Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEnvironmental Impact Statement(325)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1996-12-01

    EXH AR040251: JARPA Application for Proposed Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    JARPA (Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application) and Section 404 application submitted by Port Of Seattle to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Jack Kennedy, Seattle District Office) in December 1996, prepared by Parametrix, Inc. Requests authorization to place fill material into waters of the United States at Sea-Tac Airport associated with the Master Plan Update
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Environmental Impact Statement, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 17
  • 1996-12-01

    Miller Creek Relocation Plan for Proposed Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    This 1996 plan by Parametrix, Inc. outlines the proposed relocation of Miller Creek to accommodate expansion improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. It assesses the creek's existing ecological conditions—including fish habitat, hydrology, and riparian vegetation—and identifies the construction impacts the relocation would cause. The document then presents mitigation goals, site selection rationale, and engineering details for redesigning the creek channel to offset environmental impacts.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Landrum & Brown, Miller Creek, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderThird Runway
  • 1996-11-25

    Letter from A. Brown to City of Burien: Comments on South King County Impact Assistance and Mitigation Studies Team Draft

    A Normandy Park resident and aerospace engineering manager submitted detailed comments in November 1996 criticizing a draft impact study related to Sea-Tac Airport's proposed Third Runway, arguing that the analysis underestimated real estate value losses, air pollution risks, and traffic disruptions caused by the project. The letter contends that home values in Normandy Park stagnated or declined after the Third Runway was publicly announced, and that any valid property value assessment must use baseline figures from before negative publicity began. The author also challenges the study's air quality modeling assumptions and traffic analysis, warning that the Port of Seattle would selectively cite favorable findings while ignoring methodological flaws.
    TagsArlene Brown, CASE, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, City of Burien, City of Normandy Park, Environmental Impact Statement, Frederick Stouder, HOK, Normandy Park, Property Values, Third RunwayFolderCASE
  • 1996-10-01

    Memorandum of Agreement: Air Quality Monitoring Program Activities Relating to the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Vicinity

    This 1996 Memorandum of Agreement establishes a 24-month air quality monitoring program near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, involving the Port of Seattle, FAA, EPA, Washington State Department of Ecology, and the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency. The program, funded at $195,000, focuses on measuring carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and aircraft fuel particle residue to establish baseline air quality data and evaluate potential pollution impacts from planned airport expansion projects. The Port agreed not to proceed with expansion elements projected to cause carbon monoxide standard violations until monitoring is complete and, if necessary, mitigation measures are identified.
    TagsEcology, EIS, Environmental Impact Statement, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, FAA, Mic Dinsmore, Port Of Seattle, PSAPCA, PSCAA, Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan, Third RunwayFolderThird Runway
  • 1996-08-23

    CASE & RCAA Appeal of Port Of Seattle Resolution No. 3212 (Third Runway Vote)

    In August 1996, community groups CASE and RCAA formally appealed the Port of Seattle's Resolution No. 3212, which approved construction of a third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The appeal argued that newer navigation technologies such as Localizer Directional Aid (LDA) and GPS, combined with demand management strategies, could provide equivalent airport capacity at far lower cost and with less environmental harm. The groups requested a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to evaluate these technology-based alternatives and reconsider the third runway decision.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsCASE, Environmental Impact Statement, RCAA, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderCASE
  • 1996-07-11

    EXH AR037736: Puget Sound Regional Council Resolution A-96-02 Amending the 1995 Metropolitan Transportation Plan for Long-Term Commercial Air Transportation Capacity

    Resolution A-96-02 adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) General Assembly on July 11, 1996, amending the 1995 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) to include plans for a third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport with additional noise reduction measures. References Resolution A-93-03, Expert Arbitration Panel on Demand/System Management and Noise,
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 15
  • 8099 third runway decision process pdf
    1996-06-20

    Summary of the Regional Council’s Decision Process Relating to Amending the Metropolitan Transportation Plan to Include a Third Runway at Sea-Tac International Airport with Additional Noise Reduction Measures

    Title page of a Puget Sound Regional Council document dated June 20, 1996, summarizing the Regional Council's decision process relating to amending the Metropolitan Transportation Plan to include a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport with additional noise reduction measures.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Flight Plan Project, Puget Sound Regional Council, RASP, Third RunwayFolder07-Executive Board-General Assembly-Amendment MTP
  • 1996-06-20

    Summary of the Regional Council’s Decision Process Relating to Amending the Metropolitan Transportation Plan to Include a Third Runway at Sea-Tac International Airport with Additional Noise Reduction Measures

    This 1996 Puget Sound Regional Council document summarizes the decision-making process behind adding a third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, tracing planning efforts from the late 1980s through 1996. It outlines how regional studies, including the Flight Plan Project and an Expert Panel evaluation, concluded that no feasible alternative airport sites existed and that options like high-speed rail or congestion pricing could not replace the need for the new runway. The amendment to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan was approved subject to conditions requiring noise reduction measures and demand management actions.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Flight Plan Project, Puget Sound Regional Council, RASP, Third RunwayFolder07-Executive Board-General Assembly-Amendment MTP
  • 1996-05-28

    Environmental Impact Statement Addendum To: The Flight Plan Project Final EIS (1992) and the Proposed Master Plan Update Development Actions at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Final EIS (1996)

    In May 1996, the Puget Sound Regional Council issued this Environmental Impact Statement Addendum to evaluate a proposal to add a third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) with specific noise reduction measures. The addendum was needed because a prior 1993 resolution authorizing the third runway had lapsed after the Port of Seattle failed to meet an independent noise-reduction review deadline by April 1, 1996. The Council considered new conditions and expert panel recommendations to reintroduce the third runway into the region's Metropolitan Transportation Plan while addressing community noise concerns.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Puget Sound Regional Council, Sea-Tac Airport, SEPA, Third RunwayFolderPRR-2026-07-30
  • 6153 EIS addendum pdf
    1996-05-28

    Environmental Impact Statement Addendum To: The Flight Plan Project Final EIS (1992) and the Proposed Master Plan Update Development Actions at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Final EIS (1996)

    Puget Sound Regional Council EIS addendum dated May 28, 1996, serving as a SEPA addendum to the Flight Plan Project Final EIS (1992) and the Master Plan Update Development Actions at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Final EIS (1996). The document concerns a proposed amendment to the Aviation Program and Appendix P – Resolution A-93-03 of the
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Puget Sound Regional Council, Sea-Tac Airport, SEPA, Third RunwayFolderPRR-2026-07-30

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 … Page 33
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR050078: Draft Memorandum — Proposed Liquefaction Procedure Under Walls and Slopes, Third Runway Embankment" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V