TagLand Use(62)

· "There is a vital need for· ne , ai~rts to relieve ex- isting ones at or near ·criti· cal capacity, for example in northeast .(Bos- . ton•Washington; D. C.). · "Yet .only two major hub airports ·are being built - Kansas City and Dallas- Fort Worth .. . to put it more bluntly,. the American air-transportation system is in a crunch," Greenfield· said. He said the environmental impact of the aircraft indus- try, in the. opinion of -the public, centers on airports and not airplanes. An airpvrt has a primary environmental impact from noise pollution and ai r and water pollution, includ- ing waste oils, coming di· rectly from the airport. The secondary impact involves the pollution j:!enerate<f by industrial traffic and resi- dential areas attracted to , the vicinity ·of ·an airport. · The secondary effect of an airport can "produce large local impacts,'~ Greenfield said. The use of buffer zones requires land around the airport and it can be used in a number of ways, whi.ch cause pollution and traffic. "T he · implications for very large airports are great," he said. "Satellite industries attracted to San Francisco International Air- port, for instance, account for 90,000 jobs and 130 zoned industrial parks are locating within 3() miles of the new Dallas-Fort Worth airport. "It is obvious that plan- ning for only the primary impact of an airport will in- volve us in a vicious pollu- tion cycle, expensive and possibly insoluble as activi- ty grows unplanned around…

A RESOLUTION o€ t h e Port Uowniesion of t h e Por t of Seat t le p r o v i d i n g f o r t h e amendment of Uni t 18 of t h e e x i s t i n g Comprehensive Scheme of Harbor Improvements of t h e P o r t of Seat t le a p p l i c a b l e t o Sea-Tac I n t e r n a t i o n a l A i r p o r t , and p r o v i d i n g f o r t h e a c q u i s i t i o n of a d d i t i o n a l fands and o t h e r p r o p e r t i e s n e c e s s a r y ar,d r e l a t e d t o t h e o p e r a t i o n of Sea-Tas I n t e r n a t i o n a l Airport. WilEKEAS, t h e v o t e r s of King County, pursuan t t o the p r o v i s i o n s of e n a b l i n g l e g i s l a t i o…

UN APP D. G-2032 DECRIToR DESIGN ENGNEER1 SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RE SOLUTION NO. 2516 AMENDING UNIT NO. 18 OF THE PORT OF SEATTLE cONSULTANT NO. OATE DESOR DRAWN BY CHECKED BY: PORT OF SEATTLE NO cOMPREHENSIVE SCHEME APPROVED STIA-7318-C-| , 2TH AMOINES ATT1.E TCOM A INTE RNATIONAL A1RPORT t A 16TH SUNSET PARK 20TH o. bpbnlotooaOa ND AE TO isEAT2d9 SUNSCT URT TH 400 , 1 T AVE GRAPHIC SCALE PARCEL 30 LEGEND EXISTING PORT OF SEATTLE PROPERTY PROPOSED PROPERTY To BE ACQUIRE D UNDER PARCEL 30 EXHIBIT "B" PROPOSEO PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED UNDER PARCEL 31. TTO0o PORT OF SEATTLE REVIS'oNS APP O NO OATt BY DEACRPTION APP O SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2O3 RESOLUTiON NO. 2516 AMENDING UNIT NO 18 DEsiGN EE co32 DEBOE D,K ALE DATE cONGULTAMT NO OF THE PORT OF SEATTLE DAYIN AHOVEO COMPREHENSIVE SCHEME roR O sATTLL Ho STIA 7318-C-I ORDS SE A T T IL E T A C M A IN T E R N A T N A L A IR PO R T * * cO M S S iiui SEATTLE -TACOM A N TEA N A TIO N A L AIR PORT EGOAOEo GN SEA TTLE TACOM A INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT S N * * * * . A r OES MOINESAY 2THAVE MOINES NFJ F ; SE.ATT I.E TA POF L ***% T AVE **** ** NORTH LEGEND RE V ISio NS APP D. NO. OATE DYY DESIGN ENGINELR NO DATE OY DESCRIPTION DESIGNER ORAWNE sCALE L e e T…

t -a ' fI An IB++q ' OK + ;3+G' 4 B El @ I a lah aRe GOLD- A .a 00 a A -1 +'+n + db A,a a aI da k-( k.I L.2- + + r ;ifI k..,.g L MInh ) ; ++++ seN

2020 REAL ESTATE STRATEGIC PLAN | August 2021 Introduction ..........................................................1 Market Context ....................................................2 Real Estate Principles .........................................7 Property Profiles and Strategies ...................17 Fishermen’s Terminal .................................. 18 Salmon Bay Marina ..................................... 21 Terminal 91, Pier 90 & Pier 91 .................... 23 Terminal 91- Uplands ................................. 24 Pier 90 & Pier 91 ............................................ 27 Harbor Marine Corporate Center ............. 29 Pier 69 ............................................................. 31 World Trade Center West ............................ 33 Portfolio Growth - Implementation ............35 APPENDIX .............................................................45 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Port Commissioners Port Leadership Port Real Estate Team Advisory Committee Members Introduction 2020 REAL ESTATE STRATEGIC PLAN | August 2021 PROJECT BACKGROUND & PURPOSE Heartland has been tasked with developing a Real Estate Strategic Plan (RESP) for the Port of Seattle (POS) with a focus on select properties from the Port’s portfolio of industrial and office assets. The analysis and strategy serve an update to the 2016 POS Real Estate Strategic Plan, which resulted in a series of property specific recommendations that the Port has been leveraging since that time. The updated RESP is designed to provide the POS with a strategy to effectively evaluate and manage its existing portfolio of real estate assets while also providing a framework for evaluating future real estate investments and acquisitions. APPROACH & METHODOLOGY Underwriting of and Evaluation of Assets Heartland initiated the effort with a thorough review of Port selected assets within the portfolio. This included development of comprehensive tenant and occupancy profiles and development of a portfolio level model to evaluate future lease turnover and overall…