Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagKing County(412)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH 1268: King County DNR Letter to Ecology STIA Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan

    In August 2001, King County's Department of Natural Resources wrote to the Washington Department of Ecology confirming that the Port of Seattle's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac International Airport Master Plan improvements met the technical requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The review found that the plan demonstrated a feasible conceptual strategy for managing stormwater from proposed airport construction projects. Reviewers noted that while the plan showed compliance with design standards, additional oversight and monitoring would be needed as individual projects moved from planning into construction.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR024388: King County Review Comments Low Flow Impact Analysis & Offset Facility Proposal, Jul 2001

    In August 2001, King County's Department of Natural Resources submitted a technical review letter to the Washington Department of Ecology evaluating the Port of Seattle's Low Flow Impact Analysis and proposed offset facilities for stormwater management near Sea-Tac Airport. The review found the proposal goes well beyond the basic requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual and represents substantial mitigation for low flow impacts in affected drainage basins, including Miller and Walker Creeks. Reviewers noted several inconsistencies and data gaps in the documentation and recommended that a final consolidated document be prepared incorporating all corrections and technical memoranda.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR050909: King County Review Comments on Port Of Seattle Low Flow Impact Analysis – Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, July 2001

    Letter dated August 3, 2001 from King County Department of Natural Resources Director Pam Bissonnette to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, transmitting King County’s technical review comments on the Port Of Seattle’s Low Flow Impact Analysis – Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal (July 2001). The enclosure provides
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 21
  • 2001-07-09

    EXH AR020456: Draft Meeting Notes – Low Flow Analysis, STIA Third Runway 401 Permit, July 9, 2001

    These draft meeting notes from a July 9, 2001 technical meeting cover low flow analysis related to the 401 Permit decision-making process for Sea-Tac International Airport's Third Runway project. Attendees from the Department of Ecology, King County, Port of Seattle, and several consulting firms discussed methods for determining low stream flow impacts and mitigation requirements across affected watersheds. Key topics included biological effects on fish habitat, a proposed 0.1 cfs mitigation flow for the Des Moines Watershed, and the use of 2-year 7-day low flow rates to guide mitigation planning.
    TagsACC, Des Moines, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-07-05

    EXH AR029198: 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway — Technical Meeting Notes and Schedule Update, July 5, 2001

    Final draft meeting notes from July 5, 2001 technical meeting on 401 Permit Decision-Making for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway, prepared by Rachel McCrea of Floyd & Snider Inc. Attendees include Ann Kenny (Dept. of Ecology), Kelly Whiting (King County), Keith Smith (Port of Seattle), Felix Kristanovich (Foster Wheeler), Paul Fendt and Tom Atkins (Parametrix),
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 11
  • 2001-07-02

    EXH AR023805: Email Chain – Non-Hydrologic Effects Water Rights Relinquishments & Summer Low Flow Analysis

    In a July 2, 2001 email chain, Kelly Whiting of Metro King County raises concerns about the analysis of 'non-hydrologic' effects related to water rights relinquishments and their impact on summer low flows in a Sammamish River watershed study. Whiting questions the assumptions made about non-respondents to a water withdrawal survey, arguing that the rates assigned to them appear disproportionately high compared to trends shown by actual survey respondents. The email requests a walkthrough during an upcoming Thursday meeting to clarify how these figures would be incorporated into a low-flow mitigation plan.
    TagsACC, King County, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-07-02

    EXH AR023807: Email Whiting to Kenny — Ecological Input Stream Hydrology Mitigation

    A July 2001 email from King County engineer Kelly Whiting summarizes ecological recommendations regarding proposed stream flow mitigation measures. A lead stream ecologist advised that mitigation plans be compared against existing stream hydrology to avoid abrupt changes that could disrupt biological processes, such as sudden summer flow increases confusing fish behavior. The ecologist also emphasized that water quality factors like temperature and dissolved oxygen are as important as flow rates, and suggested introducing reserved water gradually through ponds or wetlands rather than directly into streams.
    TagsACC, King County, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-06-27

    EXH AR029194: 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway — Final Draft Technical Meeting Notes, June 25 & 27, 2001

    Final draft meeting notes prepared by Rachel McCrea of Floyd & Snider Inc. for 401 Permit Decision-Making technical meetings on June 25 and June 27, 2001, regarding Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway. Attendees included Ann Kenny and John Drabek (Dept. of Ecology), Kelly Whiting (King County), Keith Smith (Port of Seattle), Paul Fendt and Tom
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 11
  • 2001-06-22

    Aerial View of Urban Freeway Interchange Near Seattle

    Aerial photograph of a large multi-level highway interchange surrounded by green vegetation, with a commercial/retail area visible in the upper left including what appears to be a Sears store and associated parking lots. The interchange handles multiple directional traffic flows via elevated ramps and overpasses, consistent with a major urban freeway junction in the Seattle/Puget Sound region.
    TagsKing County, Puget Sound, SeattleFolderWatershed Aerial Photos
  • 2001-06-22

    Aerial View of Public Storage Facility, Apartments, and Freeway in South King County

    Aerial photograph showing a suburban landscape with a large self-storage facility bearing orange-and-white unit doors (consistent with Public Storage branding), adjacent apartment complexes, a used car lot, and a multi-lane freeway. The density of conifers, road layout, and general development pattern are consistent with the greater Sea-Tac/South King County, Washington area.
    TagsKing County, Land Use, Sea-Tac Airport, South King CountyFolderWatershed Aerial Photos

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 … Page 42
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "City of Burien – Mathison Park Trees Update" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V