Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagNoise Pollution(35)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2026-07-21

    Quiet Communities, Inc. et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al., Case No. 23-cv-1649 (JMC) — Memorandum opinion and order

    A federal court ruled in 2023 that the EPA had unreasonably delayed for over 40 years in carrying out its legal duties under the Noise Control Act of 1972, which requires the agency to regulate environmental noise, publish noise-related reports, and help state and local governments develop noise control programs. Although President Reagan defunded the EPA's noise office in 1982, Congress never actually repealed the Noise Control Act, meaning the EPA's obligations under the law remained in force. The court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, finding the EPA's inaction on four key counts unlawful.
    TagsEnvironmental Protection Agency, EPA, FAA, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet Communities
  • 23 16 1649 quiet communities v EPA pdf
    2026-07-21

    Quiet Communities, Inc. et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al., Case No. 23-cv-1649 (JMC) — Memorandum opinion and order

    A federal court ruled in 2023 that the EPA had unreasonably delayed for over 40 years in carrying out its legal duties under the Noise Control Act of 1972, which requires the agency to regulate environmental noise, publish noise-related reports, and help state and local governments develop noise control programs. Although President Reagan defunded the EPA's noise office in 1982, Congress never actually repealed the Noise Control Act, meaning the EPA's obligations under the law remained in force. The court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, finding the EPA's inaction on four key counts unlawful.
    TagsEnvironmental Protection Agency, EPA, FAA, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet Communities
  • 23 16 1649 quiet communities v EPA memo and opinion pdf
    2026-07-16

    Quiet Communities, Inc. v. EPA: Memorandum Opinion and Order (Case No. 23-cv-1649)

    U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia memorandum opinion and order in Quiet Communities, Inc. et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al., Case No. 23-cv-1649 (JMC), filed July 16, 2026. Judge grants in part and denies in part cross-motions for summary judgment. Court finds EPA unreasonably delayed implementing the Noise Control
    TagsEnvironmental Protection Agency, EPA, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet Communities
  • 2026-07-16

    Quiet Communities, Inc. v. EPA: Memorandum Opinion and Order (Case No. 23-cv-1649)

    A federal court ruled in July 2026 that the EPA has unlawfully delayed carrying out its duties under the Noise Control Act of 1972, a law that has remained on the books even though the agency effectively shut down its noise control program in 1982 after Congress approved President Reagan's budget cuts. The lawsuit, brought by Quiet Communities, Inc. and Jeanne Kempthorne, argued that over forty years of EPA inaction on noise regulation violated the agency's legal obligations. The court granted partial summary judgment for the plaintiffs on four counts, finding the decades-long delay unreasonable, while dismissing other claims for lack of jurisdiction or failure on the merits.
    TagsEnvironmental Protection Agency, EPA, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet Communities
  • 2025-12-09

    Vashon Island Fair Skies – What changed?

    A document explaining changes to aircraft arrival patterns at SeaTac airport around 2015, including the introduction of Performance Based Navigation (PBN) technology and lowered flight altitudes. The changes concentrated flight paths over Vashon Island in a narrow corridor, causing increased noise pollution for residents who chose to live there for its peaceful environment.
    TagsFAA, Noise Pollution, PBN, Performance Based Navigation, Sea-Tac Airport
  • Whatnextgendidtovashon Onepager Pdf
    2025-12-09

    Vashon Island Fair Skies – What changed?

    A document explaining changes to aircraft arrival patterns at SeaTac airport around 2015, including the introduction of Performance Based Navigation (PBN) technology and lowered flight altitudes. The changes concentrated flight paths over Vashon Island in a narrow corridor, causing increased noise pollution for residents who chose to live there for its peaceful environment.
    TagsFAA, Noise Pollution, PBN, Performance Based Navigation, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2024-05-13

    Comment letter on the Washington Aviation System Plan (WASP) draft report

    A letter from the City of Burien to WSDOT criticizes the 2017 Washington Aviation System Plan (WASP) for failing to address the health and environmental impacts of growing aircraft noise and air pollution on communities near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The letter argues that the plan focuses too narrowly on aviation and economic development while ignoring issues such as hearing loss, poor student performance, sleep disruption, and asthma affecting lower-income and ethnically diverse neighborhoods. The author calls on WSDOT and regional governments to explore alternative airport locations to relieve the disproportionate burden placed on South King County communities.
    TagsCity of Burien, Noise Pollution, Sea-Tac Airport, Washington Aviation System Plan, WASP
  • 2024-05-09

    Population health implications of exposure to pervasive military aircraft noise pollution

    A 2024 study published in the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology assessed the public health impacts of military aircraft noise from Naval Air Station Whidbey Island in Washington State, finding that over 74,000 residents were at risk of adverse health effects including annoyance, sleep disturbance, hearing impairment, and delays in childhood learning. Researchers integrated seven years of acoustic monitoring data with flight operations records and noise simulation models to map noise exposure across six counties in northwestern Washington. The study's findings and open-source workflow offer a reproducible tool for evaluating population health risks from aviation noise, with broader applications for informing noise policy, land use planning, and mitigation efforts.
    TagsGrowler Jets, Military Aviation, Noise Pollution, United States Navy, Whidbey Island
  • 2024-05-06

    Testimony on HB 1683: Establishing an Aviation Coordinating Commission

    Burien resident and former Boeing Field Noise Officer Sharyn Parker testified in support of HB 1683, arguing that the Port of Seattle deliberately understated Sea-Tac Airport's growth projections to avoid alarming nearby communities, while simultaneously planning a multi-billion dollar expansion — leaving residents exposed to increasing noise and emissions without adequate mitigation. She points to the Port's 2013-2018 Part 150 Noise Study becoming outdated just two years after approval, and a four-year delay in implementing approved sound insulation measures, as evidence of mismanagement and misleading communications. Parker and coalition members are calling for nighttime cargo flights to be offloaded to a new regional airport, contending that Sea-Tac has exhausted both its physical footprint and airspace capacity.
    TagsHB1683, Noise Pollution, Part 150, Quiet Skies Coalition, Sea-Tac Airport
  • Rbv vs netherlands schiphol echr article8 noise court case summary 2024 04 10 pdf
    2024-04-10

    RBV vs. the State (Netherlands): Court Case Summary — Citizens Group Against Dutch State to Restore Protection Against Aviation Noise Nuisance at Schiphol Airport

    Andrea Keessen of Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands) summarizes the District Court of The Hague ruling ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2024:3734 (20 March 2024) in RBV (Stichting Recht op Bescherming tegen Vliegtuighinder) vs. the State of the Netherlands. The court found the Dutch State violated Article 8 ECHR (right to privacy/home) and Article 13 ECHR (right to effective
    TagsECHR, European Convention On Human Rights, IATA, Noise Pollution, Schiphol Airport

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Air Reform" — , 2018

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V