Category : History(230)

Sea-Tac Noise Hotline Calls per Month. 1986-1990 3.6 3,4 3.2 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0,2 JAN 1987 "Scatter TesL" C/1 aC) +Cf)o-DC a)8-03 I111g : FEB MAR APR MAY JUN Q 1988 JUL AUG SEP A 1989 OCT NOV DEC D 1986 + 1987 x 1990 First Quarter. 1990 Percentage of Complaints per Operation 'Hb (1.0%) Arrivals from South South (10.0%)Departures Ground Noise (1.5%) (1.5%)Unusual A/C Event (28.6%) Arrivals from North (0.2%) Combination (57.2%} Departures to North First Quarter, 1990 Comments Received on Sea-Tac Hotline "VibraLion" {0.8%) Low {16.5%) Flying "Too Frequent" (22.2/o) (2.8%) "Off Track" "other" {0.2/o) (57.5%} "Too Loud" Noise Complaint Call Summary by Zip Code First Quarter, 1990 Zip Code Area Beacon Hill/Mt Baker West Bellevue/Medina Mercer Island Madrona Northgate RiverIon Heights Burien/Normandy Park W. Seattle/Alki Point Madison Park/Montlake Bainbridge Island Des Moines North Burien West Federal Way Magnolia East Bellevue Georgetown Queen Anne Hill/Interbay N. Vashon Island University District Central Bellevue lssaquah/Cougar Mountain Highpoint/Delridge West Kent Lake City Federal Way Medina South Bellevue Capitol Hill East Kent Wallingford Sunnydale Seward Park/Mt Baker White Center/Delridge McMicken Hts/S. Center East Redmond Bellevue/Crossroads West Auburn W. Seattle/Fauntleroy Shilshole Bay/N. Ballard S. Vashon Island/Burton ZiP Code 98144 98004 98040 98122 981 15 98168 98166 98116 98112 98110 98198 98146 98023 98199 98008 98108 98119 98070 98105 98005 98027 98126 98032 98125 98003 98039 98006 98102 98042 98103 98148 98118 98106 98188 98053 98007 98001 98136 981 17 98013 Total Individual Calk Cab 377…

Enhance Noise Remedy “Cost Share’' Program Area Mobile Homes Hardship Committee Priority Listing Transaction Assistance Public Buildings 111: A B. C D E. F. G H. J Section IV: Improve Duwamish Industrial/Elliott Bay Corridor Noise Abatement Procedures Duwamish/Elliott Bay Corridor Procedures Microwave Landing System A B. Section V: Nighttime Flight Corridors Section VI: Control of Ground Noise Section VII: Noise Management System Tier 1 : Expand Existing Flight Track Monitoring System Tier 2: Develop New Comprehensive Noise Management System Tier 3: Integrate Noise and Flight Track Monitoring Section VIII: Flight Track Management Statement Regarding Flight Tracks Section IX: Section X: Control Noise From Most Annoying Operations Initiate Noise Abatement Committee Section XI: Changes in Present Conditions Section XII: Process Appendix C: Sea-Tac Noise Abatement Committee Page 3 Page 4 Page Page Page Page Page Page Page Page Page Page 7 Page 8 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page Page Page Page Page 14 Page 14 Page 15 Page 15 Page 16 Page 16 Page 17 1- According to the technical consultant , this agreement represents the most comprehensive noise control program of any major international ahport in the country. Full implementation of all these agreements could result in an overall noise reduction of approximately 50% in terms of the Ldn noise levels in the communities surrounding the airport. NOTES : Italics indicate changes to the Draft Package resulting from the Mediation Commit- tee meeting on 3131190 . SYmbol "R" on pages eight and nine indicate that some language was…

