Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagKing County(412)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-02-23

    EXH AR034844: King County Review Comments on Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, December 2001

    King County Department of Natural Resources draft review comments (AR034844-034846) on the Port Of Seattle / Parametrix Inc. December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. Review evaluates HSPF hydrologic modeling, impact assessment, and conceptual design of low-flow offset facilities for Miller Creek and Walker Creek against Washington State Department
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 14
  • 2001-12-11

    EXH AR019740: Hart Crowser Letter to Ecology — Professional & Owner/Agency Certification, NE 4th St & 108th Ave, Bellevue

    In December 2001, Hart Crowser, Inc. submitted Washington State Department of Revenue forms to the Department of Ecology certifying an environmental remedial action at a property located at the corner of NE 4th Street and 108th Avenue in Bellevue, King County. The Professional Certification was signed by Matthew F. Schultz, P.E., confirming that the cleanup was conducted independently and in a manner consistent with Washington's Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA). The filing sought a Washington State sales tax exemption and business and occupation tax credit for the environmental remedial action project (J-7600000).
    TagsACC, Department of Revenue, Ecology, King County, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 09
  • 2001-10-30

    EXH 307: Draft Meeting Notes – Low Flow Analysis, STIA Third Runway, Oct 30, 2001

    These draft meeting notes from October 30, 2001 document a technical review session in which Port of Seattle consultants disclosed and explained several errors found in the low streamflow modeling for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway project. The key errors included a 1/24th magnitude conversion factor mistake in embankment fill data input, incorrect input files used for embankment modeling, and an overlap in which approximately 8 acres of the Walker Creek embankment appeared to be counted in both the Hydrus embankment model and the HSPF stream model. The meeting outlined corrective steps to be taken by the Port's consulting team to fix these errors before finalizing the revised Low Streamflow Analysis required under 401 Permit conditions.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-10-30

    EXH AR022925: 401 Permit Post-Issuance Clarification STIA Third Runway — Final Meeting Notes, Low Flow Analysis

    Meeting notes from an October 30, 2001 technical session addressing errors discovered in the low streamflow modeling for Sea-Tac International Airport's Third Runway project. Consultants identified six modeling errors, including a conversion factor mistake that caused embankment flow contributions to be understated by a factor of 24, along with incorrect input files and improper groundwater routing. Representatives from the Port of Seattle, King County, the Department of Ecology, and the Army Corps of Engineers agreed on corrective revisions to be incorporated into a revised Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal required under the 401 Permit.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-10-25

    Exhibit 53: Pre Low Flow Meeting Briefing — King County Review of Port Of Seattle HSPF Hydrologic Modeling

    Email from Kelly Whiting (King County Department of Natural Resources, Water and Land Resources Division) to Ann Kenny and Raymond Hellwig, dated October 25, 2001, summarizing a pre-meeting briefing on revised low flow hydrologic modeling related to Port Of Seattle airport embankment impacts. Discusses Hydrocomp (Norm Crawford) independent review findings, HSPF modeling errors including incorrect
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-10-19

    EXH AR017661: RE: Low Flow Meeting — Email Chain, October 19, 2001

    Email chain dated October 19, 2001 among Kathryn Snider (Floyd Snider McCarthy, Inc.), Kelly Whiting (Metro King County), Ann Kenny, Keith Smith (Port Of Seattle Water Resources Manager), and David Masters regarding a proposed Low Flow Meeting scheduled for October 30, 2001 at Kate Snider’s office (8:30–11:30 AM). Kelly Whiting requests a meeting agenda or
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsACC, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-10-01

    PCHB No. 01-133: Port Of Seattle’s Memo Opposing ACC’s Motion for Stay — Declaration of Paul S. Fendt, Volume 3 of 3

    PCHB case No. 01-133, Volume 3 of 3 of Port Of Seattle’s memorandum opposing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion for stay, containing Declaration of Paul S. Fendt. Includes August 3, 2001 letter from King County Department of Natural Resources to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue WA 98008-54552,
    TagsACC, King County, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 05
  • 2001-10-01

    PCHB Doc 01-133: Declaration of Edward O’Brien — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Declaration of Edward O’Brien, Washington Department of Ecology Water Quality Program employee since 1979, filed in PCHB No. 01-133 (Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle). O’Brien describes his familiarity with the 1992 Stormwater Management Manual for Puget Sound, the 1999 Draft Manual, and the final September 27,
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 04
  • 2001-09-12

    EXH AR023891: Contract Amendment Request — King County Review Services, Ecology Third Runway Permit Appeal

    This document is an email chain from September 2001 in which King County's David Masters notifies Ann Kenny that spending on a contract for technical review services provided to the Washington State Department of Ecology has exceeded its $95,000 limit by $23,695. Masters proposes amending the contract to increase the budget by $170,000 to a new total of $265,000, covering anticipated work such as low-flow analysis, preparation of appeal materials, and potential expert witness testimony. Ann Kenny forwarded the information to Michael Cheyne to facilitate the contract amendment process.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR017574: King County Letter to Ecology on Port Of Seattle Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements

    Letter dated August 3, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director of King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist at Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, conveying King County’s technical review findings on the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Update (MPU) Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderBox 08

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 … Page 42
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Puget Sound Regional Council: General Assembly" — , 2018

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V