TagLitigation(19)
-
2023-08-14 23:10Young environmental activists prevail in first-of-its-kind climate change trial in Montana
By MATTHEW BROWN and AMY BETH HANSON The Associated Press HELENA, Mont. (AP) — Young environmental activists scored what experts described as a ground-breaking legal victory Monday when a Montana judge said state agencies were violating their constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment by allowing fossil fuel development. The ruling in this first-of-its- -
2023-06-20 22:58A greenwashing lawsuit against Delta aims to set a precedent
By KENDRA PIERRE-LOUIS Bloomberg As tranquil instrumental music plays over gauzy images of nature, a woman’s voice-over begins. “Isn’t it a paradox,” she wonders aloud, “that the love for this world that gets us out in it, sometimes leaves behind the things that can harm it? Flight by flight, we broaden our views. We gain -
2023-06-15 11:30Carbon Neutrality Suit Against Delta Airlines Signals the Arrival Time of “Greenwashing” Litigation
A recent class action filed against Delta Airlines is among the first major consumer cases targeting claims of carbon neutrality. The complaint, filed in Mayanna Berrin v. Delta Airlines Inc., No. 2:23-cv-04150 (C.D. Cal.) on May 30, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, takes aim at Delta Airlines’ -
2023-05-30 00:00Berrin v Delta United States District Central District Of California Class Action Complaint
L. David Russell (Cal. Bar No. 260043) david@russelllawpc.com 1500 Rosecrans Ave, Suite 500 Manhattan Beach, California 90266 Telephone: (323) 638-7551 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class -
2023-04-24 15:11Edmiston v. Port of Seattle – Order Setting Civil Case Schedule, September 29, 2022
ASSIGNED JUDGE: Sandra E Widlan, Dept. 53 FILED DATE: 09/29/2022 Defendant(s) TRIAL DATE:10/02/2023 A civil case has been filed in the King County Superior Court and will be managed by the Case Schedule on Page 3 as ordered by the King County Superior Court Presiding Judge. I. NOTICES NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Plaintiff may serve a copy of this Order Setting Case Schedule (Schedule) on the Defendant(s) along with the Summons and Complaint/Petition. Otherwise, the Plaintiff shall serve the Schedule on the Defendant(s) within 10 days after the later of: (1) the filing of the Summons and Complaint/Petition or (2) service of the Defendant's first response to the Complaint/Petition, whether that response is a Notice of Appearance, a response, or a Civil Rule 12 (CR 12) motion. The Schedule may be served by regular mail, with proof of mailing to be filed promptly in the form required by Civil Rule 5 (CR 5). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: All attorneys and parties should make themselves familiar with the King County Local Rules [KCLCR] -- especially those referred to in this Schedule. In order to comply with the Schedule, it will be necessary for attorneys and parties to pursue their cases vigorously from the day the case is filed. For example, discovery must be undertaken promptly in order to comply with the deadlines for joining additional parties, claims, and defenses, for disclosing possible witnesses [See KCLCR 26], and for meeting the discovery cutoff date [See KCLCR 37(g)]. You are required to give… -
2014-10-27 23:57
Admasu v. Port of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington,Division 1. Kebede ADMASU, et al., Appellants, v. PORT OF SEATTLE, a Washington municipal corporation, Respondent. No. 70220–3–I. Decided: October 27, 2014 Darrell L. Cochran, Kevin Michael Hastings Pfau Cochran VertetisAmala PLLC, Tacoma, WA, Jason Paul Amala, Pfau Cochran Vertetis Amala PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner. Timothy J. Filer, Patrick J. -
2011-11-10 00:00Pfau Cochran third runway lawsuit.com post card 11/10/2011
Rep y * 0 LAY R* T A OVEMBER 10,2011 You may know that a class action lawsuit has been filed to recover real property value damages that the Port of Seattle's Third Runway operations have caused. But over two years has passed since that lawsuit was first filed because the Port is still fighting to prevent the class action from going forward. As of today, the · on class certification until November 18, 2011. Even if the Court certifies that class action, it is to the value of your real property (e.g., the Third Runway has reduced the value of your real property). The class action lawsuit will *not* cover other damages, like personal injury, annoyance, or damage to property other than real property. If the Third Runway caused you to suffer any damages other than reducing the value of your real prQJilert~', su !:J. as personal injury or annoyance, Washington law *REQUIRES* you to file a lawsuit within three wlwB ~..ou first suffere hose damages. For most property owners, this will be three years from tlw date I bird Runway started operations. Our law firm, Pfm 'lLhran Vertet''L· mala PLLC, fill'd t• .......... ,.,.., people who are stung the Port of Seattle for other Cl. m Third Runway has caused you to suffer personal injur a noyance, or damages other than damage to the value of your real property, and if you want to protect your claim, please contact us NO LATER than November 10, 2011, by calling… -
2003-11-18 16:37
Washington State Supreme Court Oral Arguments Port of Seattle v PCHB
Transcript Origination Notice: Transcriptions are machine-generated and may not have been proofread or corrected. Transcriptions are reference, search and assistive in nature only and are NOT an official transcript of this video 00:00:00.530 — Next on t.v. debut the Washington State Supreme Court listens to oral arguments in the case of Port of Seattle -
1981-12-10 00:00Boeing Headquarters Memo of Understanding – Port of Seattle Letter
Letter from Port of Seattle Director of Aviation Oris Dunham to King County Council Chairman Paul Barden regarding a Memo of Understanding for Boeing Headquarters project at Sea-Tac International Airport. Includes discussion of rezoning approval following favorable Washington State Supreme Court ruling.