Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1548)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-02-14

    PCHB Doc 3718: Pollution Control Hearings Board’s Response to Motion to Set Aside Agency Action (Port Of Seattle v. PCHB, ACC, Ecology)

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) response filed in Thurston County Superior Court case No. 01-2-02386-9, Port Of Seattle v. State of Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board, Airport Communities Coalition, and State of Washington Department of Ecology. Filed February 14, 2002, hearing set February 22, 2002 before Judge Richard D. Hicks. Addresses Port Of Seattle’s Motion
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-14

    Exhibit 2123: EPA IRIS QuickView — Antimony (CASRN 7440-36-0) and Arsenic, Inorganic (CASRN 7440-38-2)

    EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) QuickView pages for Antimony (CASRN 7440-36-0) and Arsenic, inorganic (CASRN 7440-38-2), accessed February 14, 2002. Antimony oral RfD is 4×10-4 mg/kg-day based on LOAEL of 0.35 mg/kg-day from Schroeder et al. 1970 rat chronic oral bioassay; confidence rated Low. Arsenic oral RfD is 3×10-4 mg/kg-day based on NOAEL of
    TagsACC, Arsenic, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, Health, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Toxicological SciencesFolderBox 14
  • 2002-02-14

    EXH AR024303: Marten Brown Letter to Kevin Stock Transmitting Elizabeth Clark Fill Sources Notes

    A February 2002 letter from Marten Brown Attorneys at Law transmits Excel spreadsheets containing Elizabeth Clark's notes on fill sources related to the case ACC v. Port of Seattle. The attached spreadsheets provide a cumulative fill summary for the Draft Third Runway project at Sea-Tac Airport, detailing fill sources, suppliers, volumes, and placement locations across three construction phases spanning 1997–2001. Sources include borrowed pit materials, city transfers, and various property acquisitions used to build runway embankments and stockpiles.
    TagsACC, Fill Dirt, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2002-02-13

    EXH 358: Increasing Hardness Effect on Freshwater Acute WQ Standards — Copper & Zinc, WAC 173.201A.040

    This document is a February 2002 fax from Water Resources Consulting LLC addressing the effect of increasing water hardness on fresh water acute water quality standards, referencing WAC 173.201A.040. It contains tables calculating acute water quality standards for copper and zinc at varying hardness levels in fresh water. The document appears to be part of an administrative record (AR 021262) and was transmitted between consultants, though its connection to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy is not evident from the content.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, WAC, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-13

    EXH AR021135: Increasing Hardness Effect on Freshwater Acute WQ Standards WAC 173.201A.040 — Copper & Zinc

    This document presents a technical analysis of the effect of increasing water hardness on Fresh Water Acute Water Quality Standards, referencing WAC 173.201A.040. It includes calculated values for copper and zinc acute water quality criteria at varying hardness levels (ranging from 10 to 110 mg/L), showing how the allowable concentrations change as hardness increases. The document was transmitted via fax in February 2002 from Water Resources Consulting LLC.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, WAC, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-12

    EXH 362: CV John A. Strand PhD FAIFR Fisheries Biologist

    This document is the curriculum vitae of Dr. John A. Strand, a fisheries biologist with 30 years of experience studying the effects of human activities on aquatic resources. His work spans Washington, California, Alaska, and other regions, covering environmental impact assessments, aquatic toxicology, and regulatory compliance related to contaminants such as oil, heavy metals, and radionuclides. While not directly related to airport noise policy, his expertise in endangered species protection and habitat mitigation may have been relevant to environmental review processes in the Seattle-area region.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Puget Sound, Salmon, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-11

    EXH AR021292: Analytical Resources Inc. Letter to Smith & Lowney — CASE Water Sample Analysis Results, EB44

    A February 2002 analytical laboratory report from Analytical Resources, Inc. to Seattle law firm Smith & Lowney, documenting water sample testing results for a project referenced as Case 2. Four water samples were collected on January 31, 2002, and analyzed for metals, conventional parameters, and glycols, with the glycol analysis requiring re-testing due to calibration issues outside acceptable control limits. The results showed no detectable levels of ethylene glycol or propylene glycol above the 5.0 mg/L detection limit.
    TagsACC, CASE, Ethylene Gycol, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-11

    EXH 321: CV K.M. Leytham PhD PE, Engineering Hydrologist, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants

    This document is a professional curriculum vitae for Dr. K.M. Leytham, Ph.D., P.E., an engineering hydrologist with extensive experience in flood analysis, stormwater management, and catchment hydrology modeling. Dr. Leytham holds degrees from the University of Birmingham, MIT, and the University of Washington, and has worked on projects across North America and internationally. His project experience includes dam safety reviews, flood reduction studies, and reservoir inflow analyses, primarily with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants in Seattle.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-11

    EXH 322: Flow Rate vs. Time — Minute, Hourly & Infiltration Capacity Diagram

    This document, marked as Leytham Exhibit 222 (dated 2/11/02), contains a hand-drawn diagram illustrating flow rate over time, showing the relationship between minute and hourly measurements alongside an infiltration capacity curve. The sketch plots flow rate on the vertical axis against time intervals (15, 30, 45, 60 minutes) on the horizontal axis, with a shaded area indicating peak flow. It appears to be a technical exhibit related to stormwater or drainage analysis presented in proceedings concerning Sea-Tac Airport policy.
    TagsACC, Handwritten Notes, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-11

    EXH AR021084: Analytical Resources Inc. Cover Letter & Chain of Custody — CASE 1 Water Sample (Glycols, Metals, TSS)

    A February 2002 letter from Analytical Resources, Inc. to attorney Richard Poulin of Smith & Lowney, P.L.L.C. transmits laboratory analytical results for nine water samples accepted on January 28, 2002, under Case 1. The samples were received intact with no discrepancies noted on the chain of custody record, and analysis for requested parameters including glycols, TSS, copper, zinc, and hardness proceeded without incident. Quality control results, including a method blank showing no detected ethylene or propylene glycol above 5.0 mg/L, are included in the report.
    TagsACC, CASE, Ethylene Gycol, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 09

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 … Page 155
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V