Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-01-17

    Fourth declaration of Steven G. Jones

    Declaration by Steven G. Jones, attorney for the Port of Seattle, submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board in the case of Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. The declaration addresses discovery disputes, including the Port’s responses to ACC’s document production requests and the scheduling of
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-16

    Airport Communities Coalition’s and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion’s application for direct review by Court of Appeals, and request pursuant to RCW 34.05.518 for certificate of appealability of Pollution Control Hearings Board’s order granting stay

    ACC and CASE filed this application seeking direct review by the Washington Court of Appeals, Division II, of the Pollution Control Hearings Board’s December 17, 2001 Stay Order regarding the Section 401 Certification. The document argues that the Stay Order constitutes a final decision subject to direct appellate review under RCW 34.05.518, and requests the
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-16

    Denial of certificates of appealability — PCHB 01-160

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) issued a denial of certificates of appealability requested by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion (CASE) for direct review by the Court of Appeals. The Board determined it lacked authority to issue the certificates despite finding the matters clearly met the criteria for direct review. The
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-16

    Respondent Port Of Seattle’s motion to dismiss petition for review of agency action

    The Port of Seattle filed a motion to dismiss under Civil Rule 12(b)(6), seeking dismissal of the Airport Communities Coalition’s and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion’s Petition for Review of Agency Action. The petition sought judicial review of the Pollution Control Hearings Board’s orders related to a Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed third
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-16

    CASE’s response to ACC’s motion for summary judgment re: necessary water right

    Citizens Against Seatac Expansion (CASE) concurs with the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion for summary judgment regarding the absence of a water right for the Third Runway Section 401 Certification. The brief argues that the Port of Seattle’s proposal to collect, store, and release stormwater to augment summer low-streamflow in Miller and Des Moines Creeks constitutes
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-15

    Letter to Hon. Kaleen Cottingham regarding Port’s request for emergency status conference

    A letter from Helsell Fetterman LLP attorney Peter J. Eglick to Presiding Officer Kaleen Cottingham of the Pollution Control Hearings Board opposing the Port of Seattle’s emergency request for a status conference in PCHB No. 01-160. The letter argues the conference is premature and unfair to ACC, which has not yet submitted response briefs, and
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-14

    Ecology’s response to ACC’s motion for summary judgment regarding the absence of a water right

    The Washington State Department of Ecology responds to the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion for summary judgment, arguing that a water right is not necessary for Ecology to have reasonable assurance that water quality standards will be met. Ecology contends that the conditions in the Clean Water Act § 401 Certification already provide sufficient assurance, and
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-14

    Port Of Seattle’s memorandum in opposition to ACC’s motion for summary judgment regarding the absence of a water right for third runway § 401 certification

    The Port of Seattle opposes the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion for summary judgment, arguing that no water right is required to manage stormwater as mandated by its NPDES permit and 401 Certification. The Port outlines how its stormwater management plan—including detention ponds, vaults, and infiltration—addresses peak flow, low flow, and water quality impacts from new
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-11

    ACC’s motion to extend discovery schedule

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) filed a motion with the Pollution Control Hearings Board requesting extensions to the discovery schedule, including extending the deadline to depose Port of Seattle witnesses, file final exhibit lists, and file pre-filed direct testimony. The motion details ACC’s efforts to coordinate site inspections and depositions with the Port of Seattle and
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-11

    ACC’s motion to compel inspection of Port property

    The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) filed a motion before the Pollution Control Hearings Board seeking an order compelling entry upon the Third Runway/Master Plan Update project area to observe, photograph, and sample soils, wetlands, and streams. ACC argues the Port of Seattle has routinely granted unfettered site access to Ecology officials and public groups without
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "2025 Aviation Preliminary Budget Key Takeaways Slide" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V