Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagHighline Community(23)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2022-11-29

    Your 2¢ Worth Meeting #4: Community Planning — A Game?

    Minutes from a community planning workshop (Meeting #4) in which residents from neighborhoods near Sea-Tac Airport — including Valley View, Riverton Heights, Marvista, Des Moines, North Hill, Shorewood, and Highline College — identified what they valued most about their communities, such as natural scenery, views, schools, and open space. Participants also discussed what regulations might be needed to protect those qualities, including building height controls, green belt preservation, clean-air policies, and safe pedestrian pathways. A comprehensive land use plan was proposed that would balance residential, industrial, recreational, and conservation needs while ensuring local residents have a meaningful voice in decisions affecting their neighborhoods.
    Tagscommunity engagement, Highline Community, Land Use, Sea-Tac Communities Plan, STCP
  • 2022-11-16

    City of SeaTac update: Highline Forum meeting

    This November 2022 City of SeaTac presentation to the Highline Forum provides a snapshot of the city's key statistics, highlighting its diverse community of approximately 32,000 residents who speak more than 85 languages. The city also serves as a major regional hub, with around 6,000 hotel rooms, roughly 35,000 employees working within city boundaries, and more than 140,000 people passing through daily.
    TagsCity Of SeaTac, community engagement, Highline Community, Highline Forum
  • 2022-08-27

    By-Laws of the Highline Community Council

    The Highline Community Council is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization representing residents of the Highline School District #401 area, governed by ten elected and fifteen appointed members drawn from five high school service districts. The Council's stated goals include liaising between the community and government, promoting orderly development, and encouraging civic participation. Members must be at least 18 years old and reside within the Highline Community boundaries.
    Tagscivic participation, community development, Highline Community, Highline Community Council
  • Highline community council by laws pdf
    2022-08-27

    By-Laws of the Highline Community Council

    By-laws of the Highline Community Council, an independent, non-profit, non-partisan community organization serving the Highline School District #401 geographic area. Covers organizational structure (ten elected representatives from five high school service areas, fifteen appointed members, Associates), Executive Committee composition (President, Vice-President, Recording Secretary, Corresponding Secretary, Treasurer), objectives, council membership eligibility (age 18+, residence within Highline
    Tagscivic participation, community development, Highline Community, Highline Community Council
  • 1982-08-20

    Final Designation Report: Hillgrove Cemetery Community Landmark

    The King County Landmarks Commission formally designated Hillgrove Cemetery, located on 200th Street South between 15th and 16th Streets, as a community landmark on August 12, 1982. The cemetery, owned by the Hillgrove Cemetery Association, was recognized for containing the graves of settlers and pioneers significant to the development of the Highline area near what is now the Sea-Tac region. The designation protects the cemetery's plots, gravestones, entrance, trees, and landscape features from alteration without Commission approval.
    TagsHighline Community, Hillgrove Cemetery, Historic Preservation, King County
  • 1982-08-12

    Highline Community Council Meeting Minutes, August 12, 1982

    Minutes from the Highline Community Council meeting held August 12, 1982, covering local governance topics including a discussion on the proposed incorporation of Highline, a King County Council decision to pursue senior housing instead of a planned Civic Center, and updates from the Citizens to Save Puget Sound Committee. The council also approved sending congratulations to a newly appointed Metro Council member and scheduled a candidates night event for October before the General Election.
    TagsGreater Highline Community Parks Board, Highline Community, Highline Community Council, King County Council, Puget Sound
  • Highline community council minutes 1982 08 12 pdf
    1982-08-12

    Highline Community Council Meeting Minutes, August 12, 1982

    Minutes of the Highline Community Council meeting held August 12, 1982, prepared by Secretary Karen Verner. Topics include proposed incorporation of Highline and King County Boundary Review Board proceedings summarized by Joe Breidenbach and Dottie Harper; King County Council decision to adopt a senior housing plan instead of a Civic Center for the Highline area;
    TagsGreater Highline Community Parks Board, Highline Community, Highline Community Council, King County Council, Puget Sound
  • Westside Hilltop v. King County

    Westside Hilltop v. King County 96 Wn.2d 171 (1981) 634 P.2d 862 WESTSIDE HILLTOP SURVIVAL COMMITTEE, ET AL, Appellants, v. KING COUNTY, ET AL, Respondents. No. 46982-2. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. October 8, 1981. *172 Roger M. Leed and Jeffrey M. Eustis, for appellants. Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Susan R. Agid,
    CategoriesFrom The Web, History TagsAppearance of Fairness Doctrine, Boeing, HCP, Highline Community, King County, King County Council, Westside Hilltop Survival Committee
  • Highline communities land use plan north issue 15 zoning amendment 1981 pdf
    1981-01-27

    North Issue #15: Highline Communities Land Use Plan Map Zoning Amendment

    North Issue #15 zoning amendment for Highline Communities Land Use Plan Map, dated 1-27-81. Recommends reclassifying property from ML (Light Manufacturing) to SR (Single Family Residential) at 1 unit per acre. Area Zoning page 83 amendment adds SR zoning designation replacing ML. Includes panel-recommended amendment to pg. 82 and pg. 83 of the Area Zoning
    TagsAirport Open Use Zoning, Highline Community, Highline Community Plan, Land Use
  • 1981-01-27

    North Issue #15: Highline Communities Land Use Plan Map Zoning Amendment

    North Issue #15 addresses a zoning change proposal for a property in the Highline Communities area near Sea-Tac Airport. The property, currently zoned ML (Light Manufacturing), was the subject of a panel-recommended amendment dated January 27, 1981, proposing a reclassification to SR (Single Family Residential) at a density of one unit per acre. The recommended changes would update both the Highline Communities Land Use Plan Map and the Area Zoning pages to reflect the shift from industrial to single-family use.
    TagsAirport Open Use Zoning, Highline Community, Highline Community Plan, Land Use

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR007716: Declaration of Erik Stockdale — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-133" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V