TagThird Runway(1092)
-
1997-09-26
Costly War Waged Over Third Runway
David Schaefer Seattle Times Staff Reporter AS PREPARATIONS begin for building a new runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, a coalition of cities is spending millions of tax dollars on lawsuits and public relations trying to stop the massive project. The Port of Seattle, meanwhile, will spend millions in public funds to keep it from being -
1997-08-31
EXH AR025041: Aerial Photographs STIA 1997–1998 — Walker & Associates
This document contains aerial photographs of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) taken in 1997 and 1998 by Walker & Associates, a photogrammetric and GIS services firm based in Seattle, WA. The images show the airport's runways, taxiways, terminal area, and surrounding residential and commercial neighborhoods from above. Accompanying metadata indicates the 1997 photograph was taken on August 31, 1997, at an approximate print scale of 1 inch equals 2,300 feet, under negative number 1197 SeaTac PP-2. -
1997-07-03
EXH AR041146: FAA Record of Decision for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update Development Actions
FAA Northwest Mountain Region Record of Decision (ROD) dated July 3, 1997, providing final Federal Aviation Administration approval for Sea-Tac International Airport Master Plan Update development actions adopted by Port of Seattle (POS) Commission Resolution #3212 (August 1, 1996) and amended by Resolution No. 3245 (May 27, 1997). Approves a new 8500-foot dependent air carrier -
1997-07-03
Record of decision for the Master Plan Update development actions, Sea-Tac International Airport, Seattle, Washington
This 1997 Federal Aviation Administration Record of Decision granted final approval for major development actions at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, including construction of a new 8,500-foot third parallel runway, a 600-foot extension of an existing runway, and various landside facility improvements planned through 2010. The decision followed years of environmental review, public comment, and regional planning studies aimed at addressing growing passenger demand and significant air traffic delays, particularly during poor weather conditions. -
1997-06-30
EXH AR041143: Letter from Governor Gary Locke to Secretary Rodney Slater Re: State Certification for Sea-Tac Third Runway Air and Water Quality Compliance
June 30, 1997 letter from Washington Governor Gary Locke to U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Rodney Slater, reaffirming and superseding the December 20, 1996 letter from Ecology Director Mary Riveland to Dennis Ossenkop. Constitutes state certification required under 49 U.S.C. 47101 et seq. that the Sea-Tac Airport third runway development project will comply with applicable -
1997-06-30
Exhibit 2091: Governor Gary Locke Letter to Secretary Rodney Slater Re: Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway Air and Water Quality Assurance
June 30, 1997 letter from Washington Governor Gary Locke to U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Rodney Slater reaffirming state certification under 49 U.S.C. 47101 for the Sea-Tac Airport third runway development project. Supersedes December 20, 1996 letter from Ecology Director Mary Riveland to Dennis Ossenkop. Port of Seattle required to: obtain air and water quality -
1997-06-08
No Impact on Ground Water? Comments on DOE and Port Of Seattle Agreement for Ground Water Study at Sea-Tac Airport
A 1997 public comment letter from a Seattle resident raises concerns that a planned ground water study near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport is too limited in scope to accurately assess pollution risks to local drinking water. The author documents an airport outfall discharging oil, grease, and glycols just south of a drinking water well head, and argues the study must be expanded to include outfalls, fuel depot leaks, abandoned underground tanks, and the effects of massive planned construction. The letter urges regulators to require more rigorous sampling conditions and to openly address the water quality impacts of the airport's proposed Third Runway expansion. -
1997-05-28
EXH AR041132: Port Of Seattle Commission Resolution No. 3245 — Reaffirming Master Plan Update and Authorizing Third Runway Construction at STIA
Port Of Seattle Commission Resolution No. 3245 reaffirms adoption of the Airport Master Plan Update for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA), authorizes construction of a new dependent air carrier runway (third runway) located 2500 feet west of existing runway 16L/34R, expansion of the existing parking garage, and a new north employee parking lot. References PSRC Resolution -
1997-05-13
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Master Plan Update Development Actions at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Volume 1: Main Text and Appendices A through C-1
This 1997 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) examines the environmental effects of proposed expansion plans at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, including construction of a new third parallel runway, terminal improvements, and parking upgrades. The study was prompted by faster-than-expected growth in air travel demand during the mid-1990s, which exceeded earlier forecasts and required updated analysis of noise, air quality, wetland, and community impacts. The document was jointly prepared by the FAA and the Port of Seattle to ensure the proposed developments met federal and Washington State environmental policy requirements. -
1997-05-01
Final Supplemental EIS, Appendix F: DSEIS Response to Comments — Forecasts, Do-Nothing/With Project Capacity, and Forecast Ranges
This document is part of the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, addressing public comments on aviation demand forecasts and runway capacity planning. It explains how the 'Do-Nothing' and 'With Project' (Third Runway) alternatives were evaluated based on projected passenger and operations data through 2010, noting that the existing airfield has a maximum capacity of 460,000 annual operations. The document also acknowledges the inherent uncertainty in long-range aviation forecasts and clarifies that neither NEPA nor SEPA require the use of worst-case data in environmental reviews.