TagThird Runway(1067)
-
2000-07-25
EXH AR020963: Sea-Tac Groundwater Study Flat File Format Ref Data — Associated Earth Sciences Inc
This document contains reference data for the Seatac Groundwater Study, compiled by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. The dataset, totaling 10.4 MB across 17 files, includes flat-file format tables covering bore holes, water levels, geology, hydraulic parameters, and well segments related to groundwater conditions in the Sea-Tac area. The materials were submitted as a legal exhibit and are part of the broader environmental record associated with Sea-Tac Airport. -
2000-07-24
Airport-expansion official jumps to other side
By George Erb Jul 23, 2000 Barbara Hinkle’s new job is the talk of five suburban cities in South King County. Hinkle was a senior environmental program manager at the Port of Seattle, where she spent 10 years overseeing environmental studies and permit applications for building a third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. But in early -
City Life (SeaTac)
BEST MAYOR Frank Hansen, SeaTac’s first mayor, is still considered our best. Hansen has won Best Mayor for as long as SeaTacians have been sending in Best of SeaTac ballots. Hansen, a retired airline pilot, compares early SeaTac politics to the Wild West. Anybody could get things done in that free-for-all environment, he says, given -
2000-06-27
EXH 366: Columbia Biological Assessments Letter Reviewing STIA Runway Fill Hydrologic Studies — ACC Expert Review Fishery Wetland Impacts
A fisheries biologist hired by the Airport Communities Coalition reviewed a Washington State Department of Ecology hydrologic study of the Sea-Tac runway fill project, concluding that the study significantly underestimated impacts on local fish and wetland habitats in Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks. The reviewer found that the study failed to accurately document fish species present, overlooked key wetlands supporting salmon and cutthroat trout, and inadequately assessed the consequences of relocating nearly 1,000 feet of Miller Creek to accommodate runway expansion. The letter argues that the Ecology department accepted the Port's claims of habitat improvement without requiring a thorough analysis of the substantial fish and invertebrate communities that would be destroyed. -
2000-06-21
EXH AR023949: Hydrogeologic Study — IWS Plant and Lagoons, STIA
This 2000 hydrogeologic study, prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. for the Port of Seattle, examines groundwater conditions beneath the Industrial Waste System (IWS) plant and lagoons at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The report assesses soil geology, groundwater flow direction, and water quality — including levels of volatile organic compounds, petroleum hydrocarbons, and ethylene glycol — near three wastewater lagoons on airport property. It concludes with findings and recommendations related to potential contaminant releases and ongoing groundwater monitoring needs. -
2000-06-19
EXH 410: Sea-Tac Runway Fill Hydrologic Studies Report
This June 2000 report by Pacific Groundwater Group examines the hydrological impacts of proposed runway fill construction at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. It covers groundwater conditions, surface water management, effects on local wetlands and fish habitat in Miller and Walker Creeks, and reviews stormwater control proposals. The study was prepared for the Washington State Department of Ecology to assess how the Third Runway embankment fill would affect the surrounding hydrologic environment. -
2000-06-19
EXH AR045023: Sea-Tac Runway Fill Hydrologic Studies Report
Sea-Tac Runway Fill Hydrologic Studies Report (AR 045023, project JE9907) prepared by Pacific Groundwater Group, Ecology and Environment, and Earth Tech Inc. for Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, dated June 19, 2000. Report covers hydrologic and hydrogeologic characterization of the Sea-Tac Airport third runway embankment fill area, including Miller Creek and Walker -
2000-06-14
EXH 261: Biological Assessment — Master Plan Update Improvements, STIA
This June 2000 Biological Assessment, prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for the Federal Aviation Administration and Port of Seattle, evaluates the potential environmental impacts of proposed Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on federally listed species. The report examines effects on aquatic resources including Chinook salmon, bull trout, and their critical habitats within nearby waterways such as Miller Creek, Des Moines Creek, and the Green River. It was prepared to support Section 7 consultation under the Endangered Species Act with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service. -
2000-06-12
EXH AR017776: Lessons Learned from “Big” Projects — Recommendations for SEA Program
Email from Andy McMillan (SEA program) dated June 12, 2000, forwarded by Tom Luster to Raymond Hellwig on October 6, 2000, transmitting the official version of a Word document titled “Lessons Learned from Big Projects: Recommendations for SEA Program.” The attached document outlines 7 recommendations developed from SEA program staff experiences with large, complex projects -
2000-06-06
EXH AR021325: Columbia Biological Assessments to WDFW — SR-509 Temp Interchange Fisheries Impacts S 176th St
A fisheries biologist hired by the Airport Communities Coalition assessed the potential environmental impacts of a temporary SR-509 interchange construction project near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, concluding that the project posed serious risks to fish and wetland resources in Walker Creek. The report found that proposed erosion control measures, such as silt fences and whattles, were grossly inadequate given the steep terrain (slopes of 40–60%) adjacent to Wetlands 43 and 44, and that sediment-laden stormwater runoff containing metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons would likely reach these sensitive areas. The biologist also criticized the Port of Seattle and its contractor, Parametrix, Inc., for failing to conduct fish species inventories and for providing little documentation to support their claim that no significant wetland impacts would occur.