Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

Category : Correspondence(309)

Advanced Search Options

  • Tags
  • Dates
  • Media
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1981-12-08

    Memorandum of understanding: Boeing headquarters – reclassification of property

    This 1981 Memorandum of Understanding between the Port of Seattle and King County outlines terms for reclassifying approximately 30 acres of land on the west side of Sea-Tac International Airport to allow Boeing to develop a Corporate Headquarters Facility. The agreement includes provisions for the Port to lease 5 acres to King County for a neighborhood park at $1 per year, and restricts development on an adjacent 55-acre greenbelt buffer zone for at least 10 years. The document also affirms King County's zoning authority over non-airport-related land use at Sea-Tac and establishes a dispute resolution process between the two agencies.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsBoeing, King County, Port Of SeattleFolderProperties
  • 1981-10-16

    Zone III Committee Response to Airspace Study Advisory Committee Invitation

    Letter from Jean Pihlman, Coordinator of Zone III Committee, accepting invitation to participate in the Port of Seattle’s Airspace Study Advisory Committee. The committee designates Jean Pihlman as representative and Virginia Dana as alternate, offering cooperation for the study completion.
    CategoriesCorrespondence, History TagsAdvisory Committees, Airspace Study, Joe Sims, Zone 3 CommitteeFolderShared Airspace Study
  • 1981-09-13

    Letter to Editor about North Sea-Tac Park Land Use Guidelines

    A letter to the editor of Highline Times from Sea-Tac Communities Plan member Virginia Dana discussing the Port of Seattle’s acquisition of land north of Sea-Tac Airport for safety purposes and defending FAA density guidelines for the proposed North SeaTac Park. The author argues that the land was purchased to remove residents from an environmentally
    CategoriesCorrespondence, History TagsAirport Open Use Zoning, Highline Community Plan, Highline Times, North Sea-Tac Park, Sunset Park, Virginia DanaFolderHighline Community Plan
  • 1981-06-12

    Letter from Zone 3 residents to FAA Director Charles Foster regarding Noise Density Guidelines

    In a June 1981 letter to the FAA's Northwest Regional Director, Zone 3 citizen group representative Virginia E. Dana expresses qualified support for the FAA's recommended people-per-acre density guidelines for recreational use of North Sea-Tac Park, while raising concerns about safety and population exposure under flight paths. The letter highlights that the proposed recreational density of 40 people per acre across 53 acres could allow up to 2,120 people in an area from which only roughly 1,000 residents were displaced through the airport's land buyout program. Dana urges continued attention to airport safety criteria and environmental protection for communities living adjacent to Sea-Tac Airport.
    CategoriesCorrespondence, History TagsLand Use, North Sea-Tac Park, NSTP, Sunset Park, Zone 3 CommitteeFolderNSTP
  • 1981-06-09

    King County Department of Planning and Community Development: Letter to Virginia Dana Acknowledging Complaint Case 81-456

    A June 9, 1981 letter from King County's Building & Land Development division acknowledges receipt of a complaint filed by Mrs. Virginia Dana of Seattle, assigning it case number 81-456. The letter explains the county's process for handling code violations, which may include contacting the property owner by phone or letter, and potentially conducting a field inspection if a serious hazard exists. The division pledges to make every effort to bring the property into compliance with King County Codes.
    CategoriesCorrespondence Tagscommunity development, King County, Virginia DanaFolderKing County
  • King county bld 1981 06 09 complaint case 81 456 virginia dana pdf
    1981-06-09

    King County Department of Planning and Community Development: Letter to Virginia Dana Acknowledging Complaint Case 81-456

    Letter dated June 9, 1981 from Edward B. Sand, Manager of King County Building & Land Development Division, to Mrs. Virginia Dana, 2648 South 142nd Street, Seattle, WA 98168, acknowledging receipt of her complaint letter and assigning case number 81-456. The letter explains the complaint processing procedure including property ownership research, owner notification by telephone
    CategoriesCorrespondence Tagscommunity development, King County, Virginia DanaFolderKing County
  • 1981-01-31

    Letter to Times Troubleshooter regarding FAA guidelines

    In this January 21, 1981 letter to Janice Troubleshooter of Seattle, resident Virginia E. Dana raises concerns about the Port of Seattle's land acquisition near Sea-Tac International Airport for clear zones and safety areas. She questions whether FAA density guidelines and land use compatibility guidelines for aircraft noise environments are enforceable regulations or merely voluntary guidelines, and whether a proposed regional park plan is appropriate for these safety-sensitive zones. Dana calls for state legislation to give these guidelines regulatory teeth.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsFAA, FAA Density Guidelines, Port Of Seattle, Virginia DanaFolderSea-Tac Airport
  • 1981-01-15

    Letter regarding draft Regional Airport System Plan, 1980 to 2000

    A January 1981 letter from the Puget Sound Council of Governments invites citizens and agencies to review a draft Regional Airport System Plan covering 1980 to 2000, which outlines existing aviation facilities, projected needs, and recommendations for expanding several airports in the region. The plan also calls for construction of a new industrial/commuter airport in the King-Snohomish service area, though no specific site is identified. Public comments were due before February 27, 1981, with the King Subregional Council expected to vote on adoption in March 1981.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsHistory, King County, PSRCFolderStudies
  • 1981-01-14

    Port of Seattle Response to Community Concerns about Sea-Tac Airport

    Letter from Sea-Tac Airport Manager Oris W. Dunham Jr. to William C. Holstine addressing community concerns about airport operations, including land acquisition programs, noise mitigation, flight operations, and the North Sea-Tac Park development. The letter responds to a November 14 meeting and community questionnaire about Port of Seattle relationships with surrounding neighborhoods.
    CategoriesCorrespondence, History Tagscommunity engagement, Land Use, Noise Complaints, North Sea-Tac Park, Port Of SeattleFolderNoise Mitigation
  • 1980-11-21

    Letter from Port Of Seattle Airport Manager to William Holstine

    In this November 21, 1980 letter, Sea-Tac International Airport Manager Oris W. Dunham, Jr. acknowledges receipt of correspondence from community member William Holstine regarding concerns raised at a recent public meeting. Dunham promises a timely response to Holstine's questions and invites him to present to the PAC (Public Advisory) Committee at its next meeting. The letter reflects the airport's efforts to engage with neighboring community members over airport-related concerns, likely related to noise policy.
    CategoriesCorrespondence, Meetings TagsAdvisory Committees, History, Port Of SeattleFolderSea-Tac Airport

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 … Page 31
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to helping people under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!

Most Recent: Ep #42 Data, Data Centers, and you (Raw!)

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "5d9908f81f38d9bb8bd3303bcc6450da 680×0 c default" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V