Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(1845)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-01-15

    PCHB Doc 005048: ACC Letter to Presiding Officer Cottingham Opposing Port Of Seattle Emergency Status Conference Request

    Letter dated January 15, 2002 from Peter J. Eglick of Helsell Fetterman LLP to Hon. Kaleen Cottingham, Presiding Officer of the Pollution Control Hearings Board, in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC v. Dept. of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. ACC opposes Port Of Seattle’s emergency request for status conference, arguing it is premature pending ACC’s response
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-01-14

    PCHB Doc 005454: Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Compel Depositions and for Limitation on Entry onto Land

    Port Of Seattle motion filed January 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, opposing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC). Port Of Seattle moves to compel ACC to make designated witnesses available for deposition per the Board’s Prehearing Order of October 30, 2001, and to impose CR 34(b)
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-01-14

    PCHB Doc 5063: Ecology’s Response to ACC’s Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding the Absence of a Water Right

    Washington State Department of Ecology’s response to Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion for summary judgment in PCHB No. 01-160, filed January 14, 2002 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board. Ecology argues that a water right is not required for reasonable assurance that water quality standards will be met under Clean Water Act § 401 Certification.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-01-14

    PCHB Doc 005078: Port Of Seattle Memorandum in Opposition to ACC’s Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding the Absence of a Water Right for Third Runway § 401 Certification

    Port Of Seattle memorandum filed January 14, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160, opposing ACC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the issue of whether a water right is required for the Third Runway § 401 Certification stormwater management system. Port argues no water right has ever been required to manage stormwater in Washington under NPDES
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2002-01-11

    PCHB AR 005457: Port Of Seattle Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Depositions and for Limitation on Entry onto Land

    In early 2002, the Port of Seattle filed a legal memorandum seeking to compel the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) to make its witnesses available for deposition and to place limits on a requested inspection of Port property near Sea-Tac Airport. The Port objected to ACC's demands for unrestricted site access for 17 people, unlimited environmental sampling across 18 acres of wetlands and multiple creeks, and refusal to disclose sampling locations or methods in advance. ACC, in turn, refused to schedule any depositions until the site visit dispute was resolved.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2002-01-11

    EXH AR005302: ACC’s Motion to Extend Discovery Schedule — PCHB No. 01-160

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion filed in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Environmental Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, seeking to extend the discovery schedule against Port Of Seattle and Department of Ecology. ACC requests extension of Port Of Seattle witness deposition deadline from February 1, 2002 to February 25, 2002; final
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-01-11

    EXH AR005316: Declaration of Michael P. Witek in Support of ACC’s Motion to Compel Inspection of Port Property and to Extend Discovery Schedule

    Declaration by Michael P. Witek filed in PCHB Case No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle) supporting ACC’s motion to compel inspection of Port Of Seattle property and to extend discovery schedule. Document relates to Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-01-11

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Granting ACC’s Motion to Compel Inspection of Port Property

    Proposed order in PCHB No. 01-160 granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion to compel inspection of Port Of Seattle property. Orders Port Of Seattle to confer with ACC counsel within two days to schedule site visits for ACC experts, counsel, paralegal, and two client representatives to observe, photograph, and sample wetlands, soils, and streams within
    TagsACC, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-01-11

    EXH AR005384: Order Granting ACC’s Motion to Extend Discovery Schedule — PCHB No. 01-160

    Proposed order from the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC)’s Motion to Extend Discovery Schedule. Extends time for ACC to depose Port Of Seattle witnesses from February 1, 2002, to February 25, 2002; extends filing of ACC’s final exhibit list from February 8, 2002, to March 1, 2002;
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-01-11

    EXH AR005408: Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Subpoenas Duces Tecum — PCHB No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle motion filed January 11, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, seeking to compel Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) to produce all documents responsive to the Port’s Requests for Production propounded November 9, 2001. ACC refused to produce any documents in response to Request for Production
    TagsACC, Legal, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 … Page 185
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • KCIA 2026 FOD Walk
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Aug 15, 7:30am - 10:00am
    9404 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108
    Event image 2

    Museum of FlightSeattle, WA Saturday, August 15  •  7:30 AM – 10 AM Overview Join us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk—let’s keep the runway clean and have some fun together! Join Us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk! Get ready to step out and enjoy an awesome in-person event all about keeping our spaces

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "seatac-grow-01-expansion-corner-rgb" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V