TagACC(1524)

Michael Feldman, Director of Aviation Facilities and Environmental Programs at the Port of Seattle, declares facts supporting the Port’s motion for partial summary judgment in PCHB Case No. 01-160. The declaration summarizes the history of environmental review for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update, including the FEIS, SEIS, FAA Record of Decision, and subsequent

An email from Peter Willing to John Strand reporting turbidity measurements taken during a Sea-Tac site visit on January 28, 2002. Two samples were recorded: tank farm outfall readings of 281 NTU and 299 NTU, compared to DM Cr (Des Moines Creek) readings of 31 NTU and 31.2 NTU. The document includes full email headers.

A letter from Gillis E. Reavis of Marten Brown attorneys to Kevin L. Stock of Helsell Fetterman enclosing two spreadsheets listing reference documents relied on by expert John Strunk in PCHB No. 01-160. The spreadsheets list documents related to preferential ground water flow paths relative to the proposed Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport, including studies

GeoSyntec Consultants, retained by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), submitted technical comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers reviewing the Port of Seattle’s Low Flow Analysis for the Third Runway Expansion Project. The letter identifies critical deficiencies in the Port’s analysis, including failure to account for initial years of water flow lag through the

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Waste Discharge Permit No. WA0037953 issued by Washington State Department of Ecology to Cascade Pole and Lumber Company, 1640 Marc Street, Tacoma, Washington 98421. Permit covers wood preserving facility discharging to Blair Waterway via Lincoln Avenue Ditch (Outfall 001, WA-10-0020) and Puyallup River (Outfall 002, WA-05-1003). Issued February 7,

GeoSyntec Consultants, retained by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), provides a technical review of the Port of Seattle’s Low Flow Analysis for the Third Runway Expansion Project at Sea-Tac Airport. The letter identifies critical deficiencies in the Port’s analysis, including failure to account for initial years of operation water requirements, unreliable long-term flow predictions, and

GeoSyntec Consultants, retained by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), submitted technical comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding the Port of Seattle’s Low Flow Analysis for the Third Runway Expansion Project at Sea-Tac Airport. The letter critiques the Pacific Groundwater Group’s November 2001 embankment fill modeling report, identifying key deficiencies including failure to

GeoSyntec Consultants, on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), submitted technical comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding the Port of Seattle’s Low Flow Analysis for the Third Runway Expansion Project at Sea-Tac Airport. The letter critiques the Pacific Groundwater Group’s November 2001 embankment fill modeling report, identifying failures to account for

The Pollution Control Hearings Board denied a motion for summary judgment filed by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) regarding whether the Port of Seattle was required to obtain a water right to implement low stream flow conditions in its §401 certification for the Third Runway expansion. The two-member Board reached contrary positions on the motion,

A cover letter from Helsell Fetterman LLP attorney Peter J. Eglick to Roger A. Pearce of Foster Pepper & Shefelman, transmitting field notes from a January 28, 2002 site visit by Peter Willing and Bill Rozeboom. The letter relates to the case Airport Communities Coalition v. Ecology and Port of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160. Attached