Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2611)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-04-07

    EXH AR044380: Subsurface Conditions Data Report, South MSE Wall and Adjacent Embankment, Third Runway Project, Sea-Tac International Airport

    Draft Subsurface Conditions Data Report prepared by Hart Crowser for Port Of Seattle and HNTB, project number J-4978-23, dated April 7, 2000. Covers geologic and subsurface soil conditions, hydrogeologic conditions, auger borings, Standard Penetration Test (SPT) procedures, test pit excavations, and monitoring well installation for the South MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) Wall and Adjacent Embankment
    TagsACC, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 18
  • 2000-04-05

    EXH AR024698: Memo — Roofing Options for Zinc Leaching Prevention

    A April 2000 memo from engineering firm Parametrix, Inc. evaluates roofing options to prevent zinc leaching from galvanized steel roofs on two Port of Seattle warehouses at Sea-Tac Airport. The study compared paint systems (ranging from $21,000–$240,000 for both buildings) against synthetic coverings such as spray-on elastomers and single-ply membranes ($60,000–$330,000), finding that painting is cheaper but requires more frequent maintenance while synthetic coverings last longer but cost more upfront. The memo recommends that any chosen material be evaluated to ensure it does not release metals or other pollutants into stormwater runoff.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-03-20

    EXH AR044225: Draft Subsurface Conditions Data Report, North Safety Area, Third Runway Embankment, Sea-Tac Airport

    Hart Crowser draft subsurface conditions data report (project J-4978-18) prepared for Port Of Seattle and HNTB, dated March 20, 2000, covering the North Safety Area Third Runway Embankment at Sea-Tac International Airport. Report includes generalized geologic description, subsurface soil conditions, hydrogeologic conditions, laboratory test results (consolidation, CU triaxial, UU triaxial, direct shear tests), hydraulic conductivity
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 18
  • 2000-03-07

    EXH AR026505: Memo — Soils Testing Results, Pesticides & Herbicides, Vacca Farm Site

    A March 2000 Parametrix memorandum reports the results of pesticide and herbicide soil testing at the Vacca Farm site, part of the Port of Seattle's Third Runway Project. Of 59 compounds tested, only 12 were detected, primarily organochlorine pesticides, with Dieldrin slightly exceeding cleanup levels in shallow soil samples at two locations in the proposed floodplain area. The memo recommends removing the upper six inches of soil from the floodplain area for offsite disposal, while concluding that the proposed Miller Creek relocation corridor does not pose unacceptable risks to human health.
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, Model Toxics Control Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2000-03-01

    EXH AR044438: SEPA Addendum — Port Of Seattle Master Plan Update, Auburn Wetland Mitigation Project, STIA

    SEPA Addendum (April 27, 2000) prepared by Port Of Seattle and FAA as addendum to the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Master Plan Update Development Actions at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA), and to the SEPA Environmental Checklist for the Auburn Wetland Mitigation Project (August 1998). Documents modification to Master Plan Update wetland
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SEPA, Third RunwayFolderBox 18
  • 2000-02-29

    EXH AR024703: Draft Memo — Evidence Summary, No Impacts to Miller & Des Moines Creeks from STIA Stormwater

    A February 2000 draft memo from environmental consultants Parametrix summarizes testing and monitoring data concluding that stormwater runoff from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) does not harm aquatic life in nearby Miller and Des Moines Creeks. Three lines of evidence are presented: whole effluent toxicity tests showing most outfalls are non-toxic, water effect ratio studies demonstrating that creek water significantly reduces copper toxicity, and metals monitoring confirming that copper concentrations in the creeks fell below water quality standards. The one outfall found to be toxic (SDN1) was traced to zinc leaching from galvanized rooftops, with the Port of Seattle pursuing corrective measures.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-02-28

    EXH AR024619: Draft Memo Range-Finding Water-Effect Ratios Miller & Des Moines Creeks

    A February 2000 draft memorandum from Parametrix, Inc. outlines a scope and budget for range-finding Water-Effect Ratio (WER) studies using receiving water from Miller and Des Moines Creeks, intended to help determine whether copper discharge standards at a Port facility could be adjusted through site-specific water quality criteria. The studies involve acute toxicity tests comparing copper-spiked site water to copper-spiked laboratory water, with estimated costs ranging from $2,110 for one site to $2,650 for two sites. Results from earlier 1999 range-finding tests suggested WERs high enough to potentially justify more definitive studies, but new tests without mixing zone assumptions were recommended to better assess achievable permit limits.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-02-28

    EXH AR024775: Draft Memo Range-Finding WERs Miller and Des Moines Creeks

    A February 2000 draft memorandum from Parametrix, Inc. outlines a scope and budget for range-finding Water-Effect Ratio (WER) studies using receiving water from Miller and Des Moines Creeks, conducted in connection with stormwater discharge permitting near the Port. The studies involve acute toxicity tests with copper-spiked water to determine whether site-specific water quality standards could be higher than generic state standards, potentially eliminating the need for a mixing zone. Estimated costs range from $2,110 for one creek site to $2,650 for two sites.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-02-14

    EXH AR024622: Draft Memo — Site-Specific WQC Copper Status Update, Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks

    A February 2000 internal draft memorandum from environmental consultants to Port of Seattle staff summarizes efforts to develop a site-specific water quality criterion for copper in Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks, in connection with stormwater runoff anticipated from a proposed third runway at Sea-Tac Airport. The memo evaluates two technical approaches—the Water-Effect Ratio (WER) and the site-specific metals translator—for potentially raising copper discharge permit limits, and outlines initial toxicity screening and range-finding study results. It also describes ongoing negotiations with the Washington State Department of Ecology regarding unresolved issues such as mixing zones, AKART requirements, and critical sampling conditions.
    TagsACC, Des Moines, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-02-08

    Exhibit 82: Email Chain RE Fill Criteria for the Third Runway — Ecology/Port Of Seattle Financial Arrangement Discussion

    Email chain dated February 8, 2000 among Washington State Department of Ecology staff (Roger Nye, Raymond Hellwig, Steve Alexander) regarding fill criteria compliance for the Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Roger Nye describes the 401/404 permit fill acceptance policy developed with Port Of Seattle governing contaminant criteria for borrow sources used in Third Runway construction
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 … Page 262
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Port Of Seattle 2019 budget reading & final adoption" — , 2018

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V