Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagFAA(684)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1992-11-20

    Airport planning: Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, State of Washington

    In a November 1992 letter to the FAA's Northwest Mountain Region manager, the President of the Regional Commission on Airport Affairs urges the federal government to defer funding and detailed planning for a proposed third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac). The letter argues that the Puget Sound Regional Council's ongoing regional airport system planning process must be allowed to fully evaluate all alternatives before any single project receives federal financial commitment. The author warns that proceeding prematurely with site-specific plans and an Environmental Impact Statement risks wasting federal money if the regional plan ultimately selects an alternative other than a third runway at Sea-Tac.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsFAA, Flight Plan Project, Puget Sound Regional Council, RCAA, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderRCAA
  • 1992-06-12

    Flight Patterns – FAA’s ‘Four Post’ traffic plan for planes is illogical, insulting

    June 12, 1992 Publication: THE SEATTLE TIMES Page: A9 Word Count: 354 The Ninth Circuit in San Francisco recently voted that since the noise level was not above 65 decibels (recently raised from 55 decibels) the Federal Aviation Administration did not have to be subject to any environmental impact requirements. Therefore, the FAA’s brilliant “four post” plan remains
    CategoriesCorrespondence, From The Web TagsFAA, Four Post Plan, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Seattle Times
  • Seattle Community Council Federation v. FAA 961 F.2d 929

    961 F.2d 829 SEATTLE COMMUNITY COUNCIL FEDERATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION; Samuel Skinner, Respondents. No. 90-70253. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 8, 1991. Decided April 9, 1992. Peter J. Eglick and Henryk J. Hiller, Seattle, Washington, for petitioner. Peter R. Steenland, Jr., and J.
    CategoriesLitigation TagsDNL65, FAA, Four Post Plan, SCCF, Seattle Community Council Federation
  • 1992-04-09

    Seattle Community Council Federation v. F.A.A., 961 F.2d 829 (9th Cir. 1992)

    In 1992, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the FAA's decision to change flight patterns for turbine-powered aircraft at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport without preparing a full Environmental Impact Statement. The FAA had issued a Finding of No Significant Impact based on a computer noise model using the 65 decibel day-night sound level as the threshold for significant noise impact, which the court found to be a reasonable approach. The Seattle Community Council Federation had challenged the decision, arguing that the FAA failed to adequately assess the noise effects on surrounding communities.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, FAA, Four Post Plan, NEPA, SCCF, Seattle Community Council FederationFolderFour Post Plan
  • 1992-03-06

    Letter from James D. Chalupník to Richard Aramburu Regarding Sea-Tac Aircraft Noise Study 2: Ldн Metric and Integrated Noise Model

    In this 1992 letter, acoustics expert James D. Chalupník explains to attorney Richard Aramburu how aircraft noise near Seattle's Sea-Tac Airport is measured and rated, focusing on the appropriateness of the Ldn metric and the data used in the FAA's Integrated Noise Model (INM). He outlines the key physical properties of noise—intensity, frequency distribution, and fluctuation over time—and describes how various weighting schemes, particularly the A-weighting (dBA) scale, are used to approximate human perception of loudness and annoyance. The letter also notes the limitations of simpler metrics and introduces more sophisticated rating methods such as Stevens' Loudness Level and Perceived Noise Level for evaluating aircraft noise.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsFAA, INM, Noise, Part 150, Sea-Tac AirportFolder1993
  • 1992-02-01

    Des Moines Creek water quality study

    A 1992 water quality study of Des Moines Creek, prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for the FAA and Port of Seattle, assessed the health of the creek during storm runoff events. The creek, which originates near Sea-Tac International Airport and flows to Puget Sound, had its aquatic ecosystem severely damaged by jet fuel spills in 1985 and 1986. The study sampled seven locations along the creek and three tributaries to identify water quality problems and determine whether stormwater pollution from airport operations was causing toxic conditions.
    TagsDes Moines Creek, FAA, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderDes Moines
  • 1992-01-01

    EXH AR037747: Flight Plan Project Draft Final Report and Technical Appendices (Including Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement)

    AR037747. Draft Final Report of the Puget Sound Air Transportation Committee’s Flight Plan Project, January 1992, sponsored by the Puget Sound Regional Council and Port Of Seattle with FAA grants. Study findings and draft recommendations for long-term air carrier system needs of the Puget Sound Region, including a Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. Committee chaired
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Flight Plan Project, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Puget Sound Regional CouncilFolderBox 16
  • 1991-03-31

    Port Of Seattle Flight Track Sample: South Flow Arrivals/Departures — Pre- and Post-Four Post Plan Comparison Maps

    These two Port of Seattle Flight Track Sample maps compare jet aircraft arrival and departure patterns at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA) under south flow conditions, one from March 22, 1989 (pre-4 Post) and one from March 31, 1991 (4 Post). Both charts plot all jet flight tracks between approximately 4:30–24:00 and 6:00–22:00 respectively, showing how flight paths over the Seattle region shifted between the two periods. The maps are annotated to highlight southbound departures and arrivals over Seattle, serving as visual evidence for noise impact analysis related to airport runway and procedure policy changes.
    TagsFAA, Flight Tracks, Four Post Plan, Noise Abatement Procedures, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderFour Post Plan
  • 1990-04-02

    Four-Post Plan to Be Implemented by FAA

    On April 2, 1990, the FAA announced it would implement the 'Four-Post Plan,' a set of air traffic control procedural changes at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport designed to reduce congestion, improve efficiency, and address worsening arrival delays. The plan, developed after nearly a year of public meetings, environmental review, and computer simulation of 13 alternatives, was determined to produce no significant noise impact on surrounding communities. The FAA cited a 30,000 increase in annual landings and takeoffs since 1988 and the failure of mediation talks to produce an agreed-upon flight path solution as key reasons for moving forward with the changes.
    TagsAir Traffic Control, FAA, Four Post Plan, Sea-Tac AirportFolderFour Post Plan
  • 1990-03-31

    Final Package of Mediated Noise Abatement Actions for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Agreed to by the Mediation Committee, March 31, 1990

    This 1990 document outlines a comprehensive package of noise abatement actions for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, agreed upon by a Mediation Committee on March 31, 1990. It covers measures such as nighttime flight restrictions, soundproofing programs for nearby homes and public buildings, improved flight corridors, and a new noise management monitoring system. According to the technical consultant involved, full implementation of these agreements could reduce noise levels by approximately 50% for communities surrounding the airport.
    CategoriesHistory TagsFAA, Flight Tracks, Four Post Plan, Noise Abatement Procedures, Noise Remedy Program, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Noise Abatement Committee, Vince MestreFolderFour Post Plan

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 … Page 69
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Historic Property Inventory Report: Hillgrove Cemetery, Sea-Tac, WA" — , 2010

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V