Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

Category : History(243)

Advanced Search Options

  • Tags
  • Dates
  • Media
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc. :: 411 U.S. 624 (1973)

    U.S. Supreme Court City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc., 411 U.S. 624 (1973)City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc. No. 71-1637 Argued February 20, 1973 Decided May 14, 1973 411 U.S. 624 Syllabus Appellees sought an injunction against enforcement of a Burbank city ordinance placing an 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. curfew
    CategoriesHistory TagsCurfew
  • STCP FactSheet No. 5 (Noise Exposure Study)

    ROBIN M. TOWNE AND ASSOCIATESJ INC. (RMTA)J IN ASSOCIATION WITH MANACOUSTICS AND NOISEJ INC. (MAN)J BOTH FIRMS OF SEATTLEJ WASHINGTONJ HAVE BEEN RETAINED BY THE PORT OF SEATTLE AND KING COUNTY TO CONDUCT THE NOISE EXPOSURE PORTION OF THE SEA-TAC COMMUNITIES PLAN. THE PRIMARY DIVISION OF WORK CONSISTSJ IN GENERALJ OF ROBIN M. TOWNE AND
    CategoriesHistory TagsEDC, Man-Acoustics and Noise, Noise, Robin M. Towne Associates, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • STCP FactSheet No. 4 (Property Acquisition)

    CategoriesHistory TagsBuyouts, FactSheet, Relocation Assistance Program, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • STCP FactSheet No. 3 (Technical Advisory Committee) TAC

    CategoriesHistory TagsFactSheet, Sea-Tac Communities Plan, TAC, Technical Advisory Committee
  • 1973-04-15

    ‘Small-loans’ bill approved despite labor opposition

    A April 15, 1973 edition of The Seattle Times covers several local and state stories, including the passage of a controversial 'small-loans' bill in the Washington State Legislature despite strong opposition from organized labor, and a proposed move to create a new Evergreen County by separating suburban areas of King County from Seattle's urban core. The paper also includes local news on topics ranging from a cow-chip throwing contest to an auto club tree-planting initiative, along with retail advertisements typical of the era.
    CategoriesHistory TagsEvergreen County, Paul Barden
  • 1973-03-27

    The Seattle Times, Tuesday, March 27, 1973

    A 1973 Seattle Times editorial argues that King County voters were right to reject a proposed change to the Seattle Port Commission's structure, warning that the port's noise-abatement and management record near Sea-Tac Airport would not improve under the new arrangement. The piece contends that the commission, as currently constituted, is more responsive to constituents and that the proposed restructuring would not adequately address jet-aircraft noise complaints from surrounding communities. Voters are urged to maintain the existing commission structure rather than gamble on an unproven alternative.
    CategoriesHistory TagsEvergreen County, Paul Barden, Seattle Times
  • 1973-03-14

    30% more Saran Wrap for the same old price

    Neighbors of Seattle-Tacoma Airport expressed support for a proposed port setup, with a spokeswoman stating her backing for the Seattle Commission's position opposing House Bill 319, which would have changed how airport-area County Council districts were elected. The Port Commission and King County Council had consulted with the Federal Aviation Administration regarding a $100,000 study to determine how to address airport noise and pollution affecting nearby residents. A Zone Three Committee was formed to represent airport-area residents and push for more responsive local governance on noise-related issues.
    CategoriesHistory TagsEvergreen County, Paul Barden
  • Sea-Tac Communities Plan FactSheet No. 1 (Objectives)

    CategoriesHistory TagsEDC, FactSheet, Land Use, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • Stcp fact sheets 73 splsp sst20220827145145 pdf

    Sea-Tac Communities Plan FactSheet No. 1 (Objectives)

    CategoriesHistory TagsEDC, FactSheet, Land Use, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • Cashmere Valley News Evergreen County 19730301

    SB 2499 sponsored by Gordon Herr. D., Seattle. HB 521 has bipartisan sponsorship. DemocratsInclude Robert Gaines and Frank Warake. both Auburn, and Georgette Vaile, Seattle. Republicans are Paul Barden. Seattle, and John E. Cunningham. Zenith. Evergreen would have an estimated population of 200.606, which would make it a first class county, and another 10,006 would
    CategoriesHistory TagsEvergreen County, King Lysen, Paul Barden, Port Of Seattle Commission, Washington State Legislature

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • KCIA 2026 FOD Walk
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Aug 15, 7:30am - 10:00am
    9404 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108
    Event image 2

    Museum of FlightSeattle, WA Saturday, August 15  •  7:30 AM – 10 AM Overview Join us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk—let’s keep the runway clean and have some fun together! Join Us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk! Get ready to step out and enjoy an awesome in-person event all about keeping our spaces

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to helping people under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!

Most Recent: Ep #38 Aviation Forum Postgame (Raw!)

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Public health and welfare criteria for noise" — , 1973

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V