Category : Correspondence(182)
-
1983-05-18
FAA Response letter regarding North Sea-Tac Park Density Guideline change
Federal Aviation Administration letter to Port of Seattle Director of Planning regarding a requested interim change to density guidelines for the Sunset facility at North Sea-Tac Park, from 60 to 120 people. The FAA does not object to the change but recommends public input and emphasizes compatibility with airport operations. -
Letter to Port of Seattle Commissioners regarding STCP Community Involvement Program
A letter to Port of Seattle Commissioners emphasizing the community’s commitment to maximum compatibility between Sea-Tac Airport and surrounding neighborhoods through the Sea-Tac Communities Plan (STCP) and its Community Involvement Program. The author reminds commissioners of the community’s pact for direct citizen participation in planning processes. -
1982-05-14
Letter to Port of Seattle Regarding Sea-Tac/Boeing Field Airspace Study Public Involvement
Letter from Rosemary Zeutschel criticizing the Port of Seattle’s inadequate public involvement process for the Sea-Tac/Boeing Field Airspace Study, arguing that insufficient time was provided for community organizations to review technical documents and provide meaningful input. -
1982-03-26
Letter from Senator Phil Talmadge regarding FAA density guidelines and Sea-Tac Communities Plan
A letter from Washington State Senator Phil Talmadge to Virginia E. Dana praising her letter to the editor about FAA density guidelines and the Sea-Tac Communities Plan for runway approach. Includes Dana’s original letter discussing clear zone rules, airport safety areas, and community concerns about the North Sea-Tac Park development. -
1981-09-13
Letter to Editor about North Sea-Tac Park Land Use Guidelines
A letter to the editor of Highline Times discussing the Port of Seattle’s acquisition of land north of Sea-Tac Airport for safety purposes and defending FAA density guidelines for the proposed North SeaTac Park. The author argues that the land was purchased to remove residents from an environmentally unacceptable area and should be restricted to