfitt, Deming, Jenner, Casey, Wong, Harris, Kroeker, Omar, Cook, Shields (SeaTac city planner), Judy Davies, Paulson, Lebeg, Booth, Hunt, David Davies, Fedor, Veloria, Kresley, DeLacy, DusenburyPro-expansion (12):
Mayor Mullet (Issaquah), Scott Kennedy (Alaska Air), Leo (Bellevue Chamber), Ericson (Seattle Metro Chamber), Sills (DSA), Coughlin-Games (Snoqualmie Chamber), Randazzo (MSC Cruises), Heatherington (LiUNA), Balden (Building Trades), Brown, Pitts, Gargalo (all carpenters)Roughly 73% con to 27% pro — The pro side split cleanly into two blocs: regional chambers/business (Leo, Ericson, Sills, Coughlin-Games, Mullet) making a "region needs capacity or loses competitiveness" argument, and building trades/labor (Heatherington, Balden, Brown, Pitts, Gargalo) making a straight jobs argument. Airlines and cruise lines (Kennedy, Randazzo) rounded it out with an operational-necessity pitch. None of the pro speakers addressed mitigation, health data, or fence-line impact directly — they argued past it, not against it.
In recent months there has also been a steady stream of other pro voices--including the mayors of Kent, Redmond and Bellevue.
The con side's tenor was overwhelmingly not anti-growth. Almost every fence-line speaker said some version of "We know this is happening, we're not asking you to stop it" — Harbaugh, Paulson, David Davies, Veloria all said it almost verbatim — before pivoting to the actual ask: recurring mitigation, not one-time grants (Matsui, Caffrey, Mendes, Achziger, DeLacy), a per-city cumulative impact table (Wong, Booth — nearly identical language, likely coordinated), and challenges to the "no significant impact" finding itself (Wagner, Jenner, Dusenbury, Shields). Health/science framing came from Orwall, Keiser, DeVito, Lebeg, and Fedor.
Two comments mentioned the North of NERA Rezone -- aka 'Cedarhurst'. The increase in negative impacts in the area are very real, but the rezone decision is up to the Burien City Council--not the Port of Seattle.
One commenter mentioned remaining gaps in school and library sound insulation. True. However, Highline School has repeatedly received Port (and federal elected) priority in funding sound insulation--even obtaining those funds outside the Part 150 process.
After the meeting more than one Commissioner expressed surprise that there had not been more of a call for an extension to the comment period--even though that had been an official ask from the three cities.
Out of 32 con-side speakers, exactly one — Rebecca Deming, Des Moines' SEPA responsible official — explicitly asked for a comment-period extension. She was specific and to the point: repeated city requests denied or left "under consideration," 60 days covering multiple holidays, thousands of pages, years of Port prep time versus 60 days of public review.
Stuart Jenner gestured at the same problem ("60 days goes very fast when the data is from different years") without using the word extension or making a direct ask. Sandy Hunt cited the July 21st deadline as a fact, not a grievance.
Recent Stories
-
Ep #37 Dear City Managers
What if the solution to decades of airport noise and community impacts has been hiding in plain sight all along? In this open letter to city managers across airport communities, we revisit a landmark yet largely forgotten document: the Sea-Tac Communities Plan of 1976. Built on the Port of Seattle's promise — *"As we do better, you'll do better"* — this collaborative plan was supposed to be the long-term answer for neighborhoods living under the flight path. So why has it been reduced to little more than an expensive property buyout program? The answer reveals a critical gap that neither elected officials nor community advocates can fill alone. Real, lasting solutions require sustained professional commitment to airport community planning — something that should have been established 50 years ago. If you work in city management, this episode speaks directly to you and the unique role only you can play in finally delivering on that broken promise. -
SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
It’s all about construction permits The Sustainable Airport Master Plan Near Term Projects Draft Environmental Impact Statement is a description of the effects of the largest expansion in airport history. But at bottom, it consists of thirty-one construction projects. What we find striking is the absence of detail on most of those projects. In most -
A letter to the Port of Seattle Commission – make July 9 a special meeting
Port staff have said there will be some form of listening session at the airport on July 9, in the same room that Port Commission meetings are held, and recorded, as are all Commission meetings. But thus far there has been no confirmation that any of the Commissioners will be in attendance. We sent this -
Ep #36 Orphans
**Discover why environmental progress stalled for airport communities while cars got cleaner** Ever wonder why your car's emissions have dramatically improved over decades, but aviation seems stuck in the past? In this eye-opening episode of The Airport Communities Podcast, we explore the fascinating tale of two environmental paths that diverged after 1970. While Washington Senator Scoop Jackson spearheaded NEPA—one of the largest expansions of environmental policy in American history—and California secured game-changing carve-outs in the Clean Air Act that led to massive air quality improvements, aviation somehow got left behind. Despite Boeing being headquartered in Washington, aviation environmental standards never caught up. UW Meteorologist Cliff Mass delivers some stark perspective: those two annual flights to Europe generate more greenhouse gases than most people produce in their entire homes over a year. Meanwhile, Boeing's monopoly status has eliminated market incentives for cleaner technology. This wasn't an oversight—it was intentional. Today, every airport community continues paying the price for decisions made decades ago that exempted aviation from automotive-level engineering standards. -
Port of Seattle Glacier Middle School Open House
Attending a Port of Seattle open house can feel like going through the motions — and that's exactly the point. After visiting the first of four SAMP open houses at Glacier Middle School, we're giving you an honest preview of what to expect: low turnout, recycled poster boards, and out-of-town consultants who fly in, answer questions, and fly right back out. But here's what matters most: if you're frustrated about airport expansion, noise, and public health impacts, you're likely directing your anger at the wrong people. Port staff don't set policy. The real accountability gap lies with your elected officials — city councilmembers and Port Commissioners — who have had decades to monitor and respond to expansion plans that were effectively decided before the Third Runway even opened. We'll tell you exactly who deserves your attention, why these open houses primarily serve the Port's FAA checkbox requirements, and what a more effective strategy for community advocacy actually looks like.
-
Upcoming Events

Agenda Item: 2026 Aviation Noise & Emissions Symposium Summary Document Link
[...]
From the Office of Congressman Adam Smith: Highline College (Building 8, Mt. Townsend Room)Des Moines, WA Saturday, July 18 • 1 PM – 2 PM Join Rep. Adam Smith for an Aviation Forum. Attendees will have questions and concerns about aviation noise and emissions. RSVP today! Representative Adam Smith is hosting an aviation forum with
[...]
From The Web
Sea-Tac Airport sits at the intersection of several PFAS risk factors that make the UCMR 6 proposal especially significant for surrounding communities. Airports are **among the highest-risk PFAS contamination sites** in the country. Sea-Tac has historically used AFFF for fire suppression training and emergency response - AFFF contains high concentrations of PFOS and PFOA, the most well-studied PFAS compounds - These chemicals **migrate readily into groundwater** and do not break down naturally./ - The airport sits on a **glacial outwash plain** with highly permeable soils - This geology **accelerates PFAS movement** into groundwater - Surrounding communities including **Burien, Des Moines, [...]
From The Library
Under The Flight Path
Under The Flight Path: A Community History of Sea-Tac Airport. Help us complete the first comprehensive documentary of any major US airport; the impacts on the cities and the people.continue...
FAQs
