Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

Category : Correspondence(303)

Advanced Search Options

  • Tags
  • Dates
  • Media
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-08-28

    EXH AR017854: Phone Message and Handwritten Notes — Letter from Board, Hearing March 18-29 2002

    Exhibit AR017854 from Hellwig exhibit collection (Exhibit No. 103, dated 1-8-02, M. Green). Phone message slip dated 8/28 at 2:50 from Joan Mpichoro (or similar) to Ray, noting a letter from the Board setting a hearing for March 18-29, 2002, with a please-call-back request. Accompanying handwritten notes dated 8-27-01 cover questions and ideas including: 4POS
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsACC, Handwritten Notes, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 08
  • 2001-05-01

    Exhibit 2211: Email from Scott Bender to Katie Walter Regarding Hydrologic Impacts to Wetland 39

    Email dated 5/1/01 from Scott Bender to Katie Walter transmitting an attached memo describing Bender’s opinions about hydrologic impacts to Wetland 39. AR 034818, ECY00021952, Exhibit-2211. Document relates to Ecology environmental review processes involving wetland hydrology assessment.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 14
  • 2001-03-01

    Truth in Aviation: The newsletter of the Regional Commission on Airport Affairs, Vol. 6, No. 4, Spring 2001

    A 2001 community newsletter documenting widespread opposition to Sea-Tac Airport's proposed third runway construction, which required destroying 18 acres of wetlands. Residents, local elected officials, and independent experts raised serious concerns about earthquake safety, environmental damage to local streams and salmon habitat, and the structural integrity of four unprecedented earthen retaining walls planned for the project. The Port of Seattle's applications were repeatedly challenged and withdrawn due to fatal flaws in environmental planning and seismic risk analysis.
    CategoriesCorrespondence, History TagsFlyer, RCAA, Regional Commission On Airport Affairs, Truth in AviationFolderRCAA
  • 2000-09-27

    EXH AR017924: Internal Email Chain — Dinsmore Draft 401 Denial Letter and Withdrawal Letter Review

    Internal email chain dated September 27, 2000, among Washington State Department of Ecology staff Tom Luster, Raymond Hellwig, Joan Marchioro (ATG), Kevin Fitzpatrick, and Erik Stockdale, forwarded to Gordon White, marked ‘Attorney Client Privileged’ and ‘Deliberative Document.’ Concerns the Dinsmore project draft 401 certification denial letter and withdrawal letter (AR017924–017926). Luster raises concerns that the
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2000-09-26

    EXH AR023557: Water Resources Consulting to Ecology — Des Moines Creek Flow Augmentation Facility

    A September 26, 2000 letter from Water Resources Consulting L.L.C. to the Washington State Department of Ecology critiques the Port of Seattle's plans to augment water flow in Des Moines Creek, a project related to Sea-Tac Airport operations. The letter identifies several serious flaws in the proposal, including the lack of a secured water source, concerns about water temperature and fluoride toxicity to fish, and a maintenance-intensive design prone to failure. The author concludes that the Port's 'preliminary design' does not provide reasonable assurance that water quality standards will be met.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-04-27

    Exhibit 109: Ecology Letter to Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Re: Port Of Seattle Low Streamflow Analysis Review

    Letter dated April 27, 2000 from Ann E. Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington State Department of Ecology (Northwest Regional Office), to William A. Rozeboom and K. Malcom Leytham of Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, Inc. Responds to their April 11, 2001 letter to Gordon White concerning Ecology’s review of Port Of Seattle’s December 2000 Low Streamflow Analysis.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 08
  • 2000-02-25

    Letter to U.S. Senators Gorton and Murray Regarding Sea-Tac Airport Safety Issues

    In February 2000, the Regional Commission on Airport Affairs (RCAA) wrote to U.S. Senators Patty Murray and Slade Gorton urging an investigation into aviation safety concerns at Sea-Tac Airport, following a KIRO-TV news report that revealed hundreds of unreported near-misses, runway incursions, and mechanical problems documented in NASA AMES files. The RCAA argued that these hidden dangers raised serious questions about the Port of Seattle's plans to expand the airport with a third runway. The letter also requested a moratorium on expansion-related construction permits until a full safety investigation — ideally led by the FAA Inspector General — could be completed.
    CategoriesCorrespondence, Litigation TagsAirport Expansion, airport issues, Aviation Safety Noise Abatement Act 1978, Patty Murray, RCAAFolderRCAA
  • 1999-11-02

    Letter to Arlene Brown regarding aircraft noise concerns in Normandy Park

    In this November 1999 letter, the Port of Seattle's Noise Abatement Program Manager responds to a Normandy Park resident's complaints about low-flying aircraft and late-night jet noise near Sea-Tac Airport. The letter explains that smaller propeller aircraft fly different, lower-altitude flight paths than jets for safety reasons, which brings them over residential neighborhoods like Normandy Park. It also notes that while Sea-Tac restricts older, louder aircraft between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., the Port lacks legal authority to restrict newer aircraft, though it works with airlines to minimize nighttime noise.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsArlene Brown, Noise Abatement Procedures, RCAAFolderRCAA
  • 1999-10-28

    EXH AR026497: Aquatic Research Inc Lab Analysis — Water Samples (PAR025-18)

    A October 1999 laboratory analysis report from Aquatic Research Incorporated details water sample testing conducted for Parametrix/Port of Seattle. One water sample collected on October 8-11, 1999 was tested for total suspended solids, petroleum hydrocarbons (diesel and motor oil), and total metals including cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc. Results showed low levels of contaminants, with zinc detected at 0.102 mg/l and copper at 0.0070 mg/l, while diesel and motor oil levels fell below detection limits.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsACC, Environment, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 1998-06-10

    Letter Karen Keiser to Marc-Stiles Seattle-Times (from Port Of Seattle in violation of Federal Grant Assurance C6 Minnie O. Brasher

    A June 10, 1998 Washington State Legislature letter addressed to Marc Stiles, Reporter at the Seattle Times, detailing the State Auditor's Office confirmation that the Port of Seattle violated Federal Grant Assurance C.6 requirements by failing to secure written declarations of support from surrounding jurisdictions for Sea-Tac Airport noise remedy programs. The letter notes that over $100 million in federal grants had been spent on noise insulation for homes near Sea-Tac, and that Congressman Adam Smith had requested a GAO investigation into the matter.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAdam Smith, Federal Grant Assurance C.6, Karen Keiser, Minnie O Brasher, Port Of Seattle, Port Package Program Updates, Port Packages, Seattle TimesFolderPort Packages

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 … Page 31
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to helping people under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!

Most Recent: Ep #43 Air Quality Monitoring Update (Raw!)

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V