Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1067)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-09-07

    EXH 238: ACC Letter to Ecology — 401 Certification STIA Master Plan Update Preliminary SMP Review Comments

    A September 2000 letter from the Airport Communities Coalition to the Washington State Department of Ecology raises concerns about the adequacy of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's Stormwater Management Plan submitted for 401 Certification. The letter identifies potential flaws in the analysis of base flow impacts on Miller Creek, inconsistencies between the new plan and earlier natural resource mitigation documents, and concerns about proposed changes to watershed basin boundaries. The authors argue that insufficient time was provided for proper review and that the plan fails to fully account for cumulative water quantity impacts of future development.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-09-07

    EXH 238A: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Letter to Ecology — 401 Certification STIA Master Plan Update Stormwater Management Plan Preliminary Review

    A September 7, 2000 letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants to the Washington State Department of Ecology raises concerns about the adequacy of the Port of Seattle's Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac Airport's Master Plan expansion. The letter identifies significant technical discrepancies in the plan's analysis of baseflow impacts on Miller Creek, questions the reliability of proposed water-rights acquisitions as mitigation, and flags inconsistencies between the stormwater plan and the Natural Resource Mitigation Plan. The consultants also object to the limited time provided for independent review of the four-volume plan and warn that cumulative water quantity impacts of future commercial development in the airport acquisition area have not been adequately assessed.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-09-07

    EXH AR046005: Draft Memorandum — Methods and Results of Liquefaction Analyses, Third Runway Embankment, Sea-Tac, Washington

    Draft memorandum J-4978-28 from Hart Crowser (Douglas Lindquist, Barry Chen PhD P.E., Michael Bailey P.E.) to Jim Thomson P.E. at HNTB, dated September 7, 2000, presenting methods and results of liquefaction analyses for the proposed Third Runway embankment and retaining walls at Sea-Tac, Washington. Analyzed 120 borings with Standard Penetration Test (SPT) results from 112
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 19
  • 2000-09-07

    Exhibit 138: Smith & Lowney Letter to Ecology Regarding Port Of Seattle NPDES Permit Violations and Third Runway Water Quality Certification

    Fax cover sheet and two-page letter dated September 7, 2000 from Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney, P.L.L.C. to Raymond Hellwig (Director, NW Regional Office, Washington Department of Ecology) and Tom Luster (Permit Coordination Unit, Ecology), on behalf of Citizens Against Seatac Expansion (CASE) and Waste Action Project (WAP). Letter transmits a 60-day Notice
    TagsACC, CASE, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2000-09-06

    EXH 237: Email Chain Rozeboom to Fitzpatrick — Response Status July 31 Comments STIA 3rd Lagoon Expansion

    This document contains a September 2000 email exchange regarding the proposed expansion of Lagoon #3 in the Sea-Tac Airport Industrial Wastewater System (IWS), in which consultant Bill Rozeboom follows up on unresolved comments submitted to the Washington State Department of Ecology. The attached July 31, 2000 comments raise concerns about discrepancies in the lagoon's design capacity, the risk of frequent overflow into Des Moines Creek, and potential wildlife hazards near aircraft movement areas that may violate FAA guidelines. Additional issues flagged include incomplete construction plans, unaddressed lagoon deficiencies, and the apparent overlap of the lagoon expansion project with 3rd runway construction activities affecting nearby wetlands.
    TagsACC, Ecology, NPDES, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-09-06

    Exhibit 85: Email Chain RE: Use of Contaminated Fill for Sea-Tac Third Runway Project

    Email chain dated September 5-6, 2000, among Raymond Hellwig, Chung K. Yee, Kevin Fitzpatrick, and Tom Luster (Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality Program) and paralegal Andrea Grad (Helsell Fetterman) on behalf of ACC (Airport Communities Coalition). Discusses use of contaminated fill for Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway project, Method A soil
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2000-09-06

    EXH 348: Letter Water Resources Consulting to Ecology – Des Moines Creek Flow Augmentation Facility Implementation Plan

    A water resources consultant submitted comments to the Washington State Department of Ecology in September 2000, raising serious concerns about the Port of Seattle's proposed Des Moines Creek Flow Augmentation Facility, which was intended to mitigate water quality impacts from SeaTac Airport's third runway expansion. The consultant argues the plan is vague and incomplete, lacking secured water sources, hydrologic analysis, and finalized design details. Key technical problems identified include unreliable water temperature from one proposed source, dependence on continuous technological systems, and a disputed well design that may violate state groundwater protection guidelines.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2000-09-05

    EXH AR045805: Subsurface Conditions Data Report — Additional Field Explorations and Advanced Testing, Third Runway Embankment, Sea-Tac International Airport

    Draft subsurface conditions data report prepared by HartCrowser for HNTB regarding the Third Runway Embankment at Sea-Tac International Airport, project numbers J-4978-23, -26, -27, and -31. Covers additional field explorations and advanced geotechnical testing including auger borings, standard penetration tests (SPT), Shelby tubes, pocket penetrometer, test pits, piezocone penetrometer probes, cone penetration tests (CPT), and
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 19
  • 2000-09-01

    EXH AR023005: ACC Analysis Proposed Mitigation Ratios STIA Third Runway Wetland Impacts

    A September 2000 report by Azous Environmental Sciences, commissioned by the Airport Communities Coalition, critically analyzes the Port of Seattle's wetland mitigation plan for the SeaTac Third Runway construction project. The report identifies numerous errors in wetland acreage accounting, inadequate mitigation ratios, and flaws in the proposed compensatory measures, including out-of-basin mitigation that fails to replace lost wetland functions in the affected Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creek watersheds. The author concludes that the Port's plan falls short of Washington State Department of Ecology standards and the regulatory goal of no net loss of wetland functions.
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2000-09-01

    EXH AR025072: Des Moines Creek Flow Augmentation Preliminary Design — STIA

    This September 2000 preliminary design report, prepared by Kennedy/Jenks Consultants for the Port of Seattle, outlines a plan to augment water flow in Des Moines Creek near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The report covers facility configuration, process components such as backflow prevention, dechlorination, and aeration systems, as well as an evaluation of chemical dechlorination alternatives. The project was designed to improve creek water quality by treating and releasing water in a controlled manner.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 … Page 107
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Recommended Noise Remedy Boundary Map — Sea-Tac Airport Part 150 Study" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V