Category : History(243)
-
1981-12-10
Boeing Headquarters Memo of Understanding – Port of Seattle Letter
★ 32Letter from Port of Seattle Director of Aviation Oris Dunham to King County Council Chairman Paul Barden regarding a Memo of Understanding for Boeing Headquarters project at Sea-Tac International Airport. Includes discussion of rezoning approval following favorable Washington State Supreme Court ruling. -
1981-10-16
Zone III Committee Response to Airspace Study Advisory Committee Invitation
★Letter from Jean Pihlman, Coordinator of Zone III Committee, accepting invitation to participate in the Port of Seattle’s Airspace Study Advisory Committee. The committee designates Jean Pihlman as representative and Virginia Dana as alternate, offering cooperation for the study completion. -
224-78-R Motion King County Council (Boeing HQ Rezone)
★ 32Proposal to move Boeing headquarters to west side of airport noise buffer property from Sea-Tac Communities Plan -
1980-11-19
Regional Airport System Plan, 1980-2000, Central Puget Sound region
★ 32This 1980 draft report, produced by the Puget Sound Council of Governments, outlines a Regional Airport System Plan for the Central Puget Sound area covering the years 1980 to 2000. Funded by the Port of Seattle, the Washington State Department of Transportation, and the Federal Aviation Administration, the plan was developed to guide regional aviation policy and infrastructure decisions across King, Pierce, Snohomish, and Kitsap counties. It was prepared for review by the Standing Committee on Transportation and represents an early framework for managing air travel demand and airport development in the greater Seattle region. -
1980-10-22
Letter from Oris Dunham Airport Open Use (AOU) Classification Status Update
★Letter from Port of Seattle Policy Advisory Committee Chairman Oris Dunham to Virginia Dana providing status update on the Airport Open Use (AOU) classification in King County Zoning Ordinance. The letter explains the AOU classification’s purpose for economic development near airports and community concerns that led to a recommendation for deletion from the Highline Area -
1979-01-25
Letter from State Representative John Jovanovich to Jean Pihlman regarding STCP Policy Advisory Committee
★In this January 25, 1979 letter, Washington State Representative John Jovanovich (31st District) writes to Ms. Jean Pihlman explaining that the Sea-Tac Comprehensive Plan (STCP), adopted by the Port of Seattle and King County, primarily addresses the airport and its noise-impacted areas. He urges that citizen representatives on the Policy Advisory Committee — the body responsible for monitoring the plan — should come directly from the noise-impacted communities, so that their needs are properly understood by decision-makers. -
1976-06-08
Resolution No. 2626: A resolution establishing planning and developmental policies relating to Sea-Tac International Airport and its vicinity
★Resolution No. 2626, adopted by the Port of Seattle Commission on June 8, 1976, formally accepted the Sea-Tac/Communities Plan as a guide for developing Sea-Tac International Airport in a way that maximizes compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods. The resolution directed Port staff to pursue federal funding for land acquisition in flight path zones, establish an aircraft noise monitoring system, and launch a pilot acoustic insulation program for nearby homes. Total noise abatement efforts were estimated to cost approximately $50 million over a ten-year period, with funding expected from airport revenues and federal assistance. -
1973-07-01
Technical Report #2 Public Facilities and Services in the Sea-Tac Communities Plan Study Area
★This 1973 technical report from King County's Office of Community and Environmental Development surveys the public facilities and services available in the SeaTac Communities Plan Study Area. It covers schools, parks, libraries, fire protection, sewer and water services, and other community infrastructure. The report was produced to support land use planning in the area surrounding Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. -
City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal
★ 32In one of the most maddening examples of airport law, the United States argued for reversal (ie. allowing for local airport control) of curfews. The FAA, which had previously supported the ban, adopted a neutral position when the The Department of Transportation, filed a Friend of the Court brief arguing for reversal. Summary Holding that