Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagNoise(310)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2020-06-11

    Substitute House Bill 1847 – Aircraft Noise Abatement – Defining aviation impacted area

    Washington State's Substitute House Bill 1847, signed into law in March 2020, expands the aircraft noise abatement programs available to port districts by lowering the qualifying threshold from 900 to 20 scheduled jet flights per day and extending the geographic boundaries of 'impacted areas' around airport runways. The law allows port districts to pursue noise relief measures—including property acquisition, soundproofing, transaction assistance, and mortgage insurance—for communities affected by aircraft noise. It amends three existing state statutes (RCW 53.54.010, 53.54.020, and 53.54.030) and took effect on June 11, 2020.
    CategoriesLegislation TagsAirport Noise Law, Noise, Port Of Seattle, RCW53, Washington State Legislature
  • 2020-05-29

    Stantec 2020 Sea-Tac Airport Impact Study: Appendix A, Section 4 – Community Input (pp. 41–43)

    A 2020 study gathered input from 48 community stakeholders near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, finding that while residents valued the economic benefits, jobs, and convenient access the airport provides, noise and air quality were the top concerns—especially for those living to the south and west under flight paths. Stakeholders raised issues including late-night flights, NextGen procedures concentrating aircraft noise, ultrafine particle pollution, and the limitations of existing noise mitigation programs. Traffic congestion and potential public health impacts from aircraft emissions were also frequently cited challenges.
    Tagscommunity engagement, MOV-UP, Noise, Sea-Tac Airport, Stantec
  • 2020-05-29

    Stantec 2020 Sea-Tac Airport Impact Study: Appendix A, Section 4 – Community Input (pp. 41–43)

    Appendix A, Section 4 of the Stantec-authored 2020 study on current and ongoing effects of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport operations, covering community input methodology and findings. Documents 48 stakeholder interviews conducted June–July 2019 across study area cities including SeaTac and Tukwila. Summarizes benefits (economic development, tourism, hotel tax revenue, Westfield Southcenter Mall, Port of Seattle employment,
    Tagscommunity engagement, MOV-UP, Noise, Sea-Tac Airport, Stantec
  • 2020-05-29

    Section 14: Summary — Study of the Current and Ongoing Effects of the Operation of the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    A 2020 study evaluated the positive, negative, and neutral effects of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on six nearby cities — Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, SeaTac, and Tukwila — using data spanning 1997 to 2019. The study found that noise was the top public concern, followed closely by air quality issues from aircraft operations, along with traffic congestion and distrust of the FAA and Port of Seattle. Researchers attempted to distinguish between impacts directly caused by airport operations and those resulting from the broader regional population growth that roughly doubled over the same period.
    TagsCommerce Impacts Study 2018, Noise, Sea-Tac Airport, South King County, Stantec
  • 2020-05-29

    Section 14: Summary — Study of the Current and Ongoing Effects of the Operation of the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    Section 14 Summary (pages A-354 to A-379) of the Stantec-led 2020 study commissioned under Department of Commerce Section 14, evaluating current and ongoing effects of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac Airport) operations on six study area cities: Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, SeaTac, and Tukwila. Covers study approach (data period 1997–2019, milestone years 1997,
    TagsCommerce Impacts Study 2018, Noise, Sea-Tac Airport, South King County, Stantec
  • 2020-05-29

    Stantec Sea-Tac Airport Communities Impact Study: Appendix A, Section 5 – Noise & Vibration

    This 2020 report examines how noise from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport has changed between 1997 and 2019, focusing on the impact of aircraft takeoffs, landings, and overflights on nearby communities. It explains key noise measurement concepts—including decibels, Sound Exposure Level (SEL), and the Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL)—and notes that while DNL is the federal regulatory standard used by the FAA, individual SEL events are often what residents find most disruptive. The report highlights a growing tension between how federal agencies measure and regulate aircraft noise and the real-world experience of people living under flight paths.
    TagsDepartment Of Commerce, FAA, Noise, Sea-Tac Airport, Stantec
  • 2020-05-29

    Stantec Sea-Tac Airport Communities Impact Study: Appendix A, Section 5 – Noise & Vibration

    Appendix A, Section 5 (pages 61–99) of the Stantec 2019/2020 Department of Commerce Sea-Tac Airport Communities Impact Study, dated 29 May 2020. Covers noise and vibration effects of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport operations from 1997 to 2019. Topics include aircraft noise metrics (Lmax, SEL, DNL), A-weighted decibel (dBA) scale, Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL), Sound Exposure
    TagsDepartment Of Commerce, FAA, Noise, Sea-Tac Airport, Stantec
  • 2020-04-14

    Report to Congress: FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115-254) Section 188 and Sec 173

    This April 2020 FAA Report to Congress evaluates alternative noise metrics to the current Day-Night Level (DNL) 65 decibel standard used to measure community aircraft noise exposure, as required by the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018. The report reviews the history and definitions of various noise measurement tools, explains why no single metric can address all aviation noise situations, and examines the roles of both noise modeling and actual noise sampling. It was produced in response to congressional direction to assess whether better methods exist for capturing and addressing community concerns about airplane noise.
    TagsDNL65, FAA, FAA Reauthorization, NEPA, Noise
  • 2020-03-24

    Contract Award: Agreement No. 20-042-RFP — Consulting Services for Aircraft Noise Study, Reagan National Airport

    Arlington County, Virginia awarded a consulting contract (No. 20-042-RFP) to ABCx2, LLC in March 2020 to study aircraft noise generated by Reagan National Airport air traffic affecting Arlington County, Virginia, and Montgomery County, Maryland, and to recommend mitigation strategies. The fixed-price contract is valued at up to $250,000 and covers an initial 12-month term with the option for two additional one-year renewals through March 2023. Note: This contract pertains to Reagan National Airport and Arlington/Montgomery County communities, not Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsAirport Noise Law, Noise, Noise Mitigation, Reagan National Airport
  • Contract 20 042 rfp fully executed noa pdf
    2020-03-24

    Contract Award: Agreement No. 20-042-RFP — Consulting Services for Aircraft Noise Study, Reagan National Airport

    Arlington County, Virginia contract award (Agreement No. 20-042-RFP, dated March 24, 2020) awarding ABCx2, LLC of Senoia, Georgia a fixed-price contract not to exceed $250,000 for consulting services to administer an aircraft noise study and identify noise mitigation strategies related to Reagan National Airport air traffic in proximity to Arlington County, Virginia, and Montgomery County,
    TagsAirport Noise Law, Noise, Noise Mitigation, Reagan National Airport

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 … Page 31
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR052145: Fill Criteria Derivation Chart for Third Runway Embankment" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V