Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEPA(100)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-10-20

    EXH AR019625: SSL MINTEQ Modeling — Background Pore-Water Chemistry, Assumptions, Limitations, Metal Kd Results

    This technical document describes the background water chemistry and modeling assumptions used to estimate how metals move through soil and groundwater at contaminated sites. It outlines key simplifications in the MINTEQ geochemical model, including the assumption of chemical equilibrium and the exclusion of redox potential, and presents soil-sorption values (Kd) for various metals such as arsenic, chromium, and cadmium that vary with soil pH. The results show that metal mobility is most strongly influenced by pH levels in the subsurface environment.
    TagsACC, Arsenic, EPA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2002-08-30

    Myths and Facts: Airport Pollutants, Aircraft Emissions, and Pollution Simulators

    This document debunks common myths about airport air pollution, noise, and emissions regulation, explaining that invisible pollutants can still reach dangerous levels, that fine particles from jet engines bypass the body's natural defenses, and that shoreline communities like those near Sea-Tac may face higher pollution concentrations due to wind patterns. It also reveals that neither the EPA nor FAA effectively regulates aircraft emissions or noise in ways that truly protect nearby residents, as regulatory authority rests with bodies like ICAO that are dominated by airline and airport interests. Additionally, the document highlights that official pollution modeling tools may significantly underestimate actual pollution levels, and that so-called 'noise abatement' programs often fail to reduce noise at all.
    TagsAviation Emissions, EDMS, EPA, ICAO, pollutionFolderARECO O'Hare
  • 2002-02-14

    Exhibit 2123: EPA IRIS QuickView — Antimony (CASRN 7440-36-0) and Arsenic, Inorganic (CASRN 7440-38-2)

    EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) QuickView pages for Antimony (CASRN 7440-36-0) and Arsenic, inorganic (CASRN 7440-38-2), accessed February 14, 2002. Antimony oral RfD is 4×10-4 mg/kg-day based on LOAEL of 0.35 mg/kg-day from Schroeder et al. 1970 rat chronic oral bioassay; confidence rated Low. Arsenic oral RfD is 3×10-4 mg/kg-day based on NOAEL of
    TagsACC, Arsenic, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, Health, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Toxicological SciencesFolderBox 14
  • 2001-06-08

    EXH AR023076: EPA Region 10 Letter to Army Corps re STIA Third Runway Wetlands Issues

    In June 2001, the EPA's Region 10 office submitted formal comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding the Port of Seattle's Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway project, which proposed filling over 18 acres of wetlands and 980 feet of Miller Creek. The EPA raised concerns about unresolved hydrological impacts, including the effects of a proposed retaining wall on nearby wetlands and groundwater flows, the adequacy of buffers around borrow pits, and the Port's undisclosed plans for vacant land parcels in the project area. The agency urged the Corps to carefully review these wetland and Clean Water Act compliance issues before issuing a construction permit.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, EPA, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2000-09-01

    Aircraft contrails factsheet

    This EPA fact sheet explains that aircraft contrails are line-shaped clouds made of ice crystals formed when water vapor in jet engine exhaust mixes with cold air at high altitudes. Contrails are composed primarily of water and do not pose direct health risks, but persistent contrails can spread into cirrus cloud cover and may influence the Earth's climate by affecting atmospheric cloudiness. Scientists estimate that persistent contrails cover about 0.1 percent of the Earth's surface on average, with the highest concentrations occurring over heavily trafficked air corridors like Europe and the United States.
    TagsAviation Emissions, Climate, Contrails, EPA, FactSheetFolderFAA
  • 2000-08-01

    Indoor air quality and student performance

    This EPA document explains how poor indoor air quality (IAQ) in schools can harm students' health and academic performance, causing absences due to respiratory illnesses and reducing the ability to concentrate, calculate, and remember. Studies show that high pollution levels, inadequate ventilation, and improper temperature and humidity control contribute to these problems. The EPA recommends schools use the IAQ Tools for Schools Kit to identify and address indoor air quality issues at little or no cost.
    Tagseducation, EPA, FAA, Health, indoor air quality, SchoolsFolderEPA
  • 2000-04-01

    EXH AR044580: Critical Review of the Use of Bioconcentration Factors for Hazard Classification of Metals and Metal Compounds

    Report prepared by Kevin V. Brix and David K. DeForest of Parametrix, Inc. for the International Lead Zinc Research Organization, International Copper Association, and Nickel Producers Environmental Research Association (NiPERA), April 2000. Reviews bioconcentration factors (BCFs) for metals including cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, and zinc in aquatic organisms (fish, bivalves, invertebrates, algae, diatoms). Covers
    TagsAcademic Journals, ACC, Environment, EPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water QualityFolderBox 18
  • 2000-03-01

    Addressing community health concerns around SeaTac Airport: Response to the question, ‘Is it possible to monitor jet engine exhaust emissions or to model their path using data on prevailing winds and takeoff patterns?’

    This March 2000 report, prepared by Washington State health and environmental agencies, examines whether jet engine exhaust emissions from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport can be monitored or modeled using wind and takeoff data. It reviews previous air quality studies, outlines health and environmental justice concerns for nearby communities, and recommends a structured air quality monitoring study with specific methods, data analysis approaches, and estimated costs. The report was developed in consultation with community representatives, the EPA, and local universities.
    TagsEcology, EPA, John Williamson, King County Public Health, PSCAA, University Of Washington, Washington State Department Of Health, Washington State UniversityFolderHealth
  • 2000-01-01

    EXH AR043247: Preliminary Data Summary — Airport Deicing Operations

    EPA report (EPA 821-R-00-001, January 2000) presenting a preliminary data summary of airport deicing operations. Covers aircraft and pavement deicing/anti-icing fluids including ethylene glycol-based compounds, fluid types, fluid application methods, variables affecting fluid use, nonchemical deicing methods, and NPDES/Clean Water Act wastewater concerns. Data collected via 1993 screener questionnaire, airport/vendor/POTW mini-questionnaires, EPA site visits, EPA
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Deicing, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 18
  • 1998-12-17

    EXH AR041832: Laboratory Guidance and Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Review Criteria

    Washington State Department of Ecology, Water Quality Program publication (WQ-R-95-80, revised December 1998) providing laboratory guidance and Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) test review criteria. Covers WET testing requirements in NPDES permits, options for permittees, invalid test criteria including EPA statistical flowcharts, negative controls, test termination, acceptable start counts, pH adjustment, randomization, and power standards. Also
    TagsACC, Ecology, EPA, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water QualityFolderBox 17

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V