Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1067)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-08-24

    EXH AR017275: Ecology Internal Email — Comments on Draft Clean Fill Criteria Language for 401 Certification, Third Runway

    Internal email chain from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick (Supervisor, Industrial Permit Unit, Water Quality Program, NWRO, Washington Department of Ecology) dated August 24, 2000, commenting on draft clean fill criteria language for the 401 Certification for the Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Comments address sections E6, E7c.2(b), E7c.2(e), E7c.2(f), and E7c.3, covering issues
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2000-08-24

    EXH AR017487: Email RE: Draft Language for Clean Fill Criteria in 401 Certification — Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick

    AR017487. Email from Chung K. Yee (Ecology, NWRO Water Quality Program) to Kevin Fitzpatrick dated August 24, 2000, commenting on draft clean fill criteria language for the 401 Certification for the Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Comments address sections E6, E7c.2.(b), E7c.2.(e), and E7c.3, covering inappropriate fill, EPA databases, Confirmed & Suspected Contaminated Sites Report,
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2000-08-21

    EXH AR045646: Geotechnical Input to MSE Wall and Reinforced Slope Design, Third Runway Embankment

    Draft memorandum dated August 21, 2000 from Jamie Beaver, Mike Bailey P.E., and Barry Chen P.E. of Hart Crowser, Inc. to Jim Thomson at HNTB (project J-4978-30) providing geotechnical design information for RECo for MSE wall and reinforced embankment fill design for the Third Runway Embankment at Sea-Tac Airport. Document includes minimum factors of safety
    TagsACC, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 19
  • 2000-08-16

    EXH AR022982: ACC Review Wetlands Mitigation Plan STIA Third Runway Construction

    A wetland scientist hired by the Airport Communities Coalition reviewed the Port of Seattle's proposed wetland mitigation plan for the SeaTac Third Runway construction and concluded it was wholly inadequate. The report argues that the planned out-of-basin mitigation at an Auburn site fails to replace the wetland functions lost in the Walker Creek, Des Moines Creek, and Miller Creek watersheds, and that placing mitigation in a different drainage basin cannot scientifically compensate for local losses under Washington State environmental law. The reviewer also warns that the Auburn mitigation site faces multiple risks and is unlikely to be sustainable long-term.
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2000-08-14

    Exhibit 725: Memorandum on Critical Condition for WER-Related Sampling, Port Of Seattle Third Runway Stormwater Discharge into Miller Creek

    Memorandum from Brian Pippin (Parametrix, Inc.) to Linda Logan (cc: John Brooker), dated August 14, 2000, Project Number 556-2912-001, Port of Seattle WERs. Discusses critical conditions for Water Effect Ratio (WER) sampling per the Permit Writers Manual for the third runway treated stormwater discharge into Miller Creek. Uses HSPF hindcasting over 49-year period to evaluate
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-08-09

    EXH AR045601: Evaluation of Perched Zone Interception and Possible Impacts to Wetland Hydrology, Borrow Area 3, Sea-Tac Third Runway

    Hart Crowser draft report prepared for Port of Seattle, August 9, 2000 (J-4978-13), evaluating perched groundwater zone interception and potential wetland hydrology impacts from Borrow Area 3 excavation for the Sea-Tac Third Runway project. Addresses Pacific Groundwater Group (PGG, 2000) concerns commissioned by Washington State Department of Ecology regarding impacts to Wetland 29. Includes ModFlow
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 19
  • 2000-08-01

    EXH AR045478: Ground Water Study — STIA Quarterly Ground Water Level Measurements, C1 (Qva) Monitoring Well Network

    Letter dated August 1, 2000 from Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI), Project No. BV97016D, to Mr. John Wietfeld and Mr. Roger Nye of Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, on behalf of Port Of Seattle. Transmits quarterly ground water level measurements for Q1–Q4 from select wells completed in the C1 (Qva) advance outwash
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 19
  • 2000-07-31

    EXH 236: Letter Northwest Hydraulic Consultants to Army Corps & Ecology — STIA Third Runway Stormwater Management Plan Approval Process

    In a July 31, 2000 letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants — representing the Airport Communities Coalition — raised concerns about unresolved technical problems with the Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's proposed third runway. Independent reviews had identified serious flaws in hydrologic modeling that could result in undersized stormwater facilities failing to meet flow control requirements. The consultants urged regulators to publicly disclose ongoing SMP discussions and allow meaningful time for further review before approving the project.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-07-31

    EXH 236A: NHC Letter to Army Corps & Ecology — Stormwater Mgmt Plan Approval Process, STIA Third Runway

    In a July 31, 2000 letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants raised concerns about unresolved technical problems with the Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for the proposed third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Independent reviews had found serious flaws in the hydrologic modeling that could result in undersized facilities failing to meet flow control requirements. The firm requested full public disclosure of ongoing SMP discussions and a meaningful comment period before any regulatory approval of the runway project.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-07-27

    EXH AR023201: Letter to Ecology Transmitting Third Runway Fill Material Env. Docs, Q2 2000

    A July 27, 2000 letter from the Port of Seattle's Environmental Program Manager transmits environmental documentation to the Washington Department of Ecology regarding fill material used in the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway Project during the second quarter of 2000. The documentation, developed in accordance with the 1999 Airfield Project Soil Fill Acceptance Criteria, includes a fill summary table listing sources such as borrow pits, port property transfers, and construction sites, along with estimated fill volumes. A cumulative fill summary is also provided, covering all fill material placed from January 1998 through December 1999.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 … Page 107
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "South King County Fund background and proposal process" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V