Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-15

    Order granting appellants’ motion in limine to exclude late-produced plans and reports

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board granted the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion in limine to exclude late-filed plans and reports submitted by respondents (Washington Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle). The order excludes numerous proposed exhibits including the Embankment Modeling Report and Supplemental Wetlands Technical Memorandum, and prohibits respondents from relying on or testifying about
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-15

    Ecology’s response to ACC’s motion to exclude testimony from Dave Garland

    The Washington State Department of Ecology responds to Airport Communities Coalition’s motion in limine to exclude testimony from Dave Garland regarding the Port of Seattle’s December 2001 Low Flow Plan. Ecology argues that ACC was well aware of Garland’s role and expected testimony through prior depositions, interrogatory answers, and other witness depositions. Ecology contends that
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-15

    Ecology’s response to appellants’ motion in limine to exclude “late-produced” plans and reports

    The Washington State Department of Ecology concurs with and joins the Port of Seattle’s response to the Airport Communities Coalition’s Motion in Limine to exclude late-produced plans and reports. The case, PCHB No. 01-160, was heard before the Pollution Control Hearings Board. The filing is signed by Assistant Attorneys General on behalf of the Department
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-15

    Ecology’s response to ACC’s motion to publish depositions

    The Washington State Department of Ecology responds to the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion to publish deposition transcripts under CR 32(a)(2). Ecology argues the motion should be denied because ACC failed to show the depositions are admissible, the witnesses do not fall within the terms of the rule, and the motion was filed untimely on the
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-15

    Prefiled testimony of James C. Kelley, Ph.D. (with errata corrections)

    Prefiled direct testimony of Dr. James C. Kelley, a professional ecologist with Parametrix, Inc., submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board for Washington State in the case of Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle. The testimony addresses wetland delineation, classification, impact assessment, and compensatory mitigation
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-15

    Port Of Seattle’s response to appellants’ motion in limine to exclude ‘late-produced’ plans and reports

    The Port of Seattle responds to a motion by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) seeking to exclude 17 exhibits as untimely. The Port argues that the Board’s prehearing order only required early identification and completion of plans and reports prepared ‘pursuant to the §401 Certification,’ and that none of the
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-15

    Prefiled testimony of Joseph Brascher (with errata corrections)

    Prefiled testimony of Joseph Brascher, a hydrologist with AQUA TERRA Consultants, submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington in a case involving the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion versus the Washington Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. The testimony covers low streamflow modeling at Seattle-Tacoma
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-14

    Appellants’ motion in limine to exclude testimony from Ecology’s Dave Garland

    The Airport Communities Coalition filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude pre-filed and hearing testimony from Ecology’s Dave Garland regarding the Port of Seattle’s December 2001 Low Stream Flow Analysis. ACC argues Ecology failed to disclose Garland’s March 6, 2002 review memo and failed to identify the subject matter of his testimony despite repeated
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-14

    ACC’s motion to strike the pre-hearing brief of Port Of Seattle

    The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) filed a motion to strike the Port of Seattle’s pre-hearing brief, alleging it violated the Pollution Control Hearings Board’s Pre-Hearing Order by manipulating margins and line spacing to exceed the 30-page limit. ACC argues the Port effectively submitted a 37-page brief while ACC and CASE had to cut their own
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-14

    Order granting appellants’ motion in limine to exclude testimony of Ecology’s Dave Garland

    A proposed order from the Pollution Control Hearings Board granting Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion’s motion in limine to exclude testimony of Dave Garland of the Washington Department of Ecology. The order bars Ecology from offering Garland’s pre-filed testimony at hearing and from relying on his March 6, 2002 memorandum to Ann
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "KIRO7: Public weighs in on port of seattle sustainable airport master p" — , 2026

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V