Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagWater Quality(478)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1994-06-30

    EXH AR026741: NPDES Permit No. WA-002465-I STIA Response to Comments

    This 1994 document is a Response to Comments on a proposed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) wastewater discharge permit issued to the Port of Seattle for Sea-Tac International Airport. It summarizes public feedback gathered at meetings in Des Moines and Normandy Park, Washington, addressing topics such as storm water management, effluent limitations, spill plans, and pollution prevention at the airport. The document reflects the Department of Ecology's review of industrial wastewater, cooling water, and storm water discharges from airport operations including aircraft maintenance, fueling, and de-icing activities.
    TagsACC, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 1994-06-30

    EXH AR028290: NPDES Permit No. WA-002465-1 Issuance Letter and Permit — Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac International Airport

    Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) letter dated June 30, 1994, issuing NPDES Permit No. WA-002465-1 to Port Of Seattle – Sea-Tac International Airport, expiring June 30, 1999. Signed by John H. Glynn, Water Quality Supervisor, Northwest Regional Office. Permit authorizes discharge of industrial wastewater, non-contact cooling water, and storm water to Puget Sound, Des
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 1994-05-18

    1994 Puget Sound water quality management plan

    The 1994 Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan is a regional environmental policy document adopted on May 18, 1994 by the Puget Sound Water Quality Authority, based in Olympia, Washington. It outlines strategies and guidelines for managing and protecting water quality across the Puget Sound region. Note: This document pertains to water quality management and does not contain content related to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    TagsEnvironment, King County, Puget Sound, State of Washington, Water Quality
  • 1994-03-30

    Exhibit 721: Record of Communication — Outgoing Call to Kevin Fitzpatrick, Ecology, Regarding WER Work Plan and Mixing Zone Study

    Parametrix Record of Communication (AR 026481–026483), project no. 55-2912-01, dated 3/30/94, by Linda Logan, documenting outgoing call to Kevin Fitzpatrick at Ecology (Ecolog[y]) as follow-up to 3/25/99 meeting. Topics include WER (Waste Effluent Ratio) work plan outline review by Gary Bailey and Randy Marshall, mixing zone study approach review by Norm Glen, AKART requirements at
    TagsACC, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 1993-12-22

    Port Of Seattle Letter to Barbara Stuhring: Ethylene Glycol Deicing at Sea-Tac Airport and Wastewater Treatment

    A 1993 letter from the Port of Seattle to a Des Moines resident explains that airline deicing at Sea-Tac Airport uses only FAA-approved ethylene or propylene glycol, and that wastewater from deicing drains to the airport's treatment system before being discharged to Puget Sound — not to Miller or Des Moines Creeks. The Port acknowledged its treatment plant was not designed to handle glycols and was evaluating upgrades. A follow-up 1996 letter challenges a contradictory statement in the airport's Final Environmental Impact Statement, which claimed most deicing fluids were contained and treated by the Port's Industrial Wastewater System.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsDeicing, Des Moines Creek, EIS, Environmental Impact Statement, Ethylene Gycol, FAA, letter, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 1993-12-22

    Port Of Seattle letter to Barbara H. Stuhring regarding ethylene glycol use at Sea-Tac Airfield

    A 1993 Port of Seattle letter to Des Moines resident Barbara Stuhring explains that airplane deicing at Sea-Tac uses only FAA-approved ethylene or propylene glycol, and that wastewater from deicing drains to the airport's treatment system before being discharged to Puget Sound — not to Miller or Des Moines Creeks. A 1996 Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) later addressed public concerns about deicing fluid effects on local waterways, concluding that glycol quantities in stormwater runoff were too small and too diluted to cause lethal impacts on aquatic life in those creeks. Stuhring subsequently wrote to the Port challenging what she saw as a contradictory response in the Final EIS compared to the original 1993 letter.
    CategoriesHistory TagsBarbara Hinkle, Deicing, Ethylene Gycol, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • Port of seattle 1993 12 22 letter stuhring ethylene glycol deicing wastewater pdf
    1993-12-22

    Port Of Seattle Letter to Barbara Stuhring: Ethylene Glycol Deicing at Sea-Tac Airport and Wastewater Treatment

    December 22, 1993 letter from Port of Seattle to Barbara H. Stuhring of Des Moines, WA responding to her November 17 inquiry about ethylene glycol and propylene glycol deicing fluid use at Sea-Tac Airport. Letter states FAA requires only ethylene or propylene glycol for aircraft deicing, that deicing areas drain to the airfield wastewater treatment
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsDeicing, Des Moines Creek, EIS, Environmental Impact Statement, Ethylene Gycol, FAA, letter, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 1993-01-01

    Stormwater erosion and sediment control for large parcel construction

    This Washington State Department of Ecology report outlines stormwater erosion and sediment control requirements for large construction projects involving one or more acres of disturbed land in the Puget Sound Basin. It describes best management practices (BMPs) such as covering exposed soil, trapping sediment onsite, and protecting adjacent properties from runoff and sediment. Developers are required to create an erosion and sediment control plan and are financially responsible for its implementation.
    TagsConstruction, Ecology, NPDES, RCAA, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 1992-12-26

    EXH AR017093: Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington — WAC Chapter 173-201A

    Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Chapter 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology under RCW 90.48. Covers introduction (WAC 173-201A-010) and definitions (WAC 173-201A-020) including AKART, background conditions, best management practices, carcinogen, chronic/acute conditions, critical condition (7Q10 flow), ecoregions, fecal coliform, hardness, mixing
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, RCW, WAC, Washington Administrative Code, Water Quality
  • 1992-02-01

    Des Moines Creek water quality study

    A 1992 water quality study of Des Moines Creek, prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for the FAA and Port of Seattle, assessed the health of the creek during storm runoff events. The creek, which originates near Sea-Tac International Airport and flows to Puget Sound, had its aquatic ecosystem severely damaged by jet fuel spills in 1985 and 1986. The study sampled seven locations along the creek and three tributaries to identify water quality problems and determine whether stormwater pollution from airport operations was causing toxic conditions.
    TagsDes Moines Creek, FAA, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Washington aviation system plan executive summary" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V