Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEcology(797)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR015669: Direct Testimony of Erik Stockdale on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160

    Direct testimony of Erik Stockdale, Senior Wetlands Specialist at Washington State Department of Ecology, submitted in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board. Stockdale, a certified Professional Wetlands Scientist, evaluates wetland impacts from Port Of Seattle Master Plan Update projects at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Project will fill 18.37 acres of palustrine freshwater
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR012506: Declaration of John J. Strunk in Support of Port Of Seattle’s Response Opposing ACC’s Motion for Stay

    Declaration of John J. Strunk (geologist, Associated Earth Sciences Inc., AESI) filed in PCHB No. 01-133, Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, supporting Port Of Seattle’s response opposing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion for stay. Strunk details AESI’s groundwater evaluation at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA), including work on the Aircraft Operations and
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR028017: 25 Environmental Law 255 — Footnotes on Clean Water Act Section 401, Water Quality Standards, and Nonpoint Source Enforcement

    Pages 26-28 of law review article published at 25 Envtl. L. 255, containing footnotes FN148–FN189 covering Clean Water Act (CWA) enforcement topics including: NPDES permitting, nonpoint source pollution, Section 303(d) TMDL lists, Section 401 water quality certification, Section 1313(d), 33 U.S.C. ss 1319, 1341, 1365, 1377(e); cases including Northwest Envtl. Advocates v. City of Portland
    TagsACC, Caselaw, Clean Water Act, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR026409: Wetland Mitigation Calculations — Vacca Farm

    This document outlines wetland mitigation calculations for the Vacca Farm site, detailing compensation actions such as wetland restoration and enhancement across various locations including Lora Lake and prior converted croplands. Adjustments were made to credit acreages based on state ecology findings and documentation gaps; for example, the 6.60-acre converted cropland credit was reduced to 3.30 acres because the state identified those areas as existing wetlands requiring enhancement ratios rather than restoration ratios. In total, the site's original 10.48 credit acres were adjusted down to 5.61 acres after accounting for these regulatory and documentation considerations.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, Lora Lake, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR024993: Site-Specific Water Quality Standard WER Study Process Flowchart

    This document outlines the Port of Seattle's step-by-step process for applying water quality standards at a specific site, focusing on copper toxicity testing in local waterways. The flowchart guides researchers through a series of studies — including screening, range-finding, and definitive toxicity tests using waterfleas and fathead minnows — to determine whether copper levels in outfall and receiving waters pose environmental risks. Depending on test results and regulatory approval from the Washington State Department of Ecology, the process may lead to a Water Effect Ratio (WER) study or a Translator Study.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR024680: Presumed Ecology Position — Stormwater Mixing Zones

    This document outlines Washington State Department of Ecology's presumed policy positions on stormwater mixing zones, addressing when stormwater becomes regulated state water and how mixing zones should be calculated. It details recommended design storms for acute and chronic mixing zones, critical receiving water flow conditions, and background concentration requirements. The document also discusses circumstances under which mixing zone size criteria exceedances may be permitted under state regulations.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR024630: WAC 173-201A-100 Mixing Zones WA Water Quality Standards Surface Waters

    This Washington State administrative regulation establishes rules for 'mixing zones,' which are designated areas in bodies of water where pollutant discharges are allowed to mix and dilute before meeting water quality standards. The rules set strict size limits for mixing zones in rivers, estuaries, lakes, and ocean waters, and require that dischargers apply all available pollution-reduction technology before a mixing zone is approved. Special provisions are also included for storm water discharges and combined sewer overflows.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, WAC, Washington Administrative Code, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR024606: Points of Compliance — Mixing Zones & Stormwater Discharges to Surface Waters

    This document outlines regulatory problems and compliance points for stormwater discharges into Washington State surface waters, focusing on where discharges must meet water quality standards. It identifies four key unresolved issues, including the lack of an approved design storm for mixing zones and undefined critical receiving water conditions. Various example situations are provided to help determine the exact location where stormwater discharge compliance must be measured.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR023831: Ecology Draft Recommendations Low Flow Technical Report & Operation Plan

    This draft document from Washington State's Department of Ecology outlines requirements for a Low Flow Technical Report and a Low Flow Operation Plan related to MPU development activities. The Technical Report must include all calculations, engineering analyses, and hydrological studies needed to address low flow impacts, and must be stamped by a licensed Washington civil engineer. The Operation Plan must detail how stormwater and groundwater will be managed to mitigate those impacts, including maintenance procedures, performance standards, and methods to ensure those standards are met.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, WAC
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR035007: Curriculum Vitae — Don Weitkamp, Ph.D., Fisheries Biologist

    Curriculum vitae for Don Weitkamp, Ph.D. (Parametrix Principal), fisheries biologist specializing in salmon habitat issues in estuarine and freshwater environments in the Pacific Northwest. Documents expertise in chinook salmon habitat assessment, biological assessments (BAs), and habitat restoration in Commencement Bay, Green-Duwamish River, Elliott Bay, Columbia River, Snake River, and Puget Sound. Projects include Asarco shoreline
    TagsACC, Asarco, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Puget Sound, Salmon

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 … Page 80
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Boeing 777 Aircraft Materials Diagram" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V