Home Page 3-col (2024)

  • The Podcast!


    Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to helping people under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!

    Most Recent: Ep #41 Port Package Updates... update (Raw!)


    The Issues

    The Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) is the blueprint for increasing flight capacity by one third in the next ten years. It will have the same community impact as the Third Runway. In fact, it is happening now. How this is possible, and what it means for us.
    continue...


    Does your home have a Port Package of noise mitigation windows and insulation? Having problems with your windows? Mold? You're not alone. Help us help you.
    continue...
  • The SAMP SEPA EIS Public Comment Period is open now from May 22 - August 20, 2026. Learn what is coming and what you can do to help reduce the noise, the pollution, and obtain the compensation we've deserved for decadesThe SAMP SEPA EIS Public Comment Period is open now from May 22 – August 20, 2026. Learn what is coming and what you can do to help reduce the noise, the pollution, and obtain the compensation we’ve deserved for decades.

    Top Story

    Ep #41 Port Package Updates… update (Raw!)

    September 7, 2026

    A mid-year update for people with sound insulation issues. We've spent so much time this year working on the SAMP you may think you've been forgotten. Not even.

    Sound insulation should be a basic right, not an after-thought.

    The Port of Seattle conducted a new Part 150 Study as part of the SAMP. They use that noise study to further its expansion plans. A large portion of our advocacy on the SAMP has been towards get you the relief you deserve.

    The Port proposed a Port Package update program in 2024 but has slow-walked the process since then. There is ongoing window-dressing and even opposition from some of the affected city councils which is beyond shameful. State Senator Tina Orwall will be putting forward new State legislation in January to help break the log jam. That is where you come in.

    Last year's attempt was (sorry) not great. People threw their support behind bills that had no chance of passing.

    Part 150 dnl65 sea tac vs. kcia boeing fieldIn the meantime, we hear more and more from you orphans--people who bought a house that was eligible for sound insulation--before you bought it, but now is not. Many of you are in a dead zone--closer to Boeing Field, but part of the Port of Seattle's jurisdiction.

     

    This will take money from the Port, from the State, from the FAA. It can't be one or the other. Everyone must contribute.

    To get that done, we will need everyone's help--including you orphans--to make sure that we get right legislation proposed and then get it passed.

    Next up? A series of stories on the Sea-Tac Communities Plan, and our 2027 Legislative Agenda.

    To learn how you can make a difference:

    Recent Stories

    • CAWG Postgame: Regional Airport System?

      Peter Kirsch explains how three separate airports could act like one This week’s Commercial Aviation Work Group meeting made clear that this is not a second airport committee. The main event was a presentation by Peter Kirsch. You can believe what Mr. Kirsch says because, in addition to being a principal at one of the
    • American Airlines makes no money—But it will spend millions on Trump Accounts to build goodwill in Washington

      by Gary Leff on August 31, 2026 American Airlines will contribute $1,000 to Trump Accounts opened for eligible children of its employees, matching the federal government’s $1,000 seed contribution. This is a parting gift from Nate Gatten to the administration as he leaves to head government relations for Apple, and helps to set the airline
    • Ep #40 Thank you, Explorer!

      What if the solution to decades of airport noise and community impacts has been hiding in plain sight all along? In this open letter to city managers across airport communities, we revisit a landmark yet largely forgotten document: the Sea-Tac Communities Plan of 1976. Built on the Port of Seattle's promise — *"As we do better, you'll do better"* — this collaborative plan was supposed to be the long-term answer for neighborhoods living under the flight path. So why has it been reduced to little more than an expensive property buyout program? The answer reveals a critical gap that neither elected officials nor community advocates can fill alone. Real, lasting solutions require sustained professional commitment to airport community planning — something that should have been established 50 years ago. If you work in city management, this episode speaks directly to you and the unique role only you can play in finally delivering on that broken promise.
    • SAMP Public Comment Template

      Ideas and easy instructions to help you make a meaningful impact on the largest expansion in airport history. Deadline is 5:00pm August 20, 2026
    • Ep #39 Port of Seattle Listening Session 2 Postgame (Raw!)

      What if the solution to decades of airport noise and community impacts has been hiding in plain sight all along? In this open letter to city managers across airport communities, we revisit a landmark yet largely forgotten document: the Sea-Tac Communities Plan of 1976. Built on the Port of Seattle's promise — *"As we do better, you'll do better"* — this collaborative plan was supposed to be the long-term answer for neighborhoods living under the flight path. So why has it been reduced to little more than an expensive property buyout program? The answer reveals a critical gap that neither elected officials nor community advocates can fill alone. Real, lasting solutions require sustained professional commitment to airport community planning — something that should have been established 50 years ago. If you work in city management, this episode speaks directly to you and the unique role only you can play in finally delivering on that broken promise.

    [See all stories…]

  • Upcoming Events

    [See all...]



    From The Web

    [See all…]


    From The Library

    As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
    continue...

    [See all…]


    Under The Flight Path

    Under The Flight Path: A Community History of Sea-Tac Airport. Help us complete the first comprehensive documentary of any major US airport; the impacts on the cities and the people.
    continue...

    FAQs

    [See all…]

V V