The purpose of this report is to summarize the steps that have been taken in updating the program area boundaries for the Noise Remedy Program. This report also specifies the staff boundary recommendation which has been developed in light of all advise and information available. Noise Remedy Update The Sea-Tac Communities Plan was adopted in 1975/76 by the Port of Seattle and King County. This plan recommended program area boundaries based on the techni- cal noise information available at that time. Since that time new noise impact technology has been developed and the noise environment around Sea-Tac has changed • Due to these changes, the current update of the Noise Remedy Plan entails a review and adjustment of the boundaries for the three program areas: 1. Acquisition 2. Neighborhood reinforcement (purchase assurance) 3. Cost-sharing insulation The review and adjustment of boundaries has generally taken place in three unscheduled phases. First, the consultant (Peat Marwick & Mitchell/PMM) hired to assist Port staff with the update made an initial boundary recommendation based on noise criteria and a set application of that criteria. Subsequently, a group of citizens (a subcommittee to the Technical Working Committee) reviewed the boundaries suggested by PMM and recommended several changes based on cri- teria other than strictly noise criteria. The third phase of review is that of the staff working with the consultant and FAA staff. Taking the PMM & sub- committee's advise, the staff in turn prepared a boundary recommendation that is primarily based on noise and…

high line public schools 5}J 1'. 0. lOX 66100 51ATTLI, WASHINGTON DATI May 9, 1984 A~ION REQUIRED ASBESTOS--SUNSET JR. HIGH U INfORMATIONAL have researched our asbestos program files seeking references to the former Sunset Jr. High. The following are the only references found. January 27, 1977 -Memo- Blaine Larsen to Dave Zeigler "Sumnary of Locations With Asbestos Ceilings" 8. Sunset Jr. High A. All Classroom Areas B. Shop Building--all areas (Note: The title would more accurately read "Surrmary of Locations With Friable ) Ceilings" because the district had not begun to sarrple or test for asbestos content. January 5, 1979 - Memo - Blaine Larsen This memo indicates that all sites with friable materials are being tested except Mt. Rainier and Sunset. August 8, 1979 - Seattle Times article quoting Bob Sealey to the effect that Sunset will be checked. The record indicates an early identification that there was friable material on the ceiling at Sunset. It is also apparent that no samples were taken or tested for asbestos content. The following chronology for the closure and disposition of Sunset may explain the circumstances. June 1973 July 1975 Fall 1976 January 1977 December 1977 January 1979 District files airport noise impact suit against Port of Seattle. - Sunset closed as a school. - Voluntary asbestos inspections begun. - Memo listing locations with friable material (Sunset included) - Settlement of noise suit. As a condition of the settlement the Port off Seattle acquired the Sunset site. Title was transferred upon receipt…

Airport Noise Remedy· Update--Henr~ M. Jackson International Airport Community Attitude Surveys The Community Attitude Survey has · been completed. It consisted of three separate surveys: a self-administered survey of August Neighborhood Workshop attendees and two telephone surveys. The complete results are presented in a final report which was prepared by McClure Research Company. A summary of the survey results was distributed to all those on the Update's mailing list which includes all members of the Technical Working Committee. For those who requested a final report at the October 26, 1983 Technical Workings Committee meeting, a copy is enclosed. If other Committee members would like a copy of the report, please call me at 382-3327 to make arrangements for mailing. These results will be used in the update of the Airport's Noise Remedy Program in a number of ways which will include but not be limited to the following: *Evaluate the application of specific noise remedies in specific neighborhoods. *Increase the reliability of recommending a noise remedy program which is generally accepted by the community. *Improve the effectiveness of our community involvement program. *Reflect community attitudes in the development of the Noise Remedy Program. 2696p Attachment Distribution: Technical Working Committee: Berwald, Black, Bohrer, Bray, Carver, Conradi, Dana, Dinwiddie, Dodds, Hall, Hamilton, Holstine, Hroner, Jhaveri, Johnson, Kos, Kumasaka, D. Legg, R. Legg, Nelson, Peart, Petterson, D. Robertson, Rus, Russell, Secrist, Shride, Simpson, Strander, Tranum, Vinton, Wing, Zalud. King County: Miller, R. Robertson, Tarantino Federal Aviation Administration: Coppinger, Saito Peat Marwick: Maddison, Bowlin…