Exhibit 449: Email Chain Re: Processed Materials and Fill Criteria Under 401 Permit — Port Of Seattle Third Runway

This 2001 email chain discusses how fill materials used in the construction of Seattle-Tacoma Airport's Third Runway Embankment should meet environmental criteria under a 401 water quality permit. State regulators and Port of Seattle staff debated which materials — including topsoil, utility backfill, base course, and general embankment fill — required testing, supplier certification, or quality assurance plans to demonstrate compliance. Officials agreed that highly processed materials like topsoil could be covered by supplier certification, while bulk embankment fill would require a statistical sampling and QA/QC program.

Notes

Exhibit 449 (AR 022826–022827). Email chain dated October–November 2001 between Ed Abbasi (Ecology), Ann Kenny, Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle), and Beth Clark regarding which processed fill materials are subject to the “fill criteria” condition (Condition E) of the Section 401 water quality certification for the Third Runway embankment at Sea-Tac Airport. Abbasi advises that topsoil suppliers may satisfy requirements via state 401 permit certification; backfill material and fill borrow material require a QA/QC sampling plan; gravel and similar materials require only supplier certificates identifying quality, quantity, and point of origin if delivered by multiple suppliers. Beth Clark’s underlying message lists specifications for topsoil, utility backfill, base course, and general embankment fill borrow material, proposing that topsoil, utility backfill, and base course not be subject to fill criteria under Condition E, while general embankment fill borrow material would be tested. Condition F.1 BMP requirements for utility corridors noted as unaffected.

V V