Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1548)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-02-20

    PCHB Doc 3518: CASE’s Final List of New Witnesses and Exhibits, PCHB No. 01-160

    Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) final witness and exhibit list filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160), dated February 20, 2002, in the matter of Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Witnesses listed: Kate Rhoads and Bob Furstenberg of King County DNR. Exhibits include construction stormwater monitoring
    TagsACC, CASE, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, NPDES, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH 390: STIA Aerial Photographs 1997 2001

    These two aerial photographs, dated 1997 and 2001, show overhead views of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) and its surrounding neighborhoods. The images, produced by Walker & Associates and entered as Exhibit 390 in a February 2002 proceeding, document the airport's runway layout and adjacent residential and commercial areas over time. They appear to be part of an administrative record (AR 021768–021769) related to airport noise policy or land-use impact analysis.
    TagsACC, Map, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Walker & AssociatesFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-19

    Exhibit 730: Handwritten Meeting Notes — Embankment Model, Fill Modeling, Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines County Monitoring

    Handwritten meeting notes dated February 19, 2002, AR 026595–026597, attended by Pony Ellingson, Joe Brascher, Paul Fendt, Keith Smith, Felix Kristandovitch, Nick Stackellburg, Kelly Whiting, Ray Helwig, and Ed Abbasi. Topics include embankment model (Figure 5-4, Appendix B, Slice I model, MSE wall, infinite permeability assumption, coarse fill), fill modeling footprint area with surface groundwater
    TagsACC, Des Moines, Fill Dirt, Handwritten Notes, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Walker Creek Basin PlanFolderBox 10
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH AR021775: ACC First Supplemental Response to RFP No. 2 & Interrogatory No. 5 — Expert Witness Reference List

    This legal document is a supplemental response filed by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board case (No. 01-160) against the State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. It lists scientific references and studies relied upon by ACC's expert witnesses, covering topics such as the effects of airport deicing chemicals on water quality, dissolved oxygen levels in receiving streams, fluoride impacts on salmon, and toxicity of stormwater runoff to aquatic life near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Deicing, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-19

    PCHB Doc 3705: Letter from Rachael Paschal Osborn to Kaleen Cottingham Re ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160 — Service Dispute on Port’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue

    Letter dated February 19, 2002 from attorney Rachael Paschal Osborn (Spokane) to Kaleen Cottingham, Presiding Officer of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), in ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160. Osborn disputes timely service of Port of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue filed February 8,
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SEPAFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH AR003709: Ecology Memorandum in Response to Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue — PCHB No. 01-160

    Washington State Department of Ecology memorandum supporting Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA compliance issue in PCHB No. 01-160. Filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board by Assistant Attorneys General Joan M. Marchioro, Thomas J. Young, and Jeff B. Kray. Ecology argues ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SEPAFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH 459: Proposed Agenda Low Streamflow Analysis Meeting – Walker, Miller, Des Moines Creeks

    This document is an agenda for a Low Streamflow Analysis Meeting held on February 19, 2002, at the Department of Ecology in Bellevue, Washington. The meeting covered technical modeling and water flow topics for three local waterways — Walker Creek, Miller Creek, and Des Moines Creek — including reviews of land cover tables, groundwater routing, and calibration. General topics such as water quality monitoring, channel hydraulics, and embankment modeling were also on the agenda.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Walker Creek Basin Plan, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH AR053453: Future Subbasins, Watersheds and Detention Facilities Map

    AR 053453. Map prepared by Parametrix, Inc. dated February 19, 2002, depicting future subbasins, watersheds, and detention facilities at Sea-Tac Airport. Shows water features including Miller Creek, Old Madres Creek, Walker Creek, detention facilities, proposed stormwater management facilities, reactive low-flow vaults and infiltration facilities, Master Plan impervious surfaces, future watershed boundaries, future subbasin boundaries, discharge
    TagsACC, Map, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderBox 22
  • 2002-02-19

    Exhibit 2128: Inter-Local Agreement Between Ecology and Port Of Seattle for STIA Master Plan Update Oversight

    Facsimile cover sheet dated 2-19-02 from Ray Hellwig, Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office (Bellevue, WA), to Tom Young (AAG), transmitting 11 pages including a Port of Seattle memorandum dated February 7, 2002 and an Inter-local Agreement between State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle for oversight of construction projects
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Interlocal Agreement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport Master PlanFolderBox 14
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH 387: Vacca Farm & West Side Field Observations Jan–Feb 2002

    These are handwritten field observation notes dated January 31, 2002, documenting wetland and upland buffer conditions near Miller Creek and Vacca Farm, including plant communities, wetland boundaries, and buffer zones. The notes reference site observations about existing wetland conditions, vegetation types (including cattails, alder, sedge, and Phalaris), and questions about the extent of wetland fill and excavation. The observations appear to relate to an environmental review of proposed land use changes adjacent to Miller Creek, with reference to an upland buffer plan (STA-7805).
    TagsACC, Handwritten Notes, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 09

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 … Page 155
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V