Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

Category : Correspondence(309)

Advanced Search Options

  • Tags
  • Dates
  • Media
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2022-12-04

    November 29, 2022 Port Commission Meeting

    A letter to the Commissioners of the Port of Seattle regarding the 29 November Commission Meeting and passage of the Port’s 2023 Budget. Commissioners, Congratulations on passing the Port’s 2023 Budget at your 29 November meeting. Here are a few thoughts about that meeting, the budget you passed, and the year ahead: 1. There was not
    CategoriesCorrespondence, Meetings TagsPort Of Seattle Commission
  • 2022-10-17

    Comments on Docket Number FAA 2022-1203: Draft Policy regarding processing land use changes on federally acquired or federally conveyed airport land

    Charlotte Douglas International Airport (CLT) submitted comments to the FAA in October 2022 opposing a proposed new policy on land use changes at federally acquired airport land, arguing that existing regulations already adequately govern non-aeronautical land use. CLT requested that if the policy moves forward, the FAA clarify approval timelines, lease evaluation procedures, and criteria for mixed-use land decisions. The letter emphasizes that non-aeronautical development is essential for airports to remain financially self-sustaining and to ensure compatible land use around airport property.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAirport Layout Plans, Charlotte Douglas International Airport, FAA, Land UseFolderFAA
  • 2022-10-17

    ACI-NA comments on draft FAA policy regarding processing land use changes on federally acquired or federally conveyed airport land

    Airports Council International-North America (ACI-NA) submitted comments to the FAA in October 2022 opposing a draft policy that would impose new federal review and approval processes on how airports can use land that was federally acquired or conveyed. ACI-NA argued the policy is confusing, could lead to inconsistent decisions across FAA regional offices, and may delay airport development projects and increase costs. The organization urged the FAA to grandfather existing land use designations, clarify key undefined terms, and work collaboratively with airports to revise the policy.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAirport Improvement Program, Airports Council International, FAA, Land UseFolderFAA
  • 2022-10-17

    NASAO comments on draft FAA policy regarding processing land use changes on federally acquired or federally conveyed airport land

    The National Association of State Aviation Officials (NASAO) submitted comments to the FAA in October 2022 regarding a draft policy on land use changes at federally acquired or conveyed airport land. NASAO raised concerns about lengthy lease review processes, the lack of defined timelines for approvals, and unclear procedures for lease renewals and extensions. The letter also questioned how the policy would affect existing leases and called for greater consistency across FAA regions.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAirports, FAA, Land UseFolderFAA
  • 2022-10-17

    AAAE comments on draft FAA policy regarding processing land use changes on federally acquired or federally conveyed airport land

    The American Association of Airport Executives (AAAE) submitted formal comments in October 2022 opposing a proposed FAA policy that would require federal review of individual leases, subleases, and non-aeronautical development projects on federally acquired or conveyed airport land. AAAE argues the policy would reduce airport revenue, slow development, and exceed FAA's appropriate role, which should be limited to aviation safety oversight rather than involvement in specific real estate transactions. The organization urges FAA to maintain existing policies and work collaboratively with the airport industry on any needed improvements.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAAAE, FAA, Land UseFolderFAA
  • 2022-10-17

    Comments on the draft FAA policy regarding processing land use changes on federally acquired or federally conveyed airport land

    The Huntsville-Madison County Airport Authority submitted comments to the FAA in October 2022, objecting to a proposed federal policy governing land use changes on federally acquired or conveyed airport property. The authority argues the policy creates unnecessary regulatory burdens that hamper airports' ability to pursue compatible non-aeronautical developments, and calls for clearer, simpler rules — such as broader definitions of 'airport purpose' and airport-led category determinations rather than FAA approval for every land use change.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAirport Layout Plans, FAA, Land UseFolderFAA
  • 2022-07-28

    Opening Statement of Chairman Ro Khanna: Hearing on “Toxic Air: How Leaded Aviation Fuel Is Poisoning America’s Children”

    In a July 2022 congressional hearing, Chairman Ro Khanna highlighted the health dangers of leaded aviation fuel (Avgas) still used in small general aviation aircraft, noting that children near airports in communities of color face blood lead levels exceeding those seen during the Flint water crisis. The statement criticizes the FAA and EPA for failing to act urgently on phasing out leaded fuel, despite the existence of viable unleaded alternatives, and accuses oil companies and aviation industry groups of deliberately delaying the transition. Khanna calls on federal agencies to accelerate approval of lead-free fuel options, involve affected communities in decision-making, and use infrastructure funding to support the switch to unleaded aviation fuel.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAvGas, EPA, FAA, General Aviation, LeadFolderSAF
  • 2022-07-06

    Support Ordinance 2022-0011 regarding the health and climate impacts of King County International Airport (KCIA)

    Letter from KCIACC and community organizations supporting Ordinance 2022-0011, which calls for environmental and health impact assessments at King County International Airport and establishment of a community-led advisory committee. The letter emphasizes the need for community benefits agreements and environmental justice for communities disproportionately impacted by airport operations.
    CategoriesCorrespondence Tagscommunity engagement, Environmental Justice, KCIACC, King CountyFolderKCIA (Boeing Field)
  • 2022-03-06

    Invoice #1252 – ABCx2, LLC consulting services to County of Arlington, Phase II

    ABCx2, LLC submitted Invoice #1252 to Arlington County for $14,250.50, representing the final bill for Phase II consulting services related to airport noise analysis, including tasks such as a Fly Quiet Report, Volume 3 Report, NADP 1 vs. 2 Analysis, and community engagement activities. The project spanned April 2021 through February 2022, totaling 532.6 hours and $150,000 in consulting fees billed at $250 per hour across a team of consultants. The invoice was approved for payment on May 19, 2022, by Arlington County's Richard I. Roisman.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAdvisory Committees, Airport Committees, community engagement, VianairFolderVianair
  • 2022-02-05

    Invoice #1244 – ABCx2, LLC consulting services to County of Arlington, Phase II

    ABCx2, LLC submitted Invoice #1244 to Arlington County on February 5, 2022, for $4,687.50 in Phase II consulting services related to airport noise mitigation and flight procedure analysis. The work, covering January 2022, included community meeting preparation, review of GPS approach procedures and Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs), and meetings with county officials and aviation stakeholders. The invoice represents part of a larger $150,000 Phase II project, of which approximately $133,249.50 had been billed through January 2022.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAirport Noise Report, community engagement, VianairFolderVianair

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 … Page 31
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to helping people under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!

Most Recent: Ep #42 Data, Data Centers, and you (Raw!)

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "H.R.1048 – Aviation Noise and Emissions Mitigation Act" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V