Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(1845)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-01-23

    EXH AR004644: Letter from Michael P. Witek (Helsell Fetterman) to Presiding Officer Cottingham Re: ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, No. 01-160, with Wallula Power Project Site Certification Cover Sheet and 50 C.F.R. §402.02

    Letter dated January 23, 2002 from attorney Michael P. Witek of Helsell Fetterman to Presiding Officer Kaleen Cottingham of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, No. 01-160. Transmits two enclosures inadvertently omitted from Exhibit D to the Second Declaration of Michael P. Witek
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-01-23

    EXH AR004654: Declaration of Jeff Kray — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Declaration of Jeff Kray, Assistant Attorney General of Washington, Ecology Division, filed January 23, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) are appellants against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Attaches two documents: (1) Amended Final Findings
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-01-23

    EXH AR004678: Port Of Seattle’s Reply Supporting Motion To Compel Document Production — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s reply brief supporting its motion to compel document production in Pollution Control Hearings Board Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Filed January 23, 2002. Port argues ACC has produced zero documents despite Port producing 22 boxes, 23 compact discs, and 4 hard diskettes. Port
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2002-01-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Discovery Order and Modification of Pre-Hearing Deadlines — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case 01-160 discovery order dated January 22, 2002, resolving four motions: ACC’s motion to compel inspection of Port Of Seattle airport property, ACC’s motion to extend discovery schedule, Port Of Seattle’s motion to compel depositions and limit entry onto land, and Port Of Seattle’s motion to compel production of documents
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-01-21

    EXH AR031548: Wetlands on STIA North End Properties — Supplemental Information Regarding Wetlands (Parametrix Technical Memorandum)

    Parametrix, Inc. technical memorandum dated January 21, 2002, from Jim Kelley, Ph.D., to Muffy Walker, US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch, regarding Port Of Seattle permit 1996-4-02325 (Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update). Provides supplemental information on wetland impacts in upper watersheds of Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek, including percent loss of
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan
  • 2002-01-18

    EXH AR004748: Port Of Seattle’s Reply Memorandum on Motion to Compel Depositions and for Limitation on Entry onto Land — PCHB No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s reply memorandum filed January 18, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle) supporting its motion to compel ACC depositions and impose limitations on site visit entry onto land. Port argues ACC has produced zero documents, unilaterally refused to make any
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-01-18

    EXH AR004752: ACC’s Reply on Motion to Compel Inspection of Port Property

    Reply brief filed January 18, 2002 by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160 (ACC v. Department of Ecology et al.) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington. ACC argues in support of its motion to compel inspection of Port Of Seattle property under CR 34, seeking access to inspect, test, and
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-01-18

    EXH AR004755: ACC’s Reply on Motion to Extend Discovery Schedule, PCHB No. 01-160

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) reply brief filed January 18, 2002, in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board, opposing Port of Seattle’s resistance to extending the February 1, 2002 discovery deadline. ACC argues Port of Seattle refused site visit access until January 16, 2002, withheld expert data and reports, and failed to
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-01-18

    EXH AR004759: Ecology’s Response to ACC’s Motion to Extend the Discovery Schedule

    Response filed January 18, 2002 by the State of Washington Department of Ecology (represented by Attorney General Christine O. Gregoire, Thomas J. Young, Jeff Kray, and Joan M. Marchioro) opposing ACC’s motion in PCHB No. 01-160. Ecology agrees to extend discovery cutoff to February 15, 2002 (not February 25 as ACC requested), but opposes extending
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-01-18

    EXH AR028522: Summary Statement for Deposition Publication — Thomas Fitzsimmons, Director, Ecology, PCHB No. 01-160

    Summary statement for deposition publication submitted by ACC and CASE in ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160, pursuant to Order Granting Appellant’s Motion to Publish Depositions dated March 19, 2002. Deponent is Thomas Fitzsimmons, Director, Department of Ecology, deposed January 18, 2002. Testimony offered per CR 32(a)(2)
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 … Page 185
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • KCIA 2026 FOD Walk
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Aug 15, 7:30am - 10:00am
    9404 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108
    Event image 2

    Museum of FlightSeattle, WA Saturday, August 15  •  7:30 AM – 10 AM Overview Join us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk—let’s keep the runway clean and have some fun together! Join Us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk! Get ready to step out and enjoy an awesome in-person event all about keeping our spaces

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "HF Cong Smith Aviation Impacted Communities Act – Fact Sheet (01.14.25)" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V