Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEcology(797)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-02-12

    EXH AR019613: WAC 173-340-747 Deriving Soil Concentrations Groundwater Protection MTCA

    This Washington State regulation (WAC 173-340-747) establishes methods for determining safe soil contamination levels that protect groundwater quality at cleanup sites. It outlines several scientific approaches, including three-phase and four-phase partitioning models, leaching tests, and empirical demonstrations, to calculate the maximum allowable concentration of hazardous substances in soil before they risk contaminating groundwater. The regulation requires that soil concentrations not cause groundwater cleanup level exceedances and not result in the buildup of nonaqueous phase liquids in or on groundwater.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, WAC
  • 2001-02-12

    EXH AR017506: WAC 173-340-740 MTCA Cleanup Regulation — Unrestricted Land Use Soil Cleanup Standards

    WAC 173-340-740 from the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Cleanup Regulation, published February 12, 2001, establishing unrestricted land use soil cleanup standards. Covers Method A, Method B (standard and modified), and petroleum mixture cleanup levels including Equations 740-1 through 740-3 for noncarcinogens and carcinogens. Specifies default exposure parameters: soil ingestion rate 200 mg/day, average body
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, WAC
  • 2001-02-08

    Exhibit 2060: Ecology Response to PDA Requests on Dam Safety and MSE Wall Review, Plus Memorandum on Retaining Wall Alternatives for Miller Creek

    Email dated February 8, 2001 from Ann Kenny (Ecology Senior Environmental Specialist) to Andrea Grad, Peter Eglick, and Kevin Stock responding to PDA requests regarding Chapter 173-175 WAC Dam Safety review of Port Of Seattle Third Runway stormwater facilities. Covers ISW Lagoon #3, 25.5 acre-foot pond (SDW1A), 37.91 acre-foot pond (SDW1B), MSE wall Dam Safety
    TagsACC, Ecology, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-02-08

    EXH AR023692: Ecology Audit Request, Grant, Agreed Order #97T-N122, STIA

    In February 2001, a Washington State Department of Ecology site manager requested an audit of a Port of Seattle grant (Grant No. G0000052) tied to Agreed Order #97T-N122, citing concerns about potential duplicate funding where costs could be covered by both the grant and cost recovery from other parties. The grant, worth up to $861,000 (split 50/50 between state and local funds), was issued to support a Phase 1 groundwater study at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac), investigating contamination from jet fuel and petroleum products released from underground storage tanks and fuel distribution systems. The study aimed to model groundwater flow and assess risks to nearby public drinking water wells and surface water bodies.
    TagsACC, Audit, Ecology, Grants, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2001-02-07

    Exhibit 2059: Email and Memorandum on Retaining Wall/Slope Alternatives to Reduce Impacts to Miller Creek, Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport

    Exhibit 2059 (AR 031711–031713, ECY00010776–10778). Email from Gus Ordonez to Ann Kenny dated February 7, 2001, transmitting a memorandum from Jerald LaVassar, M.S., P.E. to Tom Luster reviewing the report ‘Evaluation of Retaining Wall/Slope Alternatives to Reduce Impacts to Miller Creek, Embankment Station 174+00 to 186+00’ for the Third Runway project at Sea-Tac International Airport.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-02-01

    EXH AR026134: Guidelines Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans Environmental Studies

    This Washington State Department of Ecology publication, authored by Stewart M. Lombard and Cliff J. Kirchmer and released in February 2001, provides guidelines for preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) for environmental studies. It outlines standards and procedures to ensure that data collected during environmental investigations meets defined quality and reliability requirements.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, environmental assessment, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, Third Runway
  • 2001-01-25

    EXH AR023689: Notes 3RW Public Meetings & Hearings Jan 26-27 2001

    These are prepared talking points for Washington State Department of Ecology officials attending public meetings on January 26-27, 2001, regarding the proposed Third Runway (3RW) at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The notes address 17 anticipated public questions covering topics such as Ecology's 401 Water Quality Certification review process, the use of Port-funded consultants, SEPA compliance, wetlands impacts, and whether the project was receiving special political consideration. Officials emphasized that no approval would be granted until the project demonstrated full compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations.
    TagsACC, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SEPA, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-01-25

    EXH AR049866: Letter from Peter M. Douglass, Technical Review Board Facilitator, Regarding Third Runway Embankment Fill and MSE Wall Design Review

    Letter dated January 25, 2001 from Peter M. Douglass, P.E. (Technical Review Board Facilitator) to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Jonathan Freedman, Project Manager) and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ann Kenny, Environmental Specialist) summarizing findings of an independent expert panel convened by Port Of Seattle to review embankment fill and mechanically stabilized earth (MSE)
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Ecology, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-01-24

    EXH AR023684: Letter to Ecology re MTCA Ground Water Study STIA w/ Meeting Notes Agreed Order Status 11/16/00

    A January 2001 letter and accompanying meeting notes document communications between the Port of Seattle and the Washington Department of Ecology regarding a groundwater contamination study at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, conducted under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Agreed Order 97TC-N112. The records outline the scope of the study, which focuses on hydrogeologic investigation and a review of the Fuel Operations Area, and clarify that any necessary cleanup would be handled separately after the study's completion. Both parties discussed concerns about scope expansion and the process for addressing contaminated sites identified through the study.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-01-21

    Exhibit 212: Tom Luster (Ecology) Letter to Senator Julia Patterson on Sea-Tac Third Runway Section 401 Water Quality Certification Review

    In a January 2001 letter to Washington State Senator Julia Patterson, outgoing Department of Ecology official Tom Luster summarizes the key water quality issues surrounding the proposed Sea-Tac Airport expansion review under Section 401 of the federal Clean Water Act. The assessment outlines concerns including stormwater management, wetland impacts, streamflow, and whether the project's discharges would meet state water quality standards for antidegradation, beneficial uses, and numeric water quality criteria. Luster notes the views are his own and may not fully reflect Ecology's current position, directing the Senator to contact Ann Kenny at Ecology's Northwest Regional Office for the latest information.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 … Page 80
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Legal Services Agreement Regarding Issues Regarding Port of Seattle’s Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP)" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V