Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1084)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1996-12-18

    EXH AR040435: Port Of Seattle Section 404 Application Letter — Third Runway Master Plan Update

    Letter dated December 18, 1996 from Barbara Hinkle, Senior Environmental Specialist, Port Of Seattle, to Jack Kennedy, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Office, submitting a Section 404 Application to place fill material into waters of the United States at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport associated with the Master Plan Update. Covers background on the Puget
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan, Third RunwayFolderBox 17
  • 1996-12-18

    Section 404 Permit Application: Port Of Seattle to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway Fill Material

    In December 1996, the Port of Seattle submitted a Section 404 permit application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to place fill material in waters of the United States as part of Sea-Tac Airport's Master Plan Update, which included construction of a third parallel runway. The application explains that the new runway, located 2,500 feet west of the existing 16R/34L runway, was needed to reduce severe arrival delays during poor weather conditions, which were costing airlines approximately $42 million annually. The project was the outcome of nearly a decade of regional planning, including the PSRC's Flight Plan Study, which evaluated numerous alternatives before recommending the runway expansion as the best solution for the region's long-term air travel needs.
    TagsArmy Corp of Engineers, Barbara Hinkle, Permitting, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderThird Runway
  • 1996-12-18

    Exhibit 208: Port Of Seattle Section 404 Application Letter — Third Runway Master Plan Update Wetland Fill, Sea-Tac Airport

    In December 1996, the Port of Seattle submitted a Section 404 permit application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to place fill material into wetlands at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport as part of its Master Plan Update, which included construction of a third parallel runway. The proposed runway, located 2,500 feet west of the existing runways, was intended to address severe arrival delays during poor weather conditions, which reduced airport capacity from 60 to as few as 24 arrivals per hour roughly 44% of the year. The application was the result of nearly a decade of regional planning, environmental review, and public involvement, including studies confirming that no feasible supplemental airport sites existed in the four-county region.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Barbara Hinkle, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 1996-12-04

    Neighborhood impact matrices

    This document outlines a Neighborhood Impact Matrices framework used to assess environmental, transportation, and socio-economic effects of a proposed airport-related project on communities surrounding Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, including cities such as Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, and Tukwila. Each matrix evaluates impacts across four columns — Measure, Impact, Mitigation, and Cost — covering issues such as aircraft noise (DNL and SEL contours), air quality, surface and groundwater quality, wetlands, and floodplains. Proposed mitigations range from neighborhood buyouts at $760,000 per acre for areas within the 65 DNL contour to easement and insulation programs, stormwater management plans, and flight track modifications.
    TagsEconomic Impacts, education, Raytheon, Third Runway, Thomas/LaneFolderStudies
  • 1996-12-01

    EXH AR040251: JARPA Application for Proposed Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    JARPA (Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application) and Section 404 application submitted by Port Of Seattle to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Jack Kennedy, Seattle District Office) in December 1996, prepared by Parametrix, Inc. Requests authorization to place fill material into waters of the United States at Sea-Tac Airport associated with the Master Plan Update
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Environmental Impact Statement, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 17
  • 1996-12-01

    Sea-Tac Master Plan Update 1996: Wetland Impact/Mitigation Sites — Vicinity Map, Wetlands Affected, and Classification/Size/Impact Tables

    This 1996 document outlines the Port of Seattle's wetland impact and mitigation plan associated with the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update. It includes vicinity maps showing the airport's location in King County, Washington, and identifies numerous wetland sites affected by planned airport improvements. Detailed tables classify each impacted wetland by type—forested, shrub-scrub, or emergent—and quantify the acreage disturbed across sections of Townships 22N and 23N, Range 4E.
    TagsAuburn Wetland, Miller Creek, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Master Plan Update 1996, Third RunwayFolderThird Runway
  • 1996-12-01

    Miller Creek Relocation Plan for Proposed Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    This 1996 plan by Parametrix, Inc. outlines the proposed relocation of Miller Creek to accommodate expansion improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. It assesses the creek's existing ecological conditions—including fish habitat, hydrology, and riparian vegetation—and identifies the construction impacts the relocation would cause. The document then presents mitigation goals, site selection rationale, and engineering details for redesigning the creek channel to offset environmental impacts.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Landrum & Brown, Miller Creek, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderThird Runway
  • 1996-11-25

    Letter from A. Brown to City of Burien: Comments on South King County Impact Assistance and Mitigation Studies Team Draft

    A Normandy Park resident and aerospace engineering manager submitted detailed comments in November 1996 criticizing a draft impact study related to Sea-Tac Airport's proposed Third Runway, arguing that the analysis underestimated real estate value losses, air pollution risks, and traffic disruptions caused by the project. The letter contends that home values in Normandy Park stagnated or declined after the Third Runway was publicly announced, and that any valid property value assessment must use baseline figures from before negative publicity began. The author also challenges the study's air quality modeling assumptions and traffic analysis, warning that the Port of Seattle would selectively cite favorable findings while ignoring methodological flaws.
    TagsArlene Brown, CASE, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, City of Burien, City of Normandy Park, Environmental Impact Statement, Frederick Stouder, HOK, Normandy Park, Property Values, Third RunwayFolderCASE
  • 1996-11-01

    EXH AR039950: Fill Material Alternative Delivery Method Study for Third Runway, Phase I — Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    HNTB-prepared Final Draft Phase I study (November 1996) for Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway fill material alternative delivery methods. Evaluates transport corridors including Corridor 1 (Des Moines Creek barge transfer and land conveyor), Corridor 2 (SR 509 conveyor, truck, rail), and Corridor 3 (SR 518 conveyor, truck, rail). Covers technical viability, construction/environmental permitting (local, state, federal),
    TagsACC, Conveyor, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, SR509, Third RunwayFolderBox 17
  • 1996-10-21

    City of Burien Memorandum: South King County Airport Impact Assistance and Mitigation Studies

    A 1996 City of Burien memorandum outlines preliminary findings from a regional study on the socio-economic and environmental impacts of Sea-Tac Airport's proposed expansion and third runway. Estimated mitigation costs for five South King County cities totaled $3.05 billion over twenty years, with Burien alone facing roughly $800 million in costs and over $190 million in single-family property value losses by 2020. The study argues that because the airport's benefits are spread across the broader Puget Sound region while its costs—including noise, traffic, and a reduced tax base—fall disproportionately on a handful of nearby communities, targeted mitigation funding is both an equity issue and a necessity.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsCity of Burien, Frederick Stouder, Property Values, Socioeconomic Impacts, South King County, Third RunwayFolderMitigation Study

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 … Page 109
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